Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048).
Adult
Humans
Anal Canal
/ pathology
Quality of Life
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Neoplasm Staging
Organ Sparing Treatments
Rectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Fluorouracil
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Leucovorin
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2023
20 07 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
20
07
2024
medline:
19
7
2023
pubmed:
4
6
2023
entrez:
4
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America is neoadjuvant pelvic chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5FUCRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an alternative that may spare patients the morbidity of radiation. Understanding the relative patient experiences with these options is necessary to inform treatment decisions. PROSPECT was a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX versus 5FUCRT, which enrolled adults with rectal cancer clinically staged as T2N+, cT3N-, or cT3N+ who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX was given in six cycles over 12 weeks, followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant 5FUCRT was delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested but not mandated in both groups. Enrolled patients were asked to provide patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and at 12 months after surgery. PROs included 14 symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Additional PRO instruments measured bowel, bladder, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). From June 2012 to December 2018, 1,194 patients were randomly assigned, 1,128 initiated treatment, and 940 contributed PRO-CTCAE data (493 FOLFOX; 447 5FUCRT). During neoadjuvant treatment, patients reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea and better overall bowel function with FOLFOX while anxiety, appetite loss, constipation, depression, dysphagia, dyspnea, edema, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, neuropathy, and vomiting were lower with 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer choosing between neoadjuvant FOLFOX and 5FUCRT, the distinctive PRO profiles inform treatment selection and shared decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37270691
doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00903
pmc: PMC10351948
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01515787']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3724-3734Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180868
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233290
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180821
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180882
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180820
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180888
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA233046
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261200800063C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189823
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U10 CA180863
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA015083
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA233180
Pays : United States
Références
Arch Drug Inf. 2008 Sep;1(2):70-78
pubmed: 19639029
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jul;48(7):1353-65
pubmed: 15868235
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 19;14:24
pubmed: 26892667
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2016 Aug;11(8):753-8
pubmed: 27310432
Cancer. 2022 Sep 1;128(17):3233-3242
pubmed: 35749631
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Jul;16(7):791-801
pubmed: 18204940
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1132-1142
pubmed: 30553942
Drug Saf. 2013 Dec;36(12):1129-49
pubmed: 24092596
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:281-290
pubmed: 33383348
J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564
pubmed: 1279218
Med Decis Making. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):401-9
pubmed: 16855128
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 May;19(5):e745-e762
pubmed: 36854073
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40
pubmed: 15496622
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2022;18(5):55-59
pubmed: 36373155
Clin Ther. 2016 Apr;38(4):821-30
pubmed: 27045992
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Sep;31(9):753-66
pubmed: 23963867
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Jun;171:69-76
pubmed: 35447283
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):409-418
pubmed: 28463161
JAMA. 1990 Sep 19;264(11):1444-50
pubmed: 2202842
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):e193332
pubmed: 31556911
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1525-50
pubmed: 23314601
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9
pubmed: 26270597
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):742-747
pubmed: 29909880
Clin Prostate Cancer. 2005 Sep;4(2):100-8
pubmed: 16197610
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Apr;13(4):421-33
pubmed: 10178666
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;:JCO2018788620
pubmed: 30204536
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):276-285
pubmed: 30840079
J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208
pubmed: 10782451
Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;18(1):104-114
pubmed: 33258687
Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30
pubmed: 9187685
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 01;5(4):e185896
pubmed: 30629084
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2363-2376
pubmed: 35660797