Developing interpretable machine learning-Shapley additive explanations model for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soils stabilized with geopolymer.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 28 02 2023
accepted: 29 05 2023
medline: 12 6 2023
pubmed: 8 6 2023
entrez: 8 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This paper seeks to develop an interpretable Machine Learning (ML) model for predicting the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cohesive soils stabilized with geopolymer at 28 days. Four models including Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neuron Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Gradient Boosting (GB) are built. The database consists of 282 samples collected from the literature with three different types of cohesive soil stabilized with three geopolymer categories including Slag-based geopolymer cement, alkali-activated fly ash geopolymer and slag/fly ash-based geopolymer cement. The optimal model is selected by comparing their performances with each other. The values of hyperparameters are tuned by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm and K-Fold Cross Validation. Statistical indicators show the superior performance of the ANN model with three metrics performance such as coefficient of determination R2 = 0.9808, Root Mean Square Error RMSE = 0.8808 MPa and Mean Absolute Error MAE = 0.6344 MPa. In addition, a sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the influence of different input parameters on the UCS of cohesive soils stabilized with geopolymer. The order of feature effect can be ordered in descending order using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) value as follows: Ground granulated blast slag content (GGBFS) > Liquid limit (LL) > Alkali/Binder ratio (A/B) > Molarity (M) > Fly ash content (FA) > Na/Al > Si/Al. The ANN model can obtain the best accuracy using these seven inputs. LL has a negative correlation with the growth of unconfined compressive strength, whereas GGBFS has a positive correlation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37289821
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286950
pii: PONE-D-23-05947
pmc: PMC10249854
doi:

Substances chimiques

Coal Ash 0
Alkalies 0
Soil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0286950

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Ngo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Front Neurorobot. 2013 Dec 04;7:21
pubmed: 24409142
Chemosphere. 2021 Mar;267:128900
pubmed: 33234306
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265747
pubmed: 35312706

Auteurs

Anh Quan Ngo (AQ)

Hydraulic Construction Institute-Vietnam Academy For Water Resources, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Linh Quy Nguyen (LQ)

University of Transport Technology, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Van Quan Tran (VQ)

University of Transport Technology, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software

Understanding the role of machine learning in predicting progression of osteoarthritis.

Simone Castagno, Benjamin Gompels, Estelle Strangmark et al.
1.00
Humans Disease Progression Machine Learning Osteoarthritis
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction

Classifications MeSH