Application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in adrenal surgery: A retrospective, preliminary analysis.

Adrenalectomy endocrine surgery enhanced recovery after surgery laparoscopic mini-invasive

Journal

Journal of minimal access surgery
ISSN: 0972-9941
Titre abrégé: J Minim Access Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101228183

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2023
Historique:
medline: 7 6 2023
pubmed: 7 6 2023
entrez: 7 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for primary and secondary adrenal disease, in reducing the length of primary hospital stay and return to daily activities. This retrospective study was carried out on 61 patients who underwent LA. A total of 32 patients formed the ERAS group. A total of 29 patients received conventional perioperative care and were assigned as the control group. Groups were compared in terms of patient's characteristics (sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, side of tumour, tumour size and co-morbidities), post-operative compliance (anaesthesia time, operative time, post-operative stay, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) score, analgesic assumption and days to return to daily activities) and post-operative complications. Results: No significant differences in anaesthesia time (P = 0.4) and operative time (P = 0.6) were reported. NRS score 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ERAS group (P < 0.05). The analgesic assumption in post-operative period in the ERAS group was lower (P < 0.05). ERAS protocol led to a significantly shorter length of post-operative stay (P < 0.05) and to return to daily activities (P < 0.05). No differences in peri-operative complications were reported. ERAS protocols seem safe and feasible, potentially improving perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LA, mainly improving pain control, hospital stay and return to daily activities. Further studies are needed to investigate overall compliance with ERAS protocols and their impact on clinical outcomes.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) for primary and secondary adrenal disease, in reducing the length of primary hospital stay and return to daily activities.
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
This retrospective study was carried out on 61 patients who underwent LA. A total of 32 patients formed the ERAS group. A total of 29 patients received conventional perioperative care and were assigned as the control group. Groups were compared in terms of patient's characteristics (sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, side of tumour, tumour size and co-morbidities), post-operative compliance (anaesthesia time, operative time, post-operative stay, post-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) score, analgesic assumption and days to return to daily activities) and post-operative complications. Results: No significant differences in anaesthesia time (P = 0.4) and operative time (P = 0.6) were reported. NRS score 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the ERAS group (P < 0.05). The analgesic assumption in post-operative period in the ERAS group was lower (P < 0.05). ERAS protocol led to a significantly shorter length of post-operative stay (P < 0.05) and to return to daily activities (P < 0.05). No differences in peri-operative complications were reported.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
ERAS protocols seem safe and feasible, potentially improving perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LA, mainly improving pain control, hospital stay and return to daily activities. Further studies are needed to investigate overall compliance with ERAS protocols and their impact on clinical outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37282440
pii: 377428
doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_319_22
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Auteurs

Giulio Lelli (G)

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Alessandra Micalizzi (A)

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Angelo Iossa (A)

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Alessia Fassari (A)

General Surgery Unit, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Europe, Luxembourg.

Antonio Concistre (A)

Department of Cinical, Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Francesco Circosta (F)

Department of Cinical, Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Luigi Petramala (L)

Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Francesco De Angelis (F)

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Claudio Letizia (C)

Department of Cinical, Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Giuseppe Cavallaro (G)

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH