Associations of four biological age markers with child development: A multi-omic analysis in the European HELIX cohort.
biological age
child development
computational biology
epidemiology
global health
human
omics
systems biology
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 06 2023
06 06 2023
Historique:
received:
22
11
2022
accepted:
06
06
2023
medline:
14
7
2023
pubmed:
6
6
2023
entrez:
6
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While biological age in adults is often understood as representing general health and resilience, the conceptual interpretation of accelerated biological age in children and its relationship to development remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the relationship of accelerated biological age, assessed through two established biological age indicators, telomere length and DNA methylation age, and two novel candidate biological age indicators, to child developmental outcomes, including growth and adiposity, cognition, behavior, lung function and the onset of puberty, among European school-age children participating in the HELIX exposome cohort. The study population included up to 1173 children, aged between 5 and 12 years, from study centres in the UK, France, Spain, Norway, Lithuania, and Greece. Telomere length was measured through qPCR, blood DNA methylation, and gene expression was measured using microarray, and proteins and metabolites were measured by a range of targeted assays. DNA methylation age was assessed using Horvath's skin and blood clock, while novel blood transcriptome and 'immunometabolic' (based on plasma proteins and urinary and serum metabolites) clocks were derived and tested in a subset of children assessed six months after the main follow-up visit. Associations between biological age indicators with child developmental measures as well as health risk factors were estimated using linear regression, adjusted for chronological age, sex, ethnicity, and study centre. The clock derived markers were expressed as Δ age (i.e. predicted minus chronological age). Transcriptome and immunometabolic clocks predicted chronological age well in the test set ( In children, as in adults, biological aging appears to be a multi-faceted process and adiposity is an important correlate of accelerated biological aging. Patterns of associations suggested that accelerated immunometabolic age may be beneficial for some aspects of child development while accelerated DNA methylation age and telomere attrition may reflect early detrimental aspects of biological aging, apparent even in children. UK Research and Innovation (MR/S03532X/1); European Commission (grant agreement numbers: 308333; 874583). Although age is generally measured by the number of years since birth, many factors contribute to the rate at which a person physically ages. In adults, linking these measurements to age gives a measure of overall health and resilience. This ‘biological age’ offers a better prediction of remaining life and disease risk than the number of years lived. Multiple factors can be used to calculate biological age, such as measuring the length of telomeres – protective caps on the end of chromosomes – which shorten as people age. The rate at which they shorten can give an indication of how quickly someone is ageing. Researchers can also study epigenetic factors: these mechanisms lead to certain genes being switched on or off, and they can be combined into a ‘epigenetic clock’ to assess biological age. However, compared with adults, the relationship between biological age and child health and developmental maturity is less well understood. Robinson et al. studied 1,173 school-aged children from six European countries, measuring telomere length, epigenetic factors and other biological indicators related to metabolism and the immune system. The relationships between these factors and an array of child developmental measures such as height, weight, behaviour and the age of onset of puberty were established. The findings showed that biological age indicators are only weakly linked to each other in children. Despite this, biological age was related to greater amount of body fat across all tested indicators – which is also associated with biological age in adults and is an important determinant of lifespan. Among several observed effects on development, analysis found that shorter telomere length and older epigenetic age were associated with greater behavioural problems, suggesting they may be detrimental to child development. On the other hand, a greater age due to metabolic and immune related changes was associated with greater cognitive and behavioural maturity. Environmental factors were also linked to biological ageing, with children exposed to smoking in their homes or while their mother was pregnant displaying an older epigenetic age. Robinson et al. showed that biological ageing in children is multifaceted and can have both beneficial and harmful impacts on development. This knowledge is important for identifying early life risk factors that might influence healthy ageing in later life. Future work will help researchers to understand these complex interactions and the long-term consequences for health and well-being.
Sections du résumé
Background
While biological age in adults is often understood as representing general health and resilience, the conceptual interpretation of accelerated biological age in children and its relationship to development remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the relationship of accelerated biological age, assessed through two established biological age indicators, telomere length and DNA methylation age, and two novel candidate biological age indicators, to child developmental outcomes, including growth and adiposity, cognition, behavior, lung function and the onset of puberty, among European school-age children participating in the HELIX exposome cohort.
Methods
The study population included up to 1173 children, aged between 5 and 12 years, from study centres in the UK, France, Spain, Norway, Lithuania, and Greece. Telomere length was measured through qPCR, blood DNA methylation, and gene expression was measured using microarray, and proteins and metabolites were measured by a range of targeted assays. DNA methylation age was assessed using Horvath's skin and blood clock, while novel blood transcriptome and 'immunometabolic' (based on plasma proteins and urinary and serum metabolites) clocks were derived and tested in a subset of children assessed six months after the main follow-up visit. Associations between biological age indicators with child developmental measures as well as health risk factors were estimated using linear regression, adjusted for chronological age, sex, ethnicity, and study centre. The clock derived markers were expressed as Δ age (i.e. predicted minus chronological age).
Results
Transcriptome and immunometabolic clocks predicted chronological age well in the test set (
Conclusions
In children, as in adults, biological aging appears to be a multi-faceted process and adiposity is an important correlate of accelerated biological aging. Patterns of associations suggested that accelerated immunometabolic age may be beneficial for some aspects of child development while accelerated DNA methylation age and telomere attrition may reflect early detrimental aspects of biological aging, apparent even in children.
Funding
UK Research and Innovation (MR/S03532X/1); European Commission (grant agreement numbers: 308333; 874583).
Although age is generally measured by the number of years since birth, many factors contribute to the rate at which a person physically ages. In adults, linking these measurements to age gives a measure of overall health and resilience. This ‘biological age’ offers a better prediction of remaining life and disease risk than the number of years lived. Multiple factors can be used to calculate biological age, such as measuring the length of telomeres – protective caps on the end of chromosomes – which shorten as people age. The rate at which they shorten can give an indication of how quickly someone is ageing. Researchers can also study epigenetic factors: these mechanisms lead to certain genes being switched on or off, and they can be combined into a ‘epigenetic clock’ to assess biological age. However, compared with adults, the relationship between biological age and child health and developmental maturity is less well understood. Robinson et al. studied 1,173 school-aged children from six European countries, measuring telomere length, epigenetic factors and other biological indicators related to metabolism and the immune system. The relationships between these factors and an array of child developmental measures such as height, weight, behaviour and the age of onset of puberty were established. The findings showed that biological age indicators are only weakly linked to each other in children. Despite this, biological age was related to greater amount of body fat across all tested indicators – which is also associated with biological age in adults and is an important determinant of lifespan. Among several observed effects on development, analysis found that shorter telomere length and older epigenetic age were associated with greater behavioural problems, suggesting they may be detrimental to child development. On the other hand, a greater age due to metabolic and immune related changes was associated with greater cognitive and behavioural maturity. Environmental factors were also linked to biological ageing, with children exposed to smoking in their homes or while their mother was pregnant displaying an older epigenetic age. Robinson et al. showed that biological ageing in children is multifaceted and can have both beneficial and harmful impacts on development. This knowledge is important for identifying early life risk factors that might influence healthy ageing in later life. Future work will help researchers to understand these complex interactions and the long-term consequences for health and well-being.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Although age is generally measured by the number of years since birth, many factors contribute to the rate at which a person physically ages. In adults, linking these measurements to age gives a measure of overall health and resilience. This ‘biological age’ offers a better prediction of remaining life and disease risk than the number of years lived. Multiple factors can be used to calculate biological age, such as measuring the length of telomeres – protective caps on the end of chromosomes – which shorten as people age. The rate at which they shorten can give an indication of how quickly someone is ageing. Researchers can also study epigenetic factors: these mechanisms lead to certain genes being switched on or off, and they can be combined into a ‘epigenetic clock’ to assess biological age. However, compared with adults, the relationship between biological age and child health and developmental maturity is less well understood. Robinson et al. studied 1,173 school-aged children from six European countries, measuring telomere length, epigenetic factors and other biological indicators related to metabolism and the immune system. The relationships between these factors and an array of child developmental measures such as height, weight, behaviour and the age of onset of puberty were established. The findings showed that biological age indicators are only weakly linked to each other in children. Despite this, biological age was related to greater amount of body fat across all tested indicators – which is also associated with biological age in adults and is an important determinant of lifespan. Among several observed effects on development, analysis found that shorter telomere length and older epigenetic age were associated with greater behavioural problems, suggesting they may be detrimental to child development. On the other hand, a greater age due to metabolic and immune related changes was associated with greater cognitive and behavioural maturity. Environmental factors were also linked to biological ageing, with children exposed to smoking in their homes or while their mother was pregnant displaying an older epigenetic age. Robinson et al. showed that biological ageing in children is multifaceted and can have both beneficial and harmful impacts on development. This knowledge is important for identifying early life risk factors that might influence healthy ageing in later life. Future work will help researchers to understand these complex interactions and the long-term consequences for health and well-being.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37278618
doi: 10.7554/eLife.85104
pii: 85104
pmc: PMC10338035
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S03532X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2023, Robinson et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
OR, CL, SJ, SA, EB, Pd, LC, HK, RG, KG, LM, DM, ES, VS, JU, MV, JW, TN, MB, MV No competing interests declared
