A Computer Vision Algorithm to Classify Pneumatization of the Mastoid Process on Temporal Bone Computed Tomography Scans.
Journal
The journal of international advanced otology
ISSN: 2148-3817
Titre abrégé: J Int Adv Otol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101522982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
medline:
6
6
2023
pubmed:
5
6
2023
entrez:
5
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pneumatization of the mastoid process is variable and of significance to the operative surgeon. Surgical approaches to the temporal bone require an understanding of pneumatization and its implications for surgical access. This study aims to determine the feasibility of using deep learning convolutional neural network algorithms to classify pneumatization of the mastoid process. De-identified petrous temporal bone images were acquired from a tertiary hospital radiology picture archiving and communication system. A binary classification mode in the pretrained convolutional neural network was used to investigate the utility of convolutional neural networks in temporal bone imaging. False positive and negative images were reanalyzed by the investigators and qualitatively assessed to consider reasons for inaccuracy. The overall accuracy of the model was 0.954. At a probability threshold of 65%, the sensitivity of the model was 0.860 (95% CI 0.783-0.934) and the specificity was 0.989 (95% CI 0.960-0.999). The positive predictive value was 0.973 (95% CI 0.904-0.993) and the negative predictive value was 0.935 (95% CI 0.901-0.965). The false positive rate was 0.006. The F1 number was 0.926 demonstrating a high accuracy for the model. The temporal bone is a complex anatomical region of interest to otolaryngologists. Surgical planning requires high-resolution computed tomography scans, the interpretation of which can be augmented with machine learning. This initial study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing machine learning algorithms to discriminate anatomical variation with a high degree of accuracy. It is hoped this will lead to further investigation regarding more complex anatomical structures in the temporal bone.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pneumatization of the mastoid process is variable and of significance to the operative surgeon. Surgical approaches to the temporal bone require an understanding of pneumatization and its implications for surgical access. This study aims to determine the feasibility of using deep learning convolutional neural network algorithms to classify pneumatization of the mastoid process.
METHODS
METHODS
De-identified petrous temporal bone images were acquired from a tertiary hospital radiology picture archiving and communication system. A binary classification mode in the pretrained convolutional neural network was used to investigate the utility of convolutional neural networks in temporal bone imaging. False positive and negative images were reanalyzed by the investigators and qualitatively assessed to consider reasons for inaccuracy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall accuracy of the model was 0.954. At a probability threshold of 65%, the sensitivity of the model was 0.860 (95% CI 0.783-0.934) and the specificity was 0.989 (95% CI 0.960-0.999). The positive predictive value was 0.973 (95% CI 0.904-0.993) and the negative predictive value was 0.935 (95% CI 0.901-0.965). The false positive rate was 0.006. The F1 number was 0.926 demonstrating a high accuracy for the model.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The temporal bone is a complex anatomical region of interest to otolaryngologists. Surgical planning requires high-resolution computed tomography scans, the interpretation of which can be augmented with machine learning. This initial study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing machine learning algorithms to discriminate anatomical variation with a high degree of accuracy. It is hoped this will lead to further investigation regarding more complex anatomical structures in the temporal bone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37272639
doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.22958
pmc: PMC10331717
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-222Références
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Sep;10(3):257-273
pubmed: 28689314
Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1602-17
pubmed: 12906178
Ultrasonics. 2017 Jan;73:221-230
pubmed: 27668999
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):193-201
pubmed: 30583848
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jun;266(6):781-6
pubmed: 19283403
Clin Radiol. 2007 Nov;62(11):1110-8
pubmed: 17920872
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020 Jul 29;2020:1242781
pubmed: 32831817
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Aug;105(8):643-7
pubmed: 8712636
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Apr;134(4):328-331
pubmed: 32234081
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(21):4522-4524
pubmed: 30989173
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Apr;25(4):406-16
pubmed: 16608057
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1271-81
pubmed: 20839035
BMJ. 2020 Mar 25;368:m689
pubmed: 32213531
Laryngoscope. 1997 Aug;107(8):1100-6
pubmed: 9261015
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Sep;24(9):1138-50
pubmed: 16156352
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 Jan;134(1):52-55
pubmed: 31865928
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980 May-Jun;89(3 Pt 2):79-82
pubmed: 6778358
Eur J Radiol. 2019 May;114:14-24
pubmed: 31005165
Acad Radiol. 2005 Oct;12(10):1333-41
pubmed: 16179210
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997 Jan;106(1):37-40
pubmed: 9006359
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Sep;145(3):473-81
pubmed: 3875250
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jul;122:103871
pubmed: 32658741
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Jan;9(1):46-52
pubmed: 30098123
Laryngoscope. 1998 Jul;108(7):1071-6
pubmed: 9665259
Med Image Anal. 2019 Dec;58:101555
pubmed: 31520984
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1969 Feb;78(1):49-64
pubmed: 5763190