Synchronized Diaphragmatic Stimulation for Heart Failure With a Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using the VisONE System: A First-in-Patient Study With Extended Population.
Acute cardiac hemodynamics
Heart failure
Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation
Journal
Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team
ISSN: 2474-8714
Titre abrégé: Struct Heart
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101743256
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
25
04
2022
revised:
14
08
2022
accepted:
04
09
2022
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
8
6
2023
entrez:
8
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation (SDS) produces localized contractions of the diaphragm gated to the cardiac cycle to transiently modulate intrathoracic pressures, thereby impacting cardiac function for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study prospectively evaluated the safety and 1-year effectiveness of SDS in an expanded first-in-patient cohort using multiple implant methods. Symptomatic patients with HFrEF despite guideline-directed therapy were enrolled. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months for adverse events, quality of life (SF-36 QOL), echocardiography and 6-minute hall walk distance. The SDS system consists of 2 bipolar, active-fixation leads, and an implantable pulse generator. Nineteen men were enrolled (age 63 [57, 67] years, New York Heart Association class II [53%]/III [47%], N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide 1779 [886, 2309] pg/mL, left ventricular ejection fraction 27 [23, 33] %). Three implant techniques (abdominal laparoscopy: sensing and stimulating leads on the inferior diaphragm (n = 15); subxiphoid access for an epicardial sensing lead and abdominal laparoscopy for stimulation on the inferior diaphragm (n = 2); thoracoscopy to place an epicardial sensing lead and a stimulating lead on the superior diaphragm (n = 2)) were employed with 100% success. Patients were unaware of diaphragmatic stimulation. From discharge to 12 months, 6-minute hall walk distance increased (315 [296, 332]m to 340 [319, 384]m; These data demonstrate that SDS can be delivered using alternative implantation methods without raising safety concerns and suggest improved outcomes over 1 year of follow-up. Adequately powered randomized trials are now needed to confirm these findings.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Synchronized diaphragmatic stimulation (SDS) produces localized contractions of the diaphragm gated to the cardiac cycle to transiently modulate intrathoracic pressures, thereby impacting cardiac function for heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study prospectively evaluated the safety and 1-year effectiveness of SDS in an expanded first-in-patient cohort using multiple implant methods.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Symptomatic patients with HFrEF despite guideline-directed therapy were enrolled. Patients were evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months for adverse events, quality of life (SF-36 QOL), echocardiography and 6-minute hall walk distance. The SDS system consists of 2 bipolar, active-fixation leads, and an implantable pulse generator.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Nineteen men were enrolled (age 63 [57, 67] years, New York Heart Association class II [53%]/III [47%], N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide 1779 [886, 2309] pg/mL, left ventricular ejection fraction 27 [23, 33] %). Three implant techniques (abdominal laparoscopy: sensing and stimulating leads on the inferior diaphragm (n = 15); subxiphoid access for an epicardial sensing lead and abdominal laparoscopy for stimulation on the inferior diaphragm (n = 2); thoracoscopy to place an epicardial sensing lead and a stimulating lead on the superior diaphragm (n = 2)) were employed with 100% success. Patients were unaware of diaphragmatic stimulation. From discharge to 12 months, 6-minute hall walk distance increased (315 [296, 332]m to 340 [319, 384]m;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
These data demonstrate that SDS can be delivered using alternative implantation methods without raising safety concerns and suggest improved outcomes over 1 year of follow-up. Adequately powered randomized trials are now needed to confirm these findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37288118
doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100103
pii: S2474-8706(22)01898-X
pmc: PMC10242567
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100103Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Références
Europace. 2009 Feb;11(2):191-9
pubmed: 19168496
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1677-1681
pubmed: 35297198
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;9(4):2207-2214
pubmed: 35619238
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Apr;54(4):950-5
pubmed: 6853301
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jul;7(7):574-585
pubmed: 31248569
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Apr;64(4):1518-26
pubmed: 3378986
Congest Heart Fail. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):147-52
pubmed: 20662866
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Apr;64(4):1506-17
pubmed: 3378985
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 31;78(9):931-956
pubmed: 34446165
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Mar;16(3):342-9
pubmed: 24464736
Chest. 1987 May;91(5):709-15
pubmed: 3552466
J Card Fail. 2017 Aug;23(8):628-651
pubmed: 28461259