Références
Elife. 2021 Feb 09;10:
pubmed: 33558008
Science. 2021 Aug 13;373(6556):808-812
pubmed: 34385400
Anal Chem. 2017 Jan 3;89(1):656-665
pubmed: 27959516
Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Jul 18;10(1):96
pubmed: 30021623
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1392-1393k
pubmed: 29040580
Genome Biol. 2013;14(10):R115
pubmed: 24138928
Anal Chem. 2006 Jul 1;78(13):4281-90
pubmed: 16808434
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jun;122(6):535-44
pubmed: 24610234
Epigenetics. 2018;13(1):85-94
pubmed: 29235933
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Sep;19(9):1813-7
pubmed: 21681223
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Jun;19(6):371-384
pubmed: 29643443
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;187(6):1220-1230
pubmed: 29149257
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003 Jul-Sep;4(3):259-66
pubmed: 14507248
Cell. 2013 Jun 6;153(6):1194-217
pubmed: 23746838
BMC Med. 2016 Oct 18;14(1):148
pubmed: 27751173
Aging Cell. 2020 Feb;19(2):e13080
pubmed: 31833194
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):118-27
pubmed: 16632515
PLoS One. 2014 May 07;9(5):e94385
pubmed: 24804734
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020 Oct;13(5):541-547
pubmed: 33079603
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Dec;23(12):715-727
pubmed: 35715611
Clin Epigenetics. 2016 Jun 03;8:64
pubmed: 27274774
Nat Med. 2019 Dec;25(12):1843-1850
pubmed: 31806903
EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:29-36
pubmed: 28396265
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1388-96
pubmed: 25617346
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Feb;37(3):e21
pubmed: 19129229
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;31(3):652-658
pubmed: 33236090
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):549-558
pubmed: 28089957
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;34(10):979-982
pubmed: 31342230
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 Feb 14;9:20
pubmed: 28289477
Environ Pollut. 2021 Sep 1;284:117404
pubmed: 34077897
J Proteome Res. 2016 Feb 5;15(2):400-10
pubmed: 26652958
Elife. 2021 May 13;10:
pubmed: 33982659
Exp Gerontol. 2014 Mar;51:15-27
pubmed: 24365661
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Jul;62(7):717-21
pubmed: 17634317
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;92:47-54
pubmed: 28407508
Nat Aging. 2021 Jul;1:598-615
pubmed: 34888528
Bioinformatics. 2021 Jul 19;37(12):1759-1760
pubmed: 32960939
Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul;28(4):485-95
pubmed: 24588700
Environ Int. 2021 Oct;155:106683
pubmed: 34144479
Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 22;6:8570
pubmed: 26490707
J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:193-199.e5
pubmed: 32586523
Aging Cell. 2020 Jun;19(6):e13149
pubmed: 32363781
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 20;19(1):150
pubmed: 34281550
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Nov;13(11):1141-51
pubmed: 23084519
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):
pubmed: 36041879
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 1;180(1):29-40
pubmed: 24920784
Neuropsychology. 2014 Jul;28(4):519-29
pubmed: 24819069
BMC Med. 2018 Nov 8;16(1):202
pubmed: 30404627
Genome Biol. 2015 Feb 15;16:37
pubmed: 25853392
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e021311
pubmed: 30206078
Elife. 2020 May 05;9:
pubmed: 32367804
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Mar;6(3):1282-97
pubmed: 19440446
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):660-7
pubmed: 18026621
BMC Med. 2020 Aug 19;18(1):243
pubmed: 32811491
Pediatr Res. 2002 Sep;52(3):377-81
pubmed: 12193671
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016 Apr 01;6(4):a025163
pubmed: 26931460
Aging (Albany NY). 2016 Sep 28;8(9):1844-1865
pubmed: 27690265
Cell. 2016 Aug 11;166(4):802-821
pubmed: 27518560
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Jan 21;11(2):303-327
pubmed: 30669119
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):382-8
pubmed: 27063603
Front Mol Neurosci. 2015 Jul 10;8:28
pubmed: 26217174
Nature. 2017 Feb 8;542(7640):177-185
pubmed: 28179656
Public Health Nutr. 2004 Oct;7(7):931-5
pubmed: 15482620
Nat Med. 2009 Sep;15(9):1082-7
pubmed: 19718037
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Feb;3(2):e81-e92
pubmed: 30737192
Psychosom Med. 2011 Sep;73(7):533-40
pubmed: 21873585
Aging (Albany NY). 2022 Jan 24;14(2):623-659
pubmed: 35073279
Genome Biol. 2014 Dec 03;15(12):503
pubmed: 25599564
Bioinformatics. 2014 Jul 15;30(14):2084-5
pubmed: 24659105
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 08;6(15):eaay5969
pubmed: 32284996
Bioinformatics. 2014 Dec 1;30(23):3435-7
pubmed: 25147358
J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):117-33
pubmed: 24277579
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jan;63:103164
pubmed: 33422989
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Feb;54(2):97-103
pubmed: 10715741
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):978-91
pubmed: 23064411
Eur Respir J. 2012 Dec;40(6):1324-43
pubmed: 22743675
Genome Med. 2019 Aug 23;11(1):54
pubmed: 31443728
Aging (Albany NY). 2018 Jul 26;10(7):1758-1775
pubmed: 30048243
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 22;117(38):23329-23335
pubmed: 31611402
Epigenetics. 2013 Feb;8(2):203-9
pubmed: 23314698
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;41(4):930-40
pubmed: 21471022
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Apr 14;11(7):2045-2070
pubmed: 31009935
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 17;9(1):10359
pubmed: 31316106
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;45(2):353-63
pubmed: 26283636
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2023 Jun;54(3):672-682
pubmed: 34727279
Transl Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 16;5:e581
pubmed: 26080316
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Apr 17;73(5):588-595
pubmed: 28958036
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May;96(5):1500-5
pubmed: 21349907