Binocular summation of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in children with intermittent exotropia.
Binocular summation
Binocular vision
Contrast sensitivity
Intermittent exotropia
Visual acuity
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2023
01 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
27
02
2023
accepted:
05
05
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
2
6
2023
entrez:
1
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate the binocular summation (BiS) of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) before and after surgery and to probe the relationship between the two BiS phenomena and corresponding influencing factors. This prospective study included 21 IXT children (11 males and 10 females; aged 6-13 years) who underwent strabismus surgery in Tianjin Eye Hospital from January to April 2022. The visual function was assessed preoperatively and 2.95 ± 0.14 months postoperatively, including monocular/ binocular visual acuity (MVA/BVA) at 100% contrast and 2.5% contrast as well as monocular/binocular contrast sensitivity (MCS/BCS), deviation, near and distant stereopsis, and fusion. All patients had postoperative deviation ranging from 0 to -4 PD. Either preoperative or postoperative BVA at 2.5% contrast was superior to the MVA. The postoperative BiS at 2.5% contrast was significantly superior to the preoperative BiS for 2.5% contrast and postoperative BiS for 100% contrast (P < 0.05). Except for 3 c/d, the MCS and BCS at 6 c/d, 12 c/d and 18 c/d spatial frequencies were all notably improved postoperatively. The postoperative binocular summation ratio of CS (BSR) was highest while interocular difference ratio of CS (IOR) was the lowest at 6 c/d among 4 spatial frequencies. The deviation, distant and near stereopsis, and fusion performance were all remarkably improved after surgery (p = 0.001; p = 0.041; p = 0.000), all of which were not related to BVA at 2.5% contrast, BiS, BSC and BSR. The BCS at middle and high frequencies (6 c/ds, 12 c/ds, and 18 c/ds) was significantly negatively correlated with the BVA at 2.5% contrast, and BSR was irrelevant to the corresponding IOR across different spatial frequencies. BVA at low contrast and BCS examinations were not equivalent to stereopsis and fusion status, which contributed to the evaluation of binocular function in the real environment and in the different aspects. BVA in 2.5% contrast is related with BCS in moderate and high spacial frequencies (especially 18c/d) but BCS in 6c/d presents more binocular summation of contrast sensitivity. MCS, BCS and the BSR persist inhibition at 3c/d after surgery. The improvement of BCS is better than that of BSR to evaluate the binouclar function in IXT. Those two methods showed different sensitivities to impairment and rehabilitation of binocular summation and inhibition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37264304
doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02961-x
pii: 10.1186/s12886-023-02961-x
pmc: PMC10233972
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
245Subventions
Organisme : Tianjin Nature science Foundation
ID : (21JCYBJC01860)
Organisme : Science and Technology Project of Tianjin Health Commission
ID : (ZC20187)
Organisme : Tianjin Key Medical Discipine (Specialty) Construction Project
ID : TJYXZDXK-016A
Organisme : Nankai University Eye Institute
ID : (NKYKK202201)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Vision Res. 1984;24(4):373-83
pubmed: 6740958
Strabismus. 2017 Jun;25(2):81-86
pubmed: 28481654
Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;52(2):214-218
pubmed: 28457294
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 12;13:234
pubmed: 31354452
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;152(2):314-9
pubmed: 21621744
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 21;8:791548
pubmed: 34993215
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;133(3):326-32
pubmed: 25555109
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 May;251(5):1405-11
pubmed: 23254486
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;93(2):192-8
pubmed: 25041696
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 18;12(11):1725-1730
pubmed: 31741861
Vision Res. 2011 Apr 13;51(7):754-70
pubmed: 20951722
J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):551-66
pubmed: 5666169
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;80(7):767-72
pubmed: 19240050
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 May;165:29-32
pubmed: 26921805
Percept Psychophys. 1981 Sep;30(3):266-76
pubmed: 7322802
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;131(11):1413-9
pubmed: 24052160
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jul 05;33(32):e222
pubmed: 30079006
J Neurophysiol. 1984 Sep;52(3):538-52
pubmed: 6481443
Curr Eye Res. 2003 Nov;27(5):315-21
pubmed: 14562168
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15584
pubmed: 34341420
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;70(1):210-213
pubmed: 34937240
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Apr;22(4):525-34
pubmed: 7061221
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;152(1):133-40
pubmed: 21570055
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 21;12(1):6542
pubmed: 35449175
Nature. 1965 Oct 9;208(5006):191-2
pubmed: 5884255
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jun;43(6):1742-8
pubmed: 12036974