Results of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular AMD in eyes with different baseline visual acuity in Turkish population-based on real life data-Bosphorus retina study group.


Journal

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy
ISSN: 1873-1597
Titre abrégé: Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101226123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 18 02 2023
revised: 16 04 2023
accepted: 26 05 2023
medline: 3 7 2023
pubmed: 2 6 2023
entrez: 1 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the anatomical and visual outcomes of the patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), according to the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) based on the multicenter real-life data. Five-hundred-ninety patients who had taken the Pro Re Nata (PRN) treatment regimen with three loading doses and at least one year of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the baseline BCVA: Group 1 (BCVA ≥ 1.3 Logmar), Group 2 (1.3 Logmar > BCVA ≥ 0.3 Logmar), and Group 3 (BCVA ≤ 0.2 Logmar). BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of injections and visits were evaluated. There were 175, 322, and 93 patients in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. The number of visits and injections in the 1st year was not different between the groups (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08) and was 7.09 and 4.41 (Group 1), 6.59 and 5.58 (Group 2), 6.77 and 4.08 (Group 3). There was a significant difference in CMT between the baseline and 12th month in Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) but not in Group 3 (p = 0.84). BCVA was significantly better in the 12th month in Group 1 (p < 0.001), slightly worse in Group 2 (p = 0.79), and significantly worse in Group 3 (p < 0.001). This study provides evidence that an inadequate number of injections cannot protect vision. Moreover, it can cause vision loss, especially in the eyes with good vision.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To investigate the anatomical and visual outcomes of the patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), according to the baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) based on the multicenter real-life data.
METHODS METHODS
Five-hundred-ninety patients who had taken the Pro Re Nata (PRN) treatment regimen with three loading doses and at least one year of follow-up were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the baseline BCVA: Group 1 (BCVA ≥ 1.3 Logmar), Group 2 (1.3 Logmar > BCVA ≥ 0.3 Logmar), and Group 3 (BCVA ≤ 0.2 Logmar). BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), and the number of injections and visits were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 175, 322, and 93 patients in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively. The number of visits and injections in the 1st year was not different between the groups (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08) and was 7.09 and 4.41 (Group 1), 6.59 and 5.58 (Group 2), 6.77 and 4.08 (Group 3). There was a significant difference in CMT between the baseline and 12th month in Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) but not in Group 3 (p = 0.84). BCVA was significantly better in the 12th month in Group 1 (p < 0.001), slightly worse in Group 2 (p = 0.79), and significantly worse in Group 3 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study provides evidence that an inadequate number of injections cannot protect vision. Moreover, it can cause vision loss, especially in the eyes with good vision.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37263398
pii: S1572-1000(23)00367-8
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103640
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
Ranibizumab ZL1R02VT79
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
Photosensitizing Agents 0

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103640

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Mine Ozturk (M)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34096, Turkey. Electronic address: dr_mine@yahoo.com.

Abdullah Ozkaya (A)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Levent Karabas (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli 41380, Turkey.

Cengiz Alagoz (C)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Zeynep Alkın (Z)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Ozgur Artunay (O)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Sadık Etka Bayramoglu (SE)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34303, Turkey.

Selim Bolukbasi (S)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34384, Turkey.

Gokhan Demir (G)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Mehmet Demir (M)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34360, Turkey.

Ali Demircan (A)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Burak Erden (B)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34384, Turkey.

Gurkan Erdogan (G)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Mehmet Erdogan (M)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34303, Turkey.

Erdem Eris (E)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Havva Kaldirim (H)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.

İsmail Umut Onur (İU)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34147, Turkey.

Ozen Ayrancı Osmanbasoğlu (OA)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34098, Turkey.

Sezin Ozdogan Erkul (SO)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34098, Turkey.

İrfan Perente (İ)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Kubra Sarici (K)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34303, Turkey.

Nihat Sayin (N)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34303, Turkey.

Dilek Yasa (D)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

İhsan Yilmaz (İ)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34421, Turkey.

Zeynep Yılmazabdurrahmanoglu (Z)

Ophthalmology Clinic, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH