Epidemiological overview of major depressive disorder in Scandinavia using nationwide registers.
Electronic health records
Epidemiology
Heritability
Major depressive disorder
National patient register
Journal
The Lancet regional health. Europe
ISSN: 2666-7762
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Eur
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101777707
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
02
12
2022
revised:
07
03
2023
accepted:
10
03
2023
medline:
2
6
2023
pubmed:
2
6
2023
entrez:
2
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder associated with a high disease burden. This study gives a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, outcomes, treatment, and genetic epidemiology of MDD within and across the Scandinavian countries. This study has aimed to assess and compare across Norway, Denmark, and Sweden 1) the prevalence and trajectories of MDD and comorbidity, 2) outcomes and treatment, and 3) heritability (Denmark and Sweden only). The analyses leveraged data on 272,944 MDD cases (and 6.2 million non-cases) from Norway, Sweden, and Denmark in specialist care in national longitudinal health registers covering 1975-2013. Relying on harmonized public data global comparisons of socioeconomic and health metrics were performed to assess to what extent findings are generalizable. MDD ranked among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders. For many cases, the disorder trajectory was severe, with varying proportions experiencing recurrence, developing comorbid disorders, requiring inpatient treatment, or dying of suicide. Important country differences in specialist care prevalence and treatment were observed. Heritability estimates were moderate (35-48%). In terms of socioeconomic and health indices, the Scandinavian nations were comparable to one another and grouped with other Western nations. The Scandinavian countries were similar with regards to MDD epidemiological measures, but we show that differences in health care organization need to be taken into consideration when comparing countries. This study demonstrates the utility of using comprehensive population-wide registry data, outlining possibilities for other applications. The findings will be of use to policy makers for developing better prevention and intervention strategies. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, award D0886501 to PFS), US National Institutes of Mental HealthR01 MH123724 (to PFS), European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (847776 and 964874, to OA) and European Research Council grant (grant agreement ID 101042183, to YL).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder associated with a high disease burden. This study gives a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, outcomes, treatment, and genetic epidemiology of MDD within and across the Scandinavian countries.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study has aimed to assess and compare across Norway, Denmark, and Sweden 1) the prevalence and trajectories of MDD and comorbidity, 2) outcomes and treatment, and 3) heritability (Denmark and Sweden only). The analyses leveraged data on 272,944 MDD cases (and 6.2 million non-cases) from Norway, Sweden, and Denmark in specialist care in national longitudinal health registers covering 1975-2013. Relying on harmonized public data global comparisons of socioeconomic and health metrics were performed to assess to what extent findings are generalizable.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
MDD ranked among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders. For many cases, the disorder trajectory was severe, with varying proportions experiencing recurrence, developing comorbid disorders, requiring inpatient treatment, or dying of suicide. Important country differences in specialist care prevalence and treatment were observed. Heritability estimates were moderate (35-48%). In terms of socioeconomic and health indices, the Scandinavian nations were comparable to one another and grouped with other Western nations.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
The Scandinavian countries were similar with regards to MDD epidemiological measures, but we show that differences in health care organization need to be taken into consideration when comparing countries. This study demonstrates the utility of using comprehensive population-wide registry data, outlining possibilities for other applications. The findings will be of use to policy makers for developing better prevention and intervention strategies.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, award D0886501 to PFS), US National Institutes of Mental HealthR01 MH123724 (to PFS), European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (847776 and 964874, to OA) and European Research Council grant (grant agreement ID 101042183, to YL).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37265784
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100621
pii: S2666-7762(23)00039-X
pmc: PMC10230616
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100621Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PFS is a scientific advisor and shareholder for Neumora Therapeutics. AJ has served as a speaker for Takeda. HL reports receiving grants from Shire Pharmaceuticals; personal fees from and serving as a speaker for Medice, Shire/Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Evolan Pharma AB; and sponsorship for a conference on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from Shire/Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Evolan Pharma AB, all outside the submitted work. HL is editor-in-chief of JCPP Advances. OAA is a consultant to HealthLytix and received speaker's honorarium from Sunovion and Lundbeck.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 8;119(6):
pubmed: 35131856
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):403
pubmed: 29866201
Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014 Aug;35(3):320-30
pubmed: 24887405
Psychometrika. 2011 Apr 1;76(2):306-317
pubmed: 23258944
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):390-396
pubmed: 32939067
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150
pubmed: 35026139
Psychol Med. 2021 Oct;51(13):2217-2230
pubmed: 33682643
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Feb 1;22(2):93-104
pubmed: 29688548
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):382-8
pubmed: 27063603
Lancet. 2022 Mar 5;399(10328):957-1022
pubmed: 35180424
Brain Sci. 2017 Nov 24;7(12):
pubmed: 29186800
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2018 Nov;49(10):1469-1505
pubmed: 30369633
PLoS Biol. 2018 Jan 9;16(1):e2003703
pubmed: 29315301
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 Nov 20;138(20):
pubmed: 30539620
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):259-270
pubmed: 30649197
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 17;7:449-90
pubmed: 26604824
Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 26;18(16):1241-8
pubmed: 18691889
Brief Bioinform. 2002 Jun;3(2):119-33
pubmed: 12139432
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 19;13:533-554
pubmed: 34321928