International stakeholder perspectives on One Health training and empowerment: a needs assessment for a One Health Workforce Academy.
Assessment
Competency framework
Continuing professional development
Credential
Education
Employers
Employment
One Health
Stakeholders
Training
University networks
Workforce
Journal
One health outlook
ISSN: 2524-4655
Titre abrégé: One Health Outlook
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101769253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2023
06 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
08
11
2022
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
7
6
2023
pubmed:
7
6
2023
entrez:
6
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One Health is defined as an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems; this approach attracts stakeholders from multiple sectors, academic disciplines, and professional practices. The diversity of expertise and interest groups is frequently and simultaneously framed as (1) a strength of the One Health approach in the process of understanding and solving complex problems associated with health challenges such as pathogen spillovers and pandemics and (2) a challenge regarding consensus on essential functions of One Health and the sets of knowledge, skills, and perspectives unique to a workforce adopting this approach. Progress in developing competency-based training in One Health has revealed coverage of various topics across fundamental, technical, functional, and integrative domains. Ensuring that employers value the unique characteristics of personnel trained in One Health will likely require demonstration of its usefulness, accreditation, and continuing professional development. These needs led to the conceptual framework of a One Health Workforce Academy (OHWA) for use as a platform to deliver competency-based training and assessment for an accreditable credential in One Health and opportunities for continuing professional development. To gather information about the desirability of an OHWA, we conducted a survey of One Health stakeholders. The IRB-approved research protocol used an online tool to collect individual responses to the survey questions. Potential respondents were recruited from partners of One Health University Networks in Africa and Southeast Asia and international respondents outside of these networks. Survey questions collected demographic information, measured existing or projected demand and the relative importance of One Health competencies, and determined the potential benefits and barriers of earning a credential. Respondents were not compensated for participation. Respondents (N = 231) from 24 countries reported differences in their perspectives on the relative importance of competency domains of the One Health approach. More than 90% of the respondents would seek to acquire a competency-based certificate in One Health, and 60% of respondents expected that earning such a credential would be rewarded by employers. Among potential barriers, time and funding were the most cited. This study showed strong support from potential stakeholders for a OHWA that hosts competency-based training with opportunities for certification and continuing professional development.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
One Health is defined as an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems; this approach attracts stakeholders from multiple sectors, academic disciplines, and professional practices. The diversity of expertise and interest groups is frequently and simultaneously framed as (1) a strength of the One Health approach in the process of understanding and solving complex problems associated with health challenges such as pathogen spillovers and pandemics and (2) a challenge regarding consensus on essential functions of One Health and the sets of knowledge, skills, and perspectives unique to a workforce adopting this approach. Progress in developing competency-based training in One Health has revealed coverage of various topics across fundamental, technical, functional, and integrative domains. Ensuring that employers value the unique characteristics of personnel trained in One Health will likely require demonstration of its usefulness, accreditation, and continuing professional development. These needs led to the conceptual framework of a One Health Workforce Academy (OHWA) for use as a platform to deliver competency-based training and assessment for an accreditable credential in One Health and opportunities for continuing professional development.
METHODS
METHODS
To gather information about the desirability of an OHWA, we conducted a survey of One Health stakeholders. The IRB-approved research protocol used an online tool to collect individual responses to the survey questions. Potential respondents were recruited from partners of One Health University Networks in Africa and Southeast Asia and international respondents outside of these networks. Survey questions collected demographic information, measured existing or projected demand and the relative importance of One Health competencies, and determined the potential benefits and barriers of earning a credential. Respondents were not compensated for participation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Respondents (N = 231) from 24 countries reported differences in their perspectives on the relative importance of competency domains of the One Health approach. More than 90% of the respondents would seek to acquire a competency-based certificate in One Health, and 60% of respondents expected that earning such a credential would be rewarded by employers. Among potential barriers, time and funding were the most cited.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study showed strong support from potential stakeholders for a OHWA that hosts competency-based training with opportunities for certification and continuing professional development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37280666
doi: 10.1186/s42522-023-00083-4
pii: 10.1186/s42522-023-00083-4
pmc: PMC10243688
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
8Subventions
Organisme : United States Agency for International Development
ID : 7200AA19CA00018
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;36(3):233-9
pubmed: 23260374
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Sep 1;101(3-4):148-56
pubmed: 20832879
Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):673-687
pubmed: 36682374
J Vet Med Educ. 2006 Fall;33(3):352-60
pubmed: 17035206
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 29;6:33799
pubmed: 27906122
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 29;6:33703
pubmed: 27906121
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 May 31;4(2):
pubmed: 31159338
One Health. 2019 Oct 17;8:100108
pubmed: 31720358
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Mar 26;87(1):30
pubmed: 33816135
Ecohealth. 2020 Jun;17(2):222-232
pubmed: 32685999
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jun;2(6):e238-e239
pubmed: 29880152
Front Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;4:192
pubmed: 27679794
Vet Rec. 2014 Jan 25;174(4):85-91
pubmed: 24464377
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(6):
pubmed: 35649633
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(4):250-257
pubmed: 33009732