Prediction of treatment response to antipsychotic drugs for precision medicine approach to schizophrenia: randomized trials and multiomics analysis.
Antipsychotic drug
Epigenetics
Genetics
Prediction model
Schizophrenia
Treatment response
Journal
Military Medical Research
ISSN: 2054-9369
Titre abrégé: Mil Med Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101643181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 06 2023
02 06 2023
Historique:
received:
22
12
2022
accepted:
05
05
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
3
6
2023
entrez:
2
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Choosing the appropriate antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment for patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) can be challenging, as the treatment response to APD is highly variable and difficult to predict due to the lack of effective biomarkers. Previous studies have indicated the association between treatment response and genetic and epigenetic factors, but no effective biomarkers have been identified. Hence, further research is imperative to enhance precision medicine in SCZ treatment. Participants with SCZ were recruited from two randomized trials. The discovery cohort was recruited from the CAPOC trial (n = 2307) involved 6 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, and Haloperidol/Perphenazine (subsequently equally assigned to one or the other) groups. The external validation cohort was recruited from the CAPEC trial (n = 1379), which involved 8 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Aripiprazole groups. Additionally, healthy controls (n = 275) from the local community were utilized as a genetic/epigenetic reference. The genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation) risks of SCZ were assessed using the polygenic risk score (PRS) and polymethylation score, respectively. The study also examined the genetic-epigenetic interactions with treatment response through differential methylation analysis, methylation quantitative trait loci, colocalization, and promoter-anchored chromatin interaction. Machine learning was used to develop a prediction model for treatment response, which was evaluated for accuracy and clinical benefit using the area under curve (AUC) for classification, R Six risk genes for SCZ (LINC01795, DDHD2, SBNO1, KCNG2, SEMA7A, and RUFY1) involved in cortical morphology were identified as having a genetic-epigenetic interaction associated with treatment response. The developed and externally validated prediction model, which incorporated clinical information, PRS, genetic risk score (GRS), and proxy methylation level (proxyDNAm), demonstrated positive benefits for a wide range of patients receiving different APDs, regardless of sex [discovery cohort: AUC = 0.874 (95% CI 0.867-0.881), R This study presents a promising precision medicine approach to evaluate treatment response, which has the potential to aid clinicians in making informed decisions about APD treatment for patients with SCZ. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), 18. Aug 2009 retrospectively registered: CAPOC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000521 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9014 ), CAPEC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000522 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9013 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Choosing the appropriate antipsychotic drug (APD) treatment for patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) can be challenging, as the treatment response to APD is highly variable and difficult to predict due to the lack of effective biomarkers. Previous studies have indicated the association between treatment response and genetic and epigenetic factors, but no effective biomarkers have been identified. Hence, further research is imperative to enhance precision medicine in SCZ treatment.
METHODS
Participants with SCZ were recruited from two randomized trials. The discovery cohort was recruited from the CAPOC trial (n = 2307) involved 6 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, and Haloperidol/Perphenazine (subsequently equally assigned to one or the other) groups. The external validation cohort was recruited from the CAPEC trial (n = 1379), which involved 8 weeks of treatment and equally randomized the participants to the Olanzapine, Risperidone, and Aripiprazole groups. Additionally, healthy controls (n = 275) from the local community were utilized as a genetic/epigenetic reference. The genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation) risks of SCZ were assessed using the polygenic risk score (PRS) and polymethylation score, respectively. The study also examined the genetic-epigenetic interactions with treatment response through differential methylation analysis, methylation quantitative trait loci, colocalization, and promoter-anchored chromatin interaction. Machine learning was used to develop a prediction model for treatment response, which was evaluated for accuracy and clinical benefit using the area under curve (AUC) for classification, R
RESULTS
Six risk genes for SCZ (LINC01795, DDHD2, SBNO1, KCNG2, SEMA7A, and RUFY1) involved in cortical morphology were identified as having a genetic-epigenetic interaction associated with treatment response. The developed and externally validated prediction model, which incorporated clinical information, PRS, genetic risk score (GRS), and proxy methylation level (proxyDNAm), demonstrated positive benefits for a wide range of patients receiving different APDs, regardless of sex [discovery cohort: AUC = 0.874 (95% CI 0.867-0.881), R
CONCLUSIONS
This study presents a promising precision medicine approach to evaluate treatment response, which has the potential to aid clinicians in making informed decisions about APD treatment for patients with SCZ. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ ), 18. Aug 2009 retrospectively registered: CAPOC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000521 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9014 ), CAPEC-ChiCTR-RNC-09000522 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=9013 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37269009
doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00459-7
pii: 10.1186/s40779-023-00459-7
pmc: PMC10236828
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antipsychotic Agents
0
Olanzapine
N7U69T4SZR
Risperidone
L6UH7ZF8HC
Aripiprazole
82VFR53I78
Benzodiazepines
12794-10-4
DDHD2 protein, human
EC 3.1.1.-
Phospholipases
EC 3.1.-
Banques de données
ChiCTR
['ChiCTR-RNC-09000521', 'ChiCTR-RNC-09000522']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
24Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):65-74
pubmed: 29121268
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Mar;39(4):1020-30
pubmed: 24165885
Nat Genet. 2013 Sep;45(9):984-94
pubmed: 23933821
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 31;8(1):174
pubmed: 30171181
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Feb;130(2):165-169
pubmed: 36648581
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1753-1761
pubmed: 31665579
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):628-636
pubmed: 32049268
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Dec 1;46(6):1577-1586
pubmed: 32556264
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018 Oct 08;8(11):303-318
pubmed: 30344997
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Oct 24;504(2):170-175
pubmed: 21964384
Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;179(9):611-627
pubmed: 35758639
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 14;111(41):14924-9
pubmed: 25267624
Curr Top Med Chem. 2021 Oct 25;21(16):1500-1516
pubmed: 34218785
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 May;7(5):399-410
pubmed: 32220288
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1258-1269
pubmed: 34586374
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;26(12):7652-7660
pubmed: 34211121
Genome Biol. 2016 Aug 30;17(1):176
pubmed: 27572077
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Aug 26;31(10):4709-4718
pubmed: 33987663
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Sep 1;74(9):1113-1122
pubmed: 28738127
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Feb;48:101918
pubmed: 31896438
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1020-1030
pubmed: 34160554
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 1;78(3):320-330
pubmed: 33263727
Genome Biol. 2021 Jan 5;22(1):18
pubmed: 33402197
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 13;98(4):1637-42
pubmed: 11172003
Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 29;5:3746
pubmed: 24781383
Science. 2014 May 30;344(6187):1020-3
pubmed: 24831527
Nature. 2003 Jul 24;424(6947):398-405
pubmed: 12879062
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):814-23
pubmed: 26656879
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869
pubmed: 20332511
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):558-565
pubmed: 32251404
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;174(3):216-229
pubmed: 27919182
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Feb 16;12:357-73
pubmed: 26937191
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;27(2):1167-1176
pubmed: 34707236
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;17(4):645-9
pubmed: 24331356
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Jan;157:57-65
pubmed: 36442407
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 28;11(1):2061
pubmed: 32345984
Mol Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;16(2):156-70
pubmed: 20458323
Brain. 2020 Dec 1;143(12):3564-3573
pubmed: 33242881
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;176(7):552-563
pubmed: 31164006
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;3(4):350-7
pubmed: 26915512
Nat Genet. 2019 Dec;51(12):1670-1678
pubmed: 31740837
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118603
pubmed: 34560273
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 29;13(7):484-92
pubmed: 22641018
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):40-7
pubmed: 26619358
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 1;76(1):66-74
pubmed: 24143882
J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7178-90
pubmed: 22623662
Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115
pubmed: 24138928
Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):
pubmed: 33672396
Neuron. 2005 Jan 6;45(1):81-94
pubmed: 15629704
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 1;84(9):644-654
pubmed: 29960671
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;5(4):327-338
pubmed: 29503163