Morpho-anatomical determinants of yield potential in Olea europaea L. cultivars belonging to diversified origin grown in semi-arid environments.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
24
12
2022
accepted:
17
05
2023
medline:
9
6
2023
pubmed:
7
6
2023
entrez:
7
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant performance is mainly estimated based on plant architecture, leaf features and internal microstructural changes. Olive (Olea europaea L.) is a drought tolerant, oil yielding, and medium sized woody tree that shows specific structural and functional modifications under changing environment. This study was aimed to know the microstructural alteration involving in growth and yield responses of different Olive cultivars. Eleven cultivars were collected all over the world and were planted at Olive germplasm unit, Barani Agricultural Research Institute, Chakwal (Punjab) Pakistan, during September to November 2017. Plant material was collected to correlate morpho-anatomical traits with yield contributing characteristics. Overall, the studied morphological characters, yield and yield parameters, and root, stem and leaf anatomical features varied highly significantly in all olive cultivars. The most promising cultivar regarding yield was Erlik, in which plant height seed weight and root anatomical characteristics, i.e., epidermal thickness and phloem thickness, stem features like collenchymatous thickness, phloem thickness and metaxylem vessel diameter, and leaf traits like midrib thickness, palisade cell thickness a phloem thickness were the maximum. The second best Hamdi showed the maximum plant height, fruit length, weight and diameter and seed length and weight. It also showed maximum stem phloem thickness, midrib and lamina thicknesses, palisade cell thickness. Fruit yield in the studied olive cultivars can be more closely linked to high proportion of storage parenchyma, broader xylem vessels and phloem proportion, dermal tissue, and high proportion of collenchyma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37285364
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286736
pii: PONE-D-22-35252
pmc: PMC10246800
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0286736Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Ahmad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 13;8:1956
pubmed: 29181017
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 20;805:150364
pubmed: 34818800
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 16;10:427
pubmed: 31057569
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jan 13;73(2):511-528
pubmed: 34791168
Plants (Basel). 2022 May 25;11(11):
pubmed: 35684173
Development. 2016 Sep 15;143(18):3283-94
pubmed: 27624833
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Oct;45(10):2861-2874
pubmed: 35822342
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Dec 11;11:614144
pubmed: 33362839
Nat Prod Res. 2020 Jul;34(13):1951-1955
pubmed: 30784315
AoB Plants. 2022 Oct 18;14(6):plac050
pubmed: 36545297
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6):
pubmed: 33536333
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):318
pubmed: 34217217
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26209
pubmed: 22087223
Photosynth Res. 2015 Feb;123(2):141-55
pubmed: 25344757
Tree Physiol. 2016 Mar;36(3):380-91
pubmed: 26802540
J Exp Bot. 2017 Apr 1;68(8):2027-2036
pubmed: 28064176
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 10;8:1918
pubmed: 29176987
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Aug;39(8):1662-8
pubmed: 26650587
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;10(11):
pubmed: 34834679
Funct Plant Biol. 2016 Mar;43(2):114-128
pubmed: 32480446
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 29;13:824720
pubmed: 35574091
Tree Physiol. 2016 Dec;36(12):1550-1561
pubmed: 27614360
Plants (Basel). 2019 Jul 17;8(7):
pubmed: 31319621
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):288
pubmed: 32571226
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Jul;41(7):1579-1592
pubmed: 29574982
Biotechnol Adv. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5):687-696
pubmed: 26972849
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:361-81
pubmed: 16669766