Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in Salivary Gland Lesions with Histopathological Examination (HPE) Correlation in a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India.
Diagnostic accuracy
FNAC
Neoplastic lesions
Non-neoplastic lesions
Salivary gland
Journal
Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India
ISSN: 2231-3796
Titre abrégé: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9422551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2022
accepted:
30
01
2023
pmc-release:
01
06
2024
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
5
6
2023
entrez:
5
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in salivary gland lesions compared to histopathological diagnosis. The present study was done on patients above 18 years of age, with a palpable swelling, who are clinically diagnosed as salivary gland lesions were evaluated. A total of 31 patients were evaluated in this study. The mean age of the patients was 41 years ± 16.08. The male to female ratio of patients evaluated in our study was 1: 1.066, with a marginal preponderance in the female population. There was a higher incidence of carcinoma in females than males. Parotid gland lesions comprised 83.9% of all the salivary gland lesions analyzed, while submandibular gland lesions comprised 16.1%. In our study, the distribution between non-neoplastic, neoplastic benign, and neoplastic malignant lesions was 9.6%, 83.8%, and 6.4%. The overall diagnostic accuracy for non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions is 90.3%, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 100%. The segregation of the results into the positive and negative class of diagnostic outcomes shows 80.6% for true positive, 9.7% for true negative, 0% for false-positive, and 9.7% for false-negative reports. Diagnostic accuracy in differentiating non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions is 90.3%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.0% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in differentiating benign from malignant lesions in our study is 93.5% (29 out of 31), the sensitivity of FNAC in our study for diagnosing malignancy is poor, and the specificity is 100%. It can be concluded that FNAC is more accurate in diagnosing benign lesions and more specific than sensitive in diagnosing malignant lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37275112
doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03550-6
pii: 3550
pmc: PMC10234911
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
871-879Informations de copyright
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have a conflict of interest.
Références
Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Dec;39(12):913-6
pubmed: 21381225
Open Dent J. 2018 Sep 28;12:782-790
pubmed: 30369988
Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Jun;32(6):378-9
pubmed: 15880699
Head Neck. 2000 Dec;22(8):781-6
pubmed: 11084638
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):EC07-10
pubmed: 26266126
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Oct;125(10):757-766
pubmed: 28708928
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jul;136(1):45-59
pubmed: 21685031
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Nov;50(11):1408-1412
pubmed: 33618969
ISRN Surg. 2011;2011:721525
pubmed: 22084773
J Med Assoc Ga. 1996 Jan;85(1):33-6
pubmed: 8583186
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep - Oct;39(5):467-471
pubmed: 29778636
Diagn Cytopathol. 2015 Jun;43(6):495-509
pubmed: 25614439
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Mar;28(3):163-7
pubmed: 12619100
Acta Cytol. 2009 Jan-Feb;53(1):53-70
pubmed: 19248555
Acta Cytol. 1998 Jul-Aug;42(4):888-98
pubmed: 9684573
Malays J Pathol. 2015 Apr;37(1):11-8
pubmed: 25890608
Cytojournal. 2013 Jan 31;10:5
pubmed: 23599724
HNO. 2007 Mar;55(3):195-201
pubmed: 17333048
Diagn Cytopathol. 2010 Jul;38(7):499-504
pubmed: 19950398
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jul;58(3):246-8
pubmed: 23120304
An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am. 1999;26(1):15-27
pubmed: 10091361
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2013 Oct-Dec;11(44):296-9
pubmed: 24899323
Cancer. 1998 Jun 25;84(3):153-9
pubmed: 9678729
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1996 Dec;16(6):543-9
pubmed: 9381926
Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Aug;34(8):580-4
pubmed: 16850487
Head Neck. 2010 Dec;32(12):1635-40
pubmed: 20848407
Semin Diagn Pathol. 1986 Aug;3(3):219-26
pubmed: 3039635
Korean J Pathol. 2012 Dec;46(6):569-75
pubmed: 23323108
Australas Med J. 2011;4(2):66-71
pubmed: 23386881
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;155(3):431-6
pubmed: 27095051
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):FC01-3
pubmed: 25386436
Head Neck. 2021 Jun;43(6):1739-1746
pubmed: 33547678
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 Jan-Apr;21(1):46-50
pubmed: 28479686
Acta Cytol. 2004 Nov-Dec;48(6):849-52
pubmed: 15581172