16 Reliability and efficiency of corneal thickness measurements using sterile donor tomography in the eye bank.


Journal

BMJ open ophthalmology
ISSN: 2397-3269
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101714806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
medline: 8 6 2023
pubmed: 7 6 2023
entrez: 7 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the reliability and efficiency of sterile corneal thickness measurements of donor corneas stored in a plastic culture flask filled with organ culture medium I (MI) or II (MII) based on tomographic data using two different software: the built-in software of the anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) and a MATLAB self-programmed software. Twenty-five (25) donor corneas (50%) stored in MI and 25 (50%) in MII were imaged 5 times consecutively using an AS-OCT. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured both with the manual measurement tool of the AS-OCT (=CCTm) and with a MATLAB self-programmed software allowing (semi-)automated analysis (=CCTa). We analyzed the reliability of CCTm and CCTa using Cronbach´s alpha (α) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Concerning CCTm, 68 measurements (54.4%) in MI and 46 (36.8%) in MII presented distortions in the imaged 3D-volumes and were discarded. Concerning CCTa, 5 (4%) in MI and 1 (0.8%) in MII were not analyzable. The mean (± SD) CCTm was 1129 ± 6.8 in MI and 820 ± 5.1 µm in MII. The mean CCTa was 1149 ± 2.7 and 811 ± 2.4 µm, respectively. Both methods showed a high reliability with a Cronbach´s α for CCTm of 1.0 (MI/MII) and for CCTa of 0.99 (MI) and 1.0 (MII). Nevertheless, the mean SD of the 5 measurements was significantly higher for CCTm compared to CCTa in MI (p = 0.03), but not in MII (p = 0.92). Sterile donor tomography proves to be highly reliable for assessment of CCT with both methods. However, due to frequent distortions regarding the manual method, the (semi-)automated method seems to be more efficient and should be preferred.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37282706
pii: bmjophth-2022-EEBA.16
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-EEBA.16
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

A7

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Auteurs

Loïc Hamon (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Adrien Quintin (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Stephanie Mäurer (S)

Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Isabel Weinstein (I)

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Achim Langenbucher (A)

Institute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Berthold Seitz (B)

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Loay Daas (L)

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH