CCR4 and CCR7 differentially regulate thymocyte localization with distinct outcomes for central tolerance.


Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 20 05 2022
accepted: 01 06 2023
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 2 6 2023
entrez: 2 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Central tolerance ensures autoreactive T cells are eliminated or diverted to the regulatory T cell lineage, thus preventing autoimmunity. To undergo central tolerance, thymocytes must enter the medulla to test their T-cell receptors (TCRs) for autoreactivity against the diverse self-antigens displayed by antigen-presenting cells (APCs). While CCR7 is known to promote thymocyte medullary entry and negative selection, our previous studies implicate CCR4 in these processes, raising the question of whether CCR4 and CCR7 play distinct or redundant roles in central tolerance. Here, synchronized positive selection assays, two-photon time-lapse microscopy, and quantification of TCR-signaled apoptotic thymocytes, demonstrate that CCR4 and CCR7 promote medullary accumulation and central tolerance of distinct post-positive selection thymocyte subsets in mice. CCR4 is upregulated within hours of positive selection signaling and promotes medullary entry and clonal deletion of immature post-positive selection thymocytes. In contrast, CCR7 is expressed several days later and is required for medullary localization and negative selection of mature thymocytes. In addition, CCR4 and CCR7 differentially enforce self-tolerance, with CCR4 enforcing tolerance to self-antigens presented by activated APCs, which express CCR4 ligands. Our findings show that CCR7 expression is not synonymous with medullary localization and support a revised model of central tolerance in which CCR4 and CCR7 promote early and late stages of negative selection, respectively, via interactions with distinct APC subsets. Autoimmune diseases occur when immune cells mistakenly identify the body’s own tissues as ‘foreign’ and attack them. To reduce the risk of this happening, the body has multiple ways of removing self-reactive immune cells, including T cells. One such way, known as central tolerance, occurs in the thymus – the organ where T cells develop. In the center of the thymus – the medulla – specialized cells display fragments of the majority of proteins expressed by healthy cells throughout the body. Developing T cells enter the medulla, where they scan these specialized cells to determine if they recognize the presented protein fragments. If an immature T cell recognizes and binds to these ‘self-antigens’ too strongly, it is either destroyed, or it develops into a regulatory cell, capable of actively suppressing T cell responses to that self-antigen. This ensures that T cells won’t attack healthy cells in the body that make those self-antigens, and therefore, it is important that T cells enter the medulla and carry out this scanning process efficiently. T cells are recruited to the medulla from the outer region of the thymus by chemical signals called chemokines. These signals are recognized by chemokine receptors on T cells, which are expressed at different times during T cell development. Previous work has shown that one of these receptors, called CCR7, guides T cells to the medulla. Although it was thought that CCR7 was solely responsible for this migration, prior work suggests another receptor, CCR4, may also contribute to T cell migration into the medulla and central tolerance. To determine whether CCR7 and CCR4 play the same or different roles in central tolerance, Li, Tipan et al. used a combination of experimental methods, including live imaging of the thymus, to study T cell development in mice. The experiments revealed that CCR4 is expressed first, and this receptor alone guides immature T cells into the medulla and ensures that they are the first to be checked for self-reactivity. In contrast, CCR7 is expressed by more mature developing T cells two to three days later, ensuring they also accumulate within the medulla and become tolerant to self-antigens. Both receptors are required for protection from autoimmunity, with results suggesting that CCR4 and CCR7 promote tolerance against different tissues. Taken together, the findings provide new information about the distinct requirement for CCR4 and CCR7 in guiding immature T cells into the medulla and ensuring central tolerance to diverse tissues. One outstanding question is whether defects in T cells entering the medulla earlier or later alter tolerance to distinct self-antigens and lead to different autoimmune diseases. Future work will also investigate whether these observations hold true in humans, potentially leading to therapies for autoimmune diseases.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Autoimmune diseases occur when immune cells mistakenly identify the body’s own tissues as ‘foreign’ and attack them. To reduce the risk of this happening, the body has multiple ways of removing self-reactive immune cells, including T cells. One such way, known as central tolerance, occurs in the thymus – the organ where T cells develop. In the center of the thymus – the medulla – specialized cells display fragments of the majority of proteins expressed by healthy cells throughout the body. Developing T cells enter the medulla, where they scan these specialized cells to determine if they recognize the presented protein fragments. If an immature T cell recognizes and binds to these ‘self-antigens’ too strongly, it is either destroyed, or it develops into a regulatory cell, capable of actively suppressing T cell responses to that self-antigen. This ensures that T cells won’t attack healthy cells in the body that make those self-antigens, and therefore, it is important that T cells enter the medulla and carry out this scanning process efficiently. T cells are recruited to the medulla from the outer region of the thymus by chemical signals called chemokines. These signals are recognized by chemokine receptors on T cells, which are expressed at different times during T cell development. Previous work has shown that one of these receptors, called CCR7, guides T cells to the medulla. Although it was thought that CCR7 was solely responsible for this migration, prior work suggests another receptor, CCR4, may also contribute to T cell migration into the medulla and central tolerance. To determine whether CCR7 and CCR4 play the same or different roles in central tolerance, Li, Tipan et al. used a combination of experimental methods, including live imaging of the thymus, to study T cell development in mice. The experiments revealed that CCR4 is expressed first, and this receptor alone guides immature T cells into the medulla and ensures that they are the first to be checked for self-reactivity. In contrast, CCR7 is expressed by more mature developing T cells two to three days later, ensuring they also accumulate within the medulla and become tolerant to self-antigens. Both receptors are required for protection from autoimmunity, with results suggesting that CCR4 and CCR7 promote tolerance against different tissues. Taken together, the findings provide new information about the distinct requirement for CCR4 and CCR7 in guiding immature T cells into the medulla and ensuring central tolerance to diverse tissues. One outstanding question is whether defects in T cells entering the medulla earlier or later alter tolerance to distinct self-antigens and lead to different autoimmune diseases. Future work will also investigate whether these observations hold true in humans, potentially leading to therapies for autoimmune diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37266571
doi: 10.7554/eLife.80443
pii: 80443
pmc: PMC10325719
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

