Managers perception of hospital employees' effort-reward imbalance.
Criterion validity
Effort-reward imbalance
Employees
External assessment
Hospital
Managers
Journal
Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)
ISSN: 1745-6673
Titre abrégé: J Occup Med Toxicol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245790
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2023
06 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
07
03
2023
accepted:
25
05
2023
medline:
7
6
2023
pubmed:
7
6
2023
entrez:
6
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hospitals are frequently associated with poor working conditions that can lead to work stress and increase the risk for reduced employee well-being. Managers can shape and improve working conditions and thereby, the health of their teams. Thus, as a prerequisite, managers need to be aware of their employees' stress levels. This study had two objectives: At first, it aimed to test the criterion validity of the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire measuring psychosocial workload in hospital employees. Secondly, mean scales of the ERI questionnaire filled in by employees were compared with mean scales of an adapted ERI questionnaire, in which managers assessed working conditions of their employees. Managers (n = 141) from three hospitals located in Germany assessed working conditions of their employees with an adapted external, other-oriented questionnaire. Employees (n = 197) of the mentioned hospitals completed the short version of the ERI questionnaire to assess their working conditions. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were applied to test factorial validity, using the ERI scales for the two study groups. Criterion validity was assessed with multiple linear regression analysis of associations between ERI scales and well-being among employees. The questionnaires demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency of scales, although some indices of model fit resulting from CFA were of borderline significance. Concerning the first objective, effort, reward, and the ratio of effort-reward imbalance were significantly associated with well-being of employees. With regard to the second objective, first tentative findings showed that managers' ratings of their employees' effort at work was quite accurate, whereas their reward was overestimated. With its documented criterion validity the ERI questionnaire can be used as a screening tool of workload among hospital employees. Moreover, in the context of work-related health promotion, managers' perceptions of their employees' workload deserve increased attention as first findings point to some discrepancies between their perceptions and those provided by employees.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37280659
doi: 10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4
pii: 10.1186/s12995-023-00376-4
pmc: PMC10246112
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
8Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 17;19(1):1694
pubmed: 31847898
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 18;16:342
pubmed: 27090211
J Occup Health. 2012;54(2):119-30
pubmed: 22313863
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Feb;94(2):203-220
pubmed: 33011902
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Jul-Sep;32(3):203-12
pubmed: 17666991
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Jan;133(1-2):26-9
pubmed: 18095206
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Apr;34(1):128-36
pubmed: 11430600
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 May;47(5):569-76
pubmed: 19909954
Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):995-1000
pubmed: 19934755
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Oct 3;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):
pubmed: 36175134
Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):314-9
pubmed: 16621851
Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42
pubmed: 3421392
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Apr;107(14):248-53
pubmed: 20436777
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):432-40
pubmed: 25796117
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 May 3;:
pubmed: 29722057
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 13;17(14):
pubmed: 32668816
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76
pubmed: 25831962
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Mar;20(1):26-34
pubmed: 16489957
Ann Surg. 2009 Sep;250(3):463-71
pubmed: 19730177
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Jun;3(3):233-237
pubmed: 24865886
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Aug;50(8):904-15
pubmed: 18695449
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):15-27
pubmed: 22409390
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Nov 02;15:195
pubmed: 26525409
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13
pubmed: 26653297
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41
pubmed: 9547031
Am J Ind Med. 2013 Dec;56(12):1414-22
pubmed: 24038041
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):363-85
pubmed: 19781702
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 13;17(12):e0278597
pubmed: 36512621
Work. 2018;61(4):551-560
pubmed: 30475783
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
J Nurs Care Qual. 2018 Oct/Dec;33(4):361-367
pubmed: 29266044
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 May;88(4):511-9
pubmed: 25228139
Occup Environ Med. 2010 Aug;67(8):526-31
pubmed: 20573847
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Sep;55(9):808-15
pubmed: 22298287
Psychiatr Prax. 2022 Apr;49(3):128-137
pubmed: 34015853
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 May;60(3):231-3
pubmed: 19951997
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6
pubmed: 25384822
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Aug;82(8):1005-13
pubmed: 19018554
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Oct;1(4):382-90
pubmed: 9547060
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):129-146
pubmed: 27871627
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(5):1032-1041
pubmed: 31132216