Quantification of titanium and zirconium elements in oral mucosa around healthy dental implants: a case-control pilot study.
Case–control
Dental implants
Spectrophotometry 3
Titanium 1
Zirconium 2
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
18
05
2022
accepted:
29
05
2023
medline:
11
8
2023
pubmed:
4
6
2023
entrez:
4
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metallic particles are detected in different sites of the oral cavity, mainly in patients with peri-implantitis lesions. The aim of this pilot study was to analyze the levels of titanium and zirconium elements in the oral mucosa around healthy implants and to investigate the impact of titanium exogenous contamination on the measurements. Forty-one participants were included in this three-phase study. Two groups of subjects were defined according to presence of titanium or zirconia implants (n: 20) or without any implants nor metallic restorations (n:21). Thirteen patients (n: 5 with zirconia implant; n: 3 with titanium implants; n: 5 control group) took part to the first part designed to optimize and validate the method of detecting titanium (Ti) and zirconium (Zr) elements in the oral mucosa and gingival tissues by the Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICPMS). The second phase compared the levels of Ti and Zr concentrations in patients with implants (n: 12) and without implants (n: 6) who were controlled for their intake of titanium dioxide (TiO2). The last step included ten control subjects without any metallic devices to measure the concentration of Ti and Zr before and after having candies containing TiO2. In the first phase, concentrations of Ti and Zr were below the limit of detection (LOD) in most cases, 0.18 μg/L and 0.07 μg/L respectively. In the titanium group, two out of three subjects displayed concentrations above the LOD, 0.21 μg/L and 0.66 μg/L. Zr element was only found in patients with zirconia implants. After controlling the intake of TiO2, all concentrations of Ti and Zr were below the limit of quantification (LOQ). Moreover, in patients with no implants, the Ti concentration in gingiva cells was superior for 75% of the samples after having a TiO2 diet. Zirconium was only found in patients with zirconia implants, whereas titanium was detected in all groups even in subjects with no titanium implants. Zirconium and titanium elements were not detected in patients who were controlled for their intake of food and their use of toothpaste irrespective of the presence of implants or not. For 70% of the patients, the titanium detection was directly influenced by the intake of TiO2 contained candies. When analyzing titanium particles, it is necessary to pay attention to the risk of contamination bias brought by external products. When this parameter was controlled, no titanium particles were detected around clinically healthy implants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37270723
doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05099-8
pii: 10.1007/s00784-023-05099-8
pmc: PMC10415439
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
titanium dioxide
15FIX9V2JP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4715-4726Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1403-17
pubmed: 27217032
J Dent Res. 2018 Mar;97(3):259-265
pubmed: 29130804
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Oct;90(1):125-137
pubmed: 35913702
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Apr;26(4):413-418
pubmed: 24666352
Dent Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1215-20
pubmed: 23021964
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):823-35
pubmed: 18705814
Toxicology. 2015 Jan 2;327:1-9
pubmed: 25446332
Radiol Oncol. 2011 Dec;45(4):227-47
pubmed: 22933961
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jul 9;5(1):25
pubmed: 31286286
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011 Mar;139(3):241-56
pubmed: 20309648
Life Sci. 2014 Mar 3;97(2):96-106
pubmed: 24252315
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 22;102(12):4578-83
pubmed: 15755807
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Jul;25(7):1819-24
pubmed: 24682897
J Periodontol. 2015 Jan;86(1):9-15
pubmed: 25224174
Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Jun 07;11(6):2383-92
pubmed: 20640159
Biomaterials. 2002 Sep;23(17):3757-64
pubmed: 12109701
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015 Oct;32:13-20
pubmed: 26302907
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:37-53
pubmed: 30306693
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1178-86
pubmed: 26508041
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2016 Jul;172(1):1-36
pubmed: 26554951
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):457-76
pubmed: 10761937
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Feb;88(2):342-7
pubmed: 18286617
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Oct;90(1):176-185
pubmed: 35916872
J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Sep 5;46(3):399-407
pubmed: 10397998
J Periodontal Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):21-32
pubmed: 26987886
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;42(4):537-43
pubmed: 22925444
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):201-237
pubmed: 35103325
J Periodontol. 2013 Jan;84(1):78-83
pubmed: 22414261
Periodontol 2000. 2022 Oct;90(1):9-12
pubmed: 35913624
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Sep 15;98(4):604-13
pubmed: 21721117
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015 Oct;32:40-4
pubmed: 26302910
Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Aug;123(4):242-8
pubmed: 25974158
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Dec;23(6 Pt 2):450-2
pubmed: 7890998
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):811-21
pubmed: 24131612
J Oral Pathol Med. 2011 May;40(5):412-20
pubmed: 20969628
J Periodontal Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):1-11
pubmed: 28766712
J Periodontol. 2012 Aug;83(8):973-80
pubmed: 22141355
J Periodontol. 2017 May;88(5):436-442
pubmed: 27858551
Biometals. 2011 Oct;24(5):935
pubmed: 21468621
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 29;6:23615
pubmed: 27021687
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0161916
pubmed: 27611787
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):1413-1420
pubmed: 29140388
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):7-21
pubmed: 28000280
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014 Nov;213:36-47
pubmed: 25307126