Effects of various sitting and standing postures on arousal and valence.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
26
01
2023
accepted:
21
05
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
2
6
2023
entrez:
2
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to research on the effects of posture on psychological states, high-power poses-with the body spread wide open-lead to high-arousal positive emotions, whereas low-power poses-with the body slumped and constricted-lead to low-arousal negative emotions. However, postures that lead to both high-arousal negative and low-arousal positive emotions have not been investigated yet. Although relative comparisons between postures have been made, the positioning of postures on the two-dimensional coordinates created by arousal and valence has not been clarified. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore and clarify which postures lead to the four types of emotions: high-arousal negative, high-arousal positive, low-arousal negative, and low-arousal positive. In Experiment 1, 29 participants (13 men and 16 women) adopted 12 sitting postures for 1 minute each. In Experiment 2, 25 participants (13 men and 12 women) adopted six sitting and six standing postures for 1 minute each. Arousal and valence were measured after each posture, and heart rate was measured during posture maintenance. Arousal and valence after adopting the postures were compared with the neutral arousal and valence. As a result, postures leading to high-arousal negative and low-arousal positive emotions were identified. In addition, postures leading to high-arousal positive emotions, which are the high-power poses, were identified. There were no differences in the magnitude of psychological effects between sitting and standing postures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37267405
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286720
pii: PONE-D-23-02273
pmc: PMC10237498
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286720Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Takayama, Sekiya. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):653-6
pubmed: 25810452
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 21;14(8):
pubmed: 28825655
Cogn Emot. 2022 Nov;36(7):1327-1342
pubmed: 35924432
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):657-63
pubmed: 25841000
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101560
pubmed: 32078947
Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 09;2:181
pubmed: 21886632
Health Psychol. 2015 Jun;34(6):632-41
pubmed: 25222091
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421
pubmed: 20371374
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1973 Sep;2(1):21-30
pubmed: 4792145
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Feb;124(2):287-310
pubmed: 35617225
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;62:80-87
pubmed: 30261357
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210-20
pubmed: 24054542
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):95-102
pubmed: 21149853
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1286-1295
pubmed: 25664473
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Nov;10(3):504-523
pubmed: 29992747
Front Psychol. 2017 May 11;8:752
pubmed: 28553249
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1992 Feb;62(6):378-82
pubmed: 1507671
Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1363-8
pubmed: 20855902
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E154
pubmed: 23057991
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;6(6):461-73
pubmed: 26401657
Science. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1002-5
pubmed: 17510358
Psychophysiology. 2005 May;42(3):255-60
pubmed: 15943678