COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women planning for pregnancy, pregnant or breastfeeding mothers in Jordan: A cross-sectional study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
03
2022
accepted:
13
05
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
1
6
2023
entrez:
1
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breastfeeding are more hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines compared to other women globally. This study investigates COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women, who are planning for pregnancy, currently pregnant, and breastfeeding women in Jordan. An online cross-sectional study was conducted in the biggest three cities in Jordan, including 874 women. Women who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 (7.12 ± 0.72, 7.53 ± 1.80, 7.2439 ± 7296, respectively), significant lower levels of perceived benefits of the vaccine (8.92 ± 2.15, 8.73 ± 1.93, 9.09 ± 2.10, respectively), significant lower levels of motivation and causes of action (7.15 ± 1.71, 6.7524 ± 1.40, 7.27 ± 1.68, respectively), and significantly higher levels of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy (31.32 ± 6.40, 30.11 ± 4.49, 30.27 ± 6.29, respectively) than other women. Married women, those whoe were previously infected with COVID-19, and those who had chronic diseases reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of COVID-19 seriousness, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccine, motivation to take COVID-19 vaccine, and causes of action, and significantly higher levels of hesitancy to take COVID-19 vaccine than unmarried women, those who have not been infected with COVID-19, and those who were medically healthy (p<0.001). There were statistically significant positive correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with years of education; and statistically significant negative correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with age (p<0.001). Women who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding in Jordan showed miderate scores in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy despite the current international recommendations for its safety for women and their foetuses or neonates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Women planning to become pregnant, who are pregnant, and who are breastfeeding are more hesitant to take COVID-19 vaccines compared to other women globally.
AIM
This study investigates COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among women, who are planning for pregnancy, currently pregnant, and breastfeeding women in Jordan.
METHODS
An online cross-sectional study was conducted in the biggest three cities in Jordan, including 874 women.
RESULTS
Women who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 (7.12 ± 0.72, 7.53 ± 1.80, 7.2439 ± 7296, respectively), significant lower levels of perceived benefits of the vaccine (8.92 ± 2.15, 8.73 ± 1.93, 9.09 ± 2.10, respectively), significant lower levels of motivation and causes of action (7.15 ± 1.71, 6.7524 ± 1.40, 7.27 ± 1.68, respectively), and significantly higher levels of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy (31.32 ± 6.40, 30.11 ± 4.49, 30.27 ± 6.29, respectively) than other women. Married women, those whoe were previously infected with COVID-19, and those who had chronic diseases reported statistically significant lower levels of perception of COVID-19 seriousness, perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccine, motivation to take COVID-19 vaccine, and causes of action, and significantly higher levels of hesitancy to take COVID-19 vaccine than unmarried women, those who have not been infected with COVID-19, and those who were medically healthy (p<0.001). There were statistically significant positive correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with years of education; and statistically significant negative correlations between perception, perceived benefits, motivation, and cause of action with age (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Women who were planning for pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding in Jordan showed miderate scores in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy despite the current international recommendations for its safety for women and their foetuses or neonates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37262063
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286289
pii: PONE-D-22-08549
pmc: PMC10234543
doi:
Substances chimiques
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286289Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Masa'deh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The Authors have declared no competing interests exist.
Références
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Mar 23;2(1):71-77
pubmed: 33786533
Tob Use Insights. 2021 Nov 23;14:1179173X211053022
pubmed: 34866951
Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):699-701
pubmed: 35123665
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):504-512
pubmed: 35027756
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Aug;97:107724
pubmed: 33951558
BMJ. 2020 Jun 8;369:m2107
pubmed: 32513659
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 22;9:719665
pubmed: 34631647
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4
pubmed: 25896383
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 17;57(9):
pubmed: 34577900
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211013303
pubmed: 33913365
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):33
pubmed: 35030996
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249716
pubmed: 33819301
Infect Dis Rep. 2021 Jul 31;13(3):685-699
pubmed: 34449637
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021 Dec;20(12):1619-1628
pubmed: 34592123
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250555
pubmed: 33891660
Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(2):194-200
pubmed: 34270527
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Dec 17;14(12):e0008961
pubmed: 33332359
J Dent Hyg. 2022 Feb;96(1):5-16
pubmed: 35190489
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Sep;3(5):100403
pubmed: 34048965
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;9(1):
pubmed: 33445581
Biomed Pharmacother. 2020 Sep;129:110499
pubmed: 32768974
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Jul;105(4):455
pubmed: 32253201
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):471-474
pubmed: 35020935
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):120
pubmed: 33509104
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Oct;21(10):1443-1454
pubmed: 35818804
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):236.e1-236.e14
pubmed: 34389291
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;28(1):70-76
pubmed: 34081668
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 21;17(9):e0274966
pubmed: 36129894
BMJ. 2021 Nov 22;375:n2862
pubmed: 34810161
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Nov 23;15:2609-2618
pubmed: 34866902
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 01;9(4):
pubmed: 33915890
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):601-615
pubmed: 33753937