Autoantigens 0
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell 0
Receptors, CCR7 0
Ccr7 protein, mouse 0
Ccr4 protein, mouse 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI104870
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01AI104870
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023, Li, Guaman Tipan et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

YL, PG, HS, JS, LH, LE No competing interests declared

Références

Immunity. 2006 Feb;24(2):165-77
pubmed: 16473829
Nat Immunol. 2006 Oct;7(10):1092-100
pubmed: 16951687
Immunology. 2015 Jun;145(2):232-41
pubmed: 25581706
Nat Immunol. 2015 Sep;16(9):942-9
pubmed: 26237550
Nat Genet. 1997 Dec;17(4):399-403
pubmed: 9398840
J Exp Med. 2008 Oct 27;205(11):2575-84
pubmed: 18936237
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):133-137
pubmed: 33597749
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):413-417
pubmed: 33981034
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 6;106(40):17129-33
pubmed: 19805112
J Exp Med. 2017 Jul 3;214(7):1925-1935
pubmed: 28611158
Eur J Immunol. 2000 Dec;30(12):3371-9
pubmed: 11093154
J Exp Med. 2015 Oct 19;212(11):1947-65
pubmed: 26417005
J Exp Med. 1998 Dec 21;188(12):2301-11
pubmed: 9858516
Nat Genet. 1997 Dec;17(4):393-8
pubmed: 9398839
Nat Rev Immunol. 2007 Aug;7(8):645-50
pubmed: 17641664
J Immunol. 2019 Jun 1;202(11):3226-3233
pubmed: 31010850
Sci Signal. 2013 Oct 15;6(297):ra92
pubmed: 24129702
Clin Immunol. 2005 Aug;116(2):135-42
pubmed: 15936249
J Exp Med. 2009 Jul 6;206(7):1505-13
pubmed: 19564355
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 28;12(1):6230
pubmed: 34711828
Cell Rep. 2014 Oct 9;9(1):402-415
pubmed: 25284794
J Exp Med. 2007 Oct 29;204(11):2513-20
pubmed: 17908937
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 24;111(25):E2550-8
pubmed: 24927565
Science. 1994 Mar 25;263(5154):1774-8
pubmed: 7907820
Nat Immunol. 2017 Jul;18(7):771-779
pubmed: 28530714
J Exp Med. 2004 Aug 16;200(4):493-505
pubmed: 15302902
J Exp Med. 1997 Nov 3;186(9):1503-12
pubmed: 9348308
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):622-626
pubmed: 30022162
Blood. 2003 Jan 15;101(2):585-93
pubmed: 12393559
J Immunol. 2008 Apr 15;180(8):5384-92
pubmed: 18390720
J Exp Med. 2011 Jun 6;208(6):1279-89
pubmed: 21606508
Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 Jun;14(6):377-91
pubmed: 24830344
J Exp Med. 2013 Feb 11;210(2):269-85
pubmed: 23337809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):4679-84
pubmed: 23487759
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001566
pubmed: 23700386
J Immunol. 1999 Sep 1;163(5):2353-7
pubmed: 10452965
Nat Immunol. 2009 Aug;10(8):848-56
pubmed: 19597499
Immunity. 2009 Dec 18;31(6):986-98
pubmed: 19962328
Immunity. 2004 Jun;20(6):695-705
pubmed: 15189735
J Immunol. 2009 Dec 15;183(12):7909-18
pubmed: 19933868
Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 Apr;16(4):247-58
pubmed: 26972725
Nat Rev Immunol. 2019 Jan;19(1):7-18
pubmed: 30420705
Nat Immunol. 2014 Mar;15(3):266-74
pubmed: 24487322
Immunity. 2019 Jun 18;50(6):1467-1481.e6
pubmed: 31201093
Nat Immunol. 2015 Sep;16(9):933-41
pubmed: 26237553
Cell Rep. 2018 Jan 30;22(5):1276-1287
pubmed: 29386114
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1591:9-25
pubmed: 28349472
Nat Immunol. 2014 Jul;15(7):687-94
pubmed: 24908390
Front Immunol. 2015 Aug 07;6:398
pubmed: 26300884
J Immunol. 2014 Aug 1;193(3):1204-12
pubmed: 24990081
Immunity. 2002 Feb;16(2):205-18
pubmed: 11869682
Immunol Rev. 2016 May;271(1):114-26
pubmed: 27088910
Annu Rev Immunol. 2017 Apr 26;35:85-118
pubmed: 28226225
Elife. 2021 Apr 22;10:
pubmed: 33884954
Immunity. 2016 Aug 16;45(2):305-18
pubmed: 27533013
J Immunol. 2008 Dec 1;181(11):7681-8
pubmed: 19017956
Nat Immunol. 2016 May;17(5):565-73
pubmed: 27043411
Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:649-79
pubmed: 17291187
J Exp Med. 2000 May 15;191(10):1755-64
pubmed: 10811868
Nat Immunol. 2004 Apr;5(4):418-25
pubmed: 14991052
Immunol Cell Biol. 2016 Apr;94(4):357-66
pubmed: 26510893
Blood. 2001 Apr 15;97(8):2278-85
pubmed: 11290588
Trends Immunol. 2018 Feb;39(2):86-98
pubmed: 29162323
J Exp Med. 2004 Aug 16;200(4):481-91
pubmed: 15302903
J Immunol. 2018 Feb 15;200(4):1399-1412
pubmed: 29321275
Genome Res. 2014 Dec;24(12):1918-31
pubmed: 25224068
Cell Rep. 2016 Oct 4;17(2):387-398
pubmed: 27705788
Immunity. 2000 Jul;13(1):59-71
pubmed: 10933395
Cell Rep. 2017 Oct 3;21(1):168-180
pubmed: 28978470
J Exp Med. 2006 Nov 27;203(12):2727-35
pubmed: 17116738
Science. 2002 Nov 15;298(5597):1395-401
pubmed: 12376594
Nat Commun. 2019 May 17;10(1):2220
pubmed: 31101805
J Exp Med. 2019 Aug 5;216(8):1749-1761
pubmed: 31201207
Immunity. 2015 Jun 16;42(6):1048-61
pubmed: 26070482
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 30;110(31):E2905-14
pubmed: 23858460

Auteurs

Yu Li (Y)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.

Pablo Guaman Tipan (P)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.

Hilary J Selden (HJ)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.

Jayashree Srinivasan (J)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.

Laura P Hale (LP)

Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, United States.

Lauren I R Ehrlich (LIR)

Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States.
Department of Oncology, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, United States.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH