Functionality of technical working groups in enabling evidence-informed decision-making within Malawi's Ministry of Health: a cross-sectional qualitative study.
Decision-making
Evidence
Functionality
Health policy
LMIC
Technical advisory groups
Technical working groups
Journal
Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2023
06 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
01
02
2022
accepted:
02
05
2023
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
7
6
2023
entrez:
6
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The roles and functionality of technical working groups (TWGs) in the health sectors vary across countries, still they aim to support government and ministries in formulating evidence-informed recommendations for policies and facilitate dialogue and alignment of activities among stakeholders within the health sector. Thus, TWGs have a role in enhancing the functionality and effectiveness of the health system structure. However, in Malawi, the functionality of TWGs and how they utilize research evidence to contribute to decision-making is not monitored. This study sought to understand the TWGs' performance and functionality in enabling evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) in Malawi's health sector. A cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected through interviews, documents review and observation of three TWG meetings. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach. The WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) was used to guide the assessment of TWG functionality. TWG functionality varied in the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Malawi. The reasons for those perceived to be functioning well included meeting frequently, diverse representation of members, and that their recommendations to MoH were usually considered when decisions were made. For the TWGs that were perceived as not functioning well, the main reasons included lack of funding, periodic meetings and discussions that needed to provide clear decisions on the actions to be taken. In addition, evidence was recognized as important in decision-making, and research was valued by decision-makers within the MoH. However, some of the TWGs lacked reliable mechanisms for generating, accessing and synthesizing research. They also needed more capacity to review and use the research to inform their decisions. TWGs are highly valued and play a critical role in strengthening EIDM within the MoH. Our paper highlights the complexity and barriers of TWG functionality in supporting pathways for health policy-making in Malawi. These results have implications for EIDM in the health sector. This suggests that the MoH should actively develop reliable interventions and evidence tools, strengthen capacity-building and increase funding for EIDM.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The roles and functionality of technical working groups (TWGs) in the health sectors vary across countries, still they aim to support government and ministries in formulating evidence-informed recommendations for policies and facilitate dialogue and alignment of activities among stakeholders within the health sector. Thus, TWGs have a role in enhancing the functionality and effectiveness of the health system structure. However, in Malawi, the functionality of TWGs and how they utilize research evidence to contribute to decision-making is not monitored. This study sought to understand the TWGs' performance and functionality in enabling evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) in Malawi's health sector.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected through interviews, documents review and observation of three TWG meetings. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic approach. The WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) was used to guide the assessment of TWG functionality.
RESULTS
RESULTS
TWG functionality varied in the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Malawi. The reasons for those perceived to be functioning well included meeting frequently, diverse representation of members, and that their recommendations to MoH were usually considered when decisions were made. For the TWGs that were perceived as not functioning well, the main reasons included lack of funding, periodic meetings and discussions that needed to provide clear decisions on the actions to be taken. In addition, evidence was recognized as important in decision-making, and research was valued by decision-makers within the MoH. However, some of the TWGs lacked reliable mechanisms for generating, accessing and synthesizing research. They also needed more capacity to review and use the research to inform their decisions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
TWGs are highly valued and play a critical role in strengthening EIDM within the MoH. Our paper highlights the complexity and barriers of TWG functionality in supporting pathways for health policy-making in Malawi. These results have implications for EIDM in the health sector. This suggests that the MoH should actively develop reliable interventions and evidence tools, strengthen capacity-building and increase funding for EIDM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37280657
doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00987-7
pii: 10.1186/s12961-023-00987-7
pmc: PMC10243690
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Glob Chall. 2018 Jun 28;2(9):1800022
pubmed: 31565350
Vaccine. 2015 Jan 29;33(5):588-95
pubmed: 25545597
Vaccine. 2013 May 28;31(23):2653-7
pubmed: 23398930
Vaccine. 2017 Dec 15;35(50):6925-6930
pubmed: 29103592
Vaccine. 2010 Apr 19;28 Suppl 1:A88-90
pubmed: 20413005
Vaccine. 2018 Sep 5;36(37):5536-5543
pubmed: 30076103
Vaccine. 2013 Nov 4;31(46):5314-20
pubmed: 24055304
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jun 3;14(6):1539-1541
pubmed: 29470931
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 14;37(3):430-434
pubmed: 30545715
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 3;7(1):181
pubmed: 30390711
Health Policy Plan. 2019 May 1;34(4):271-281
pubmed: 31074778
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Dec 08;13:73
pubmed: 26646212
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Apr 22;18(1):40
pubmed: 32321521
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(10):2447-2451
pubmed: 29771634
Glob Chall. 2018 Sep 27;2(9):1800020
pubmed: 30345073
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 19;17(1):101
pubmed: 31856848