Safety and efficacy of lirentelimab in patients with refractory indolent systemic mastocytosis: a first-in-human clinical trial.
Journal
The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 10 2023
25 10 2023
Historique:
received:
02
02
2023
revised:
12
05
2023
accepted:
02
06
2023
medline:
27
10
2023
pubmed:
9
6
2023
entrez:
8
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is characterized by excessive mast cell (MC) accumulation and MC-driven signs and symptoms. Currently used therapies are not approved and have limited efficacy. Lirentelimab (AK002) is a monoclonal antibody against sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec)-8 that inhibits MC activation. To determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of lirentelimab in reducing the symptoms of ISM. At a specialty centre for mastocytosis in Germany, we conducted a phase I first-in-human single-ascending and multidose clinical trial of lirentelimab in patients with ISM. Eligible adults had World Health Organization-confirmed ISM and an unsatisfactory response to available treatment. In part A, patients received a single dose of lirentelimab 0.0003, 0.001, 0.003, 0.01 or 0.03 mg kg-1; in part B, patients received one lirentelimab dose of 0.3 mg kg-1 or 1.0 mg kg-1; and in part C, patients received either 1.0 mg kg-1 lirentelimab every 4 weeks for 6 months or ascending doses of lirentelimab (one dose of 1 mg kg-1 followed by five doses of 3-10 mg kg-1 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Mastocytosis Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ), Mastocytosis Activity Score (MAS) and Mastocytosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL) scores at 2 weeks after the final dose. In 25 patients with ISM (13 in parts A + B and 12 in part C; median age 51 years, 76% female, median 4.6 years from diagnosis), the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were feeling hot (76%) and experiencing a headache (48%). No serious AEs occurred. Median MSQ and MAS symptom severity scores in part C improved (vs. baseline) across all symptoms [MSQ: skin (38-56%), gastrointestinal (49-60%), neurological (47-59%), musculoskeletal (26-27%); MAS: skin (53-59%), gastrointestinal (72-85%), neurological (20-57%), musculoskeletal (25%)]. Median MC-QoL scores improved across all domains: symptoms (39%), social life/functioning (42%), emotions (57%) and skin (44%). Lirentelimab was generally well tolerated and improved symptoms and quality of life in patients with ISM. The therapeutic potential of lirentelimab should be considered for ISM.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is characterized by excessive mast cell (MC) accumulation and MC-driven signs and symptoms. Currently used therapies are not approved and have limited efficacy. Lirentelimab (AK002) is a monoclonal antibody against sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec)-8 that inhibits MC activation.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of lirentelimab in reducing the symptoms of ISM.
METHODS
At a specialty centre for mastocytosis in Germany, we conducted a phase I first-in-human single-ascending and multidose clinical trial of lirentelimab in patients with ISM. Eligible adults had World Health Organization-confirmed ISM and an unsatisfactory response to available treatment. In part A, patients received a single dose of lirentelimab 0.0003, 0.001, 0.003, 0.01 or 0.03 mg kg-1; in part B, patients received one lirentelimab dose of 0.3 mg kg-1 or 1.0 mg kg-1; and in part C, patients received either 1.0 mg kg-1 lirentelimab every 4 weeks for 6 months or ascending doses of lirentelimab (one dose of 1 mg kg-1 followed by five doses of 3-10 mg kg-1 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in Mastocytosis Symptom Questionnaire (MSQ), Mastocytosis Activity Score (MAS) and Mastocytosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL) scores at 2 weeks after the final dose.
RESULTS
In 25 patients with ISM (13 in parts A + B and 12 in part C; median age 51 years, 76% female, median 4.6 years from diagnosis), the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were feeling hot (76%) and experiencing a headache (48%). No serious AEs occurred. Median MSQ and MAS symptom severity scores in part C improved (vs. baseline) across all symptoms [MSQ: skin (38-56%), gastrointestinal (49-60%), neurological (47-59%), musculoskeletal (26-27%); MAS: skin (53-59%), gastrointestinal (72-85%), neurological (20-57%), musculoskeletal (25%)]. Median MC-QoL scores improved across all domains: symptoms (39%), social life/functioning (42%), emotions (57%) and skin (44%).
CONCLUSIONS
Lirentelimab was generally well tolerated and improved symptoms and quality of life in patients with ISM. The therapeutic potential of lirentelimab should be considered for ISM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37290787
pii: 7192419
doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad191
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase I
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
511-519Subventions
Organisme : Allakos, Inc
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest: All authors have completed the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare the following: F.S. was or currently is a speaker and/or advisor and has received honoraria and/or funding for research from Allakos, Blueprint, Celldex, Cogent, Genentech, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron and Uriach. S.A. is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Moxie, Novartis, Sanofi, Takeda and Thermo Fisher. M.M. is or recently was a speaker and/or advisor for and/or has received research funding from Allakos, Aralez, AstraZeneca, FAES, Genentech, Menarini, Moxie, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, UCB and Uriach. H.S.R. and B.S. were employees of Allakos, Inc. at the time of the study, own stocks and stock options and are named on patents for the company. A.M.K. was an employee of Allakos Inc., and owned stock and stock options at the time of the study. A.T.C. and B.A.Y. are employees of Allakos, Inc. and own stock options in the company. H.B. has received honoraria from Novartis for participation on an advisory board and as a speaker. T.H. is or recently was a speaker for Moxie. M.H. and E.G.M. declare no conflicts of interest.