Effectiveness of telehealth physical therapy for patients with pelvic floor disorders in a community hospital setting.
Goals
Pelvic floor
Physical therapy
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
05
03
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
28
6
2023
pubmed:
3
6
2023
entrez:
2
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine whether there are differences in meeting treatment goals between pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) patients who participated in a majority of telehealth visits versus those who participated in mostly traditional office visits at a community hospital. Retrospective chart review was performed among patients who received PFPT from April 2019 to February 2021. Cohorts were defined as "Mostly Office Visits" (> 50% office visits) and "Mostly Telehealth" (> / = 50% telehealth visits). Primary outcome measures included demographic data, number/type of visit for each patient, number of no-show/cancelation appointments, and number of patients discharged meeting PFPT goals. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. 234 subjects met criteria for the "Mostly Office Visit" cohort and 48 subjects met criteria for the "Mostly Telehealth" cohort. There were no significant differences observed in age (p = 0.919), BMI (p = 0.817), race/ethnicity (p = 0.170) or insurance type (p = 0.426) between cohorts. There was no significant difference in meeting PFPT goals between the "Mostly Office Visit" cohort (24.4%) and the "Mostly Telehealth" cohort (35.4%) (p = 0.113). There was no difference in the number of canceled visits per patient (mean cancelations "Office visit" 1.98; "Telehealth" 1.63; p = 0.246) and the number of no-show visits per patient (mean no-show's "Office visit" 0.23; "Telehealth" 0.31; p = 0.297) between cohorts. There was no difference in meeting discharge goals regardless of whether a patient participated in mostly telehealth visits versus mostly traditional office visits. Therefore, we can conclude that participating in mostly provider-led telehealth visits can be equally efficacious at providing competent PFPT care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37268794
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07078-6
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07078-6
pmc: PMC10238233
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
661-665Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Pain CP (2020) ACOG Practice Bulletin. Number 218 Obstet Gynecol 135(3):98–109
Lee DD, Arya LA, Andy UU, Sammel MD, Harvie HS (2019) Willingness of women with pelvic floor disorders to use mobile technology to communicate with their health care providers. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 25(2):134–138. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000668
doi: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000668
pubmed: 30807415
pmcid: 6392070
Connecticut So. Executive Order No. 7H. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/Office-of-the-Governor/Executive-Orders/Lamont-Executive-Orders/Executive-Order-No-7H.pdf . Published 2020.
Greiner AL (2017) Telemedicine applications in obstetrics and gynecology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 60(4):853–866
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000328
pubmed: 28990981
Implementing Telehealth in Practice (2020) ACOG committee opinion summary. Number 798 Obstet Gynecol 135(2):493–494
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003672
Araujo CC, Ade M, Juliato CRT (2019) The adherence of home pelvic floor muscles training using a mobile device application for women with urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 26(11):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000670
doi: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000670
Barrett F, Stewart LE, Brucker BM (2021) Evidence for the appropriate use of telemedicine in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Reports 16(4):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-021-00635-2
doi: 10.1007/s11884-021-00635-2
Nystrom E, Asklund I, Sjostrom M, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E (2018) Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with a mobile app: factors associated with success. Int Urogynecol J 29(9):1325–1333
doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3514-1
pubmed: 29222718
Ueda da Mata KR, Costa RC, Édos C et al (2020) Telehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic literature review. Int Urogynecol J 32(2):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04588-8
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04588-8
Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A et al (2020) Telehealth in urology: A systematic review of the literature. How much can telemedicine be useful during and after the covid-19 pandemic? Eur Urology 78(6):786–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.025