A pilot study investigating affective forecasting biases with a novel virtual reality-based paradigm.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 06 2023
08 06 2023
Historique:
received:
27
11
2022
accepted:
01
06
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
9
6
2023
entrez:
8
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A body of research indicates that people are prone to overestimate the affective impact of future events. Here, we developed a novel experimental paradigm to study these affective forecasting biases under laboratory conditions using subjective (arousal and valence) and autonomic measures (skin conductance responses, SCRs, and heart rate). Thirty participants predicted their emotional responses to 15 unpleasant, 15 neutral, and 15 pleasant scenarios (affective forecasting phase) to which they were then exposed in virtual reality (emotional experience phase). Results showed that participants anticipated more extreme arousal and valence scores than they actually experienced for unpleasant and pleasant scenarios. The emotional experience phase was characterized by classic autonomic patterns, i.e., higher SCRs for emotionally arousing scenarios and greater peak cardiac acceleration for pleasant scenarios. During the affective forecasting phase, we found only a moderate association between arousal scores and SCRs and no valence-dependent modulation of cardiac activity. This paradigm opens up new perspectives for investigating affective forecasting abilities under lab-controlled conditions, notably in psychiatric disorders with anxious anticipations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37291205
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36346-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-36346-3
pmc: PMC10250404
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9321Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Brain Cogn. 2021 Jun;150:105708
pubmed: 33714004
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Sep;146:107525
pubmed: 32535130
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Apr 19;4:33
pubmed: 20428514
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jun;44(6):861-82
pubmed: 16126162
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):657-61
pubmed: 17700624
Emotion. 2022 Sep 08;:
pubmed: 36074619
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59
pubmed: 7962581
Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;19(9):865-73
pubmed: 18947351
Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1351-4
pubmed: 17823345
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Feb;14(2):143-52
pubmed: 23329161
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Apr;72(1):13-23
pubmed: 18938199
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jan;71(1):50-6
pubmed: 18723054
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):821-36
pubmed: 10821192
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):1-23
pubmed: 27798257
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):343-8
pubmed: 19537599
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 May 12;364(1521):1335-41
pubmed: 19528015
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Nov;29(11):1421-32
pubmed: 15189579
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;19(4):196-200
pubmed: 25726365
Psychophysiology. 1993 May;30(3):261-73
pubmed: 8497555
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):437-50
pubmed: 19879918
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 May;140(2):258-71
pubmed: 21401291
Emotion. 2013 Dec;13(6):1023-9
pubmed: 23914762
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jul;106:37-46
pubmed: 29758391
Behav Ther. 2020 May;51(3):365-374
pubmed: 32402253
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21
pubmed: 12885109
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57
pubmed: 17188554
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;38(7):895-906
pubmed: 22649114
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):276-98
pubmed: 12934687