Does the feedback of blood results in observational studies influence response and consent? A randomised study of the Understanding Society Innovation Panel.

Demography Feedback Longitudinal study Mode Response rates Socioeconomic factors

Journal

BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 06 2023
Historique:
received: 11 07 2022
accepted: 11 05 2023
medline: 8 6 2023
pubmed: 7 6 2023
entrez: 6 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While medical studies generally provide health feedback to participants, in observational studies this is not always the case due to logistical and financial difficulties, or concerns about changing observed behaviours. However, evidence suggests that lack of feedback may deter participants from providing biological samples. This paper investigates the effect of offering feedback of blood results on participation in biomeasure sample collection. Participants aged 16 and over from a longitudinal study - the Understanding Society Innovation Panel-were randomised to three arms - nurse interviewer, interviewer, web survey - and invited to participate in biomeasures data collection. Within each arm they were randomised to receive feedback of their blood results or not. For those interviewed by a nurse both venous and dried blood samples (DBS) were taken in the interview. For the other two arms, they were asked if they would be willing to take a sample, and if they agreed a DBS kit was left or sent to them so the participant could take their own sample and return it. Blood samples were analysed and, if in the feedback arms, participants were sent their total cholesterol and HbA1c results. Response rates for feedback and non-feedback groups were compared: overall; in each arm of the study; by socio-demographic and health characteristics; and by previous study participation. Logistic regression models of providing a blood sample by feedback group and data collection approach controlling for confounders were calculated. Overall 2162 (80.3% of individuals in responding households) took part in the survey; of those 1053 (48.7%) consented to provide a blood sample. Being offered feedback had little effect on overall participation but did increase consent to provide a blood sample (unadjusted OR 1.38; CI: 1.16-1.64). Controlling for participant characteristics, the effect of feedback was highest among web participants (1.55; 1.11-2.17), followed by interview participants (1.35; 0.99 -1.84) and then nurse interview participants (1.30; 0.89-1.92). Offering feedback of blood results increased willingness to give samples, especially for those taking part in a web survey.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
While medical studies generally provide health feedback to participants, in observational studies this is not always the case due to logistical and financial difficulties, or concerns about changing observed behaviours. However, evidence suggests that lack of feedback may deter participants from providing biological samples. This paper investigates the effect of offering feedback of blood results on participation in biomeasure sample collection.
METHODS
Participants aged 16 and over from a longitudinal study - the Understanding Society Innovation Panel-were randomised to three arms - nurse interviewer, interviewer, web survey - and invited to participate in biomeasures data collection. Within each arm they were randomised to receive feedback of their blood results or not. For those interviewed by a nurse both venous and dried blood samples (DBS) were taken in the interview. For the other two arms, they were asked if they would be willing to take a sample, and if they agreed a DBS kit was left or sent to them so the participant could take their own sample and return it. Blood samples were analysed and, if in the feedback arms, participants were sent their total cholesterol and HbA1c results. Response rates for feedback and non-feedback groups were compared: overall; in each arm of the study; by socio-demographic and health characteristics; and by previous study participation. Logistic regression models of providing a blood sample by feedback group and data collection approach controlling for confounders were calculated.
RESULTS
Overall 2162 (80.3% of individuals in responding households) took part in the survey; of those 1053 (48.7%) consented to provide a blood sample. Being offered feedback had little effect on overall participation but did increase consent to provide a blood sample (unadjusted OR 1.38; CI: 1.16-1.64). Controlling for participant characteristics, the effect of feedback was highest among web participants (1.55; 1.11-2.17), followed by interview participants (1.35; 0.99 -1.84) and then nurse interview participants (1.30; 0.89-1.92).
CONCLUSIONS
Offering feedback of blood results increased willingness to give samples, especially for those taking part in a web survey.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37280544
doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01948-y
pii: 10.1186/s12874-023-01948-y
pmc: PMC10244078
doi:

Types de publication

Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

134

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2345-52
pubmed: 23031604
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Feb 19;17:100543
pubmed: 32140610
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 31;22(1):23
pubmed: 36721141
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:249
pubmed: 21504610
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):224
pubmed: 31426756
BMJ. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):206-10
pubmed: 16401631
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jan 27;11:10
pubmed: 21272336
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Jul;7(3):84-90
pubmed: 22850146
PLoS Med. 2011 Jun;8(6):e1000440
pubmed: 21695075

Auteurs

Michaela Benzeval (M)

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. mbenzeval@essex.ac.uk.

Alexandria Andrayas (A)

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Jan Mazza (J)

European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.

Tarek Al Baghal (T)

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Jonathan Burton (J)

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Thomas F Crossley (TF)

European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.

Meena Kumari (M)

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH