Is it enough to observe less than 2 cm sized gastric SET?
Endoscopic resection
Gastric subepithelial tumor
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
received:
08
01
2023
accepted:
30
04
2023
medline:
31
8
2023
pubmed:
2
6
2023
entrez:
1
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recent surge in demand for screening endoscopy has led to an increased detection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). According to current guideline, SETs less than 2 cm in size are recommended for periodic surveillance. In light of recent advancement in therapeutic endoscopy in resection of small SET, we analyzed the histopathological features and the effectiveness of endoscopic resection for these small SETs. Retrospectively study was performed on 74 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric small (≤ 2 cm) upper gastrointestinal tract SETs. The outcomes including histopathology and en bloc resection were analyzed. The mean SET size was 11.69 ± 5.11 mm. The mean procedure time was 81.26 ± 42.53 min. Of the 74 patients, 28 patients had leiomyomas, 26 had gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 14 had ectopic pancreas, 4 had lipomas, and 2 had neuroendocrine tumors. Among those with GIST, two patients exhibited high-risk histology. All patients underwent successful and uneventful endoscopy. Endoscopic resection can be recommended even for the small gastric SETs. In our study, we found that SETs with a size of less than 2 cm have significant proportion of GISTs which harbor malignant transformation potential.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The recent surge in demand for screening endoscopy has led to an increased detection of gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). According to current guideline, SETs less than 2 cm in size are recommended for periodic surveillance. In light of recent advancement in therapeutic endoscopy in resection of small SET, we analyzed the histopathological features and the effectiveness of endoscopic resection for these small SETs.
METHODS
Retrospectively study was performed on 74 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of gastric small (≤ 2 cm) upper gastrointestinal tract SETs. The outcomes including histopathology and en bloc resection were analyzed.
RESULTS
The mean SET size was 11.69 ± 5.11 mm. The mean procedure time was 81.26 ± 42.53 min. Of the 74 patients, 28 patients had leiomyomas, 26 had gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), 14 had ectopic pancreas, 4 had lipomas, and 2 had neuroendocrine tumors. Among those with GIST, two patients exhibited high-risk histology. All patients underwent successful and uneventful endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS
Endoscopic resection can be recommended even for the small gastric SETs. In our study, we found that SETs with a size of less than 2 cm have significant proportion of GISTs which harbor malignant transformation potential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37264226
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10110-0
pii: 10.1007/s00464-023-10110-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6798-6805Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P (1991) Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. Surg Endosc 5:20–23
doi: 10.1007/BF00591381
pubmed: 1871670
Deprez PH, Moons LM, OʼToole D, Gincul R, Seicean A, Pimentel-Nunes P, Fernández-Esparrach G, Polkowski M, Vieth M, Borbath I (2022) Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 54:412–429
doi: 10.1055/a-1751-5742
pubmed: 35180797
Aslanian HR, Sethi A, Bhutani MS, Goodman AJ, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Sullivan SA, Thosani N, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT (2019) ASGE guideline for endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection. VideoGIE 4:343–350
doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.03.010
pubmed: 31388606
pmcid: 6669323
Kushnir VM, Keswani RN, Hollander TG, Kohlmeier C, Mullady DK, Azar RR, Murad FM, Komanduri S, Edmundowicz SA, Early DS (2015) Compliance with surveillance recommendations for foregut subepithelial tumors is poor: results of a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 81:1378–1384
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.013
pubmed: 25660977
Joo MK, Park JJ, Kim H, Koh JS, Lee BJ, Chun HJ, Lee SW, Jang YJ, Mok YJ, Bak YT (2016) Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 83:318–326
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.07.034
pubmed: 26227928
Hsu WH, Wu TS, Hsieh MS, Kung YM, Wang YK, Wu JY, Yu FJ, Kuo CH, Su YC, Wang JY, Wu DC, Hu HM (2021) Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection application on mucosal tumor and subepithelial tumor in stomach. J Cancer 12:765–770
doi: 10.7150/jca.47653
pubmed: 33403034
pmcid: 7778549
Jeong IH, Kim JH, Lee SR, Kim JH, Hwang JC, Shin SJ, Lee KM, Hur H, Han SU (2012) Minimally invasive treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: laparoscopic and endoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:244–250
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31825078f2
pubmed: 22678321
Kim MY, Jung HY, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee JH, Kim DH, Choi KS, Lee GH, Kim JH (2011) Natural history of asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 45:330–336
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318206474e
pubmed: 21278578
Gill KR, Camellini L, Conigliaro R, Sassatelli R, Azzolini F, Messerotti A, Woodward TA, Wallace MB, Jamil LH, Raimondo M (2009) The natural history of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: a multicenter endoscopic ultrasound survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 43:723–726
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31818a8457
pubmed: 19238092
Won T-K, Kim E-Y, Seo C-J, Kim B-S, Kim Y-S, Cho K-H, Jung J-T, Kwon J-G, Lee C-H, Kim H-G (2006) Endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 313–319
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Bui MM, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ (2020) NCCN guidelines insights: soft tissue sarcoma, version 1.2021: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18:1604–1612
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0058
Miettinen M, Lasota J (2006) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1466–1478
doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1466-GSTROM
pubmed: 17090188
Chen K, Pan Y, Zhai S-t, Pan J-h, Yu W-h, Chen D-w, Yan J-f, Wang X-f (2017) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic local resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single-center experience of 266 patients. BMC Surg 17:1–9
doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0231-0
Choi CI, Lee SH, Hwang SH, Kim DH, Jeon TY, Kim DH, Park DY (2016) Various features of laparoscopic tailored resection for gastric submucosal tumors: a single institution’s results for 168 patients. Surg Endosc 30:1450–1458
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4350-3
pubmed: 26139497
Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier J (2000) Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut 46:88–92
doi: 10.1136/gut.46.1.88
pubmed: 10601061
pmcid: 1727785
Al-Bawardy B, Rajan E, Wong Kee Song LM (2017) Over-the-scope clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection of epithelial and subepithelial GI lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 85:1087–1092
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.019
pubmed: 27569858
Andalib I, Yeoun D, Reddy R, Xie S, Iqbal S (2018) Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in North America: methods and feasibility data. Surg Endosc 32:1787–1792
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5862-9
pubmed: 28916847
He G, Wang J, Chen B, Xing X, Wang J, Chen J, He Y, Cui Y, Chen M (2016) Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors treatment and value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pre-operation assess and post-operation follow-up: a prospective study of 224 cases in a single medical center. Surg Endosc 30:4206–4213
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4729-1
pubmed: 26823060
Yin X, Yin Y, Chen H, Shen C, Tang S, Cai Z, Zhang B, Chen Z (2018) Comparison analysis of three different types of minimally invasive procedures for gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤5 cm. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 28:58–64
doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0305
pubmed: 29083255