Inferring chromosomal instability from copy number aberrations as a measure of chromosomal instability across human cancers.
Journal
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
Titre abrégé: bioRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101680187
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2023
16 Aug 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
9
6
2023
medline:
9
6
2023
entrez:
9
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer is a complex disease that is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Despite research efforts, the ability to manage cancer and select optimal therapeutic responses for each patient remains elusive. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is primarily a product of segregation errors wherein one or many chromosomes, in part or whole, vary in number. CIN is an enabling characteristic of cancer, contributes to tumor-cell heterogeneity, and plays a crucial role in the multistep tumorigenesis process, especially in tumor growth and initiation and in response to treatment. Multiple studies have reported different metrics for analyzing copy number aberrations as surrogates of CIN from DNA copy number variation data. However, these metrics differ in how they are calculated with respect to the type of variation, the magnitude of change, and the inclusion of breakpoints. Here we compared metrics capturing CIN as either numerical aberrations, structural aberrations, or a combination of the two across 33 cancer data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Using CIN inferred by methods in the CINmetrics R package, we evaluated how six copy number CIN surrogates compared across TCGA cohorts by assessing each across tumor types, as well as how they associate with tumor stage, metastasis, and nodal involvement, and with respect to patient sex. We found that the tumor type impacts how well any two given CIN metrics correlate. While we also identified overlap between metrics regarding their association with clinical characteristics and patient sex, there was not complete agreement between metrics. We identified several cases where only one CIN metric was significantly associated with a clinical characteristic or patient sex for a given tumor type. Therefore, caution should be used when describing CIN based on a given metric or comparing it to other studies.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Cancer is a complex disease that is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Despite research efforts, the ability to manage cancer and select optimal therapeutic responses for each patient remains elusive. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is primarily a product of segregation errors wherein one or many chromosomes, in part or whole, vary in number. CIN is an enabling characteristic of cancer, contributes to tumor-cell heterogeneity, and plays a crucial role in the multistep tumorigenesis process, especially in tumor growth and initiation and in response to treatment.
Aims
UNASSIGNED
Multiple studies have reported different metrics for analyzing copy number aberrations as surrogates of CIN from DNA copy number variation data. However, these metrics differ in how they are calculated with respect to the type of variation, the magnitude of change, and the inclusion of breakpoints. Here we compared metrics capturing CIN as either numerical aberrations, structural aberrations, or a combination of the two across 33 cancer data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
Methods and results
UNASSIGNED
Using CIN inferred by methods in the CINmetrics R package, we evaluated how six copy number CIN surrogates compared across TCGA cohorts by assessing each across tumor types, as well as how they associate with tumor stage, metastasis, and nodal involvement, and with respect to patient sex.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
We found that the tumor type impacts how well any two given CIN metrics correlate. While we also identified overlap between metrics regarding their association with clinical characteristics and patient sex, there was not complete agreement between metrics. We identified several cases where only one CIN metric was significantly associated with a clinical characteristic or patient sex for a given tumor type. Therefore, caution should be used when describing CIN based on a given metric or comparing it to other studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37292608
doi: 10.1101/2023.05.24.542174
pmc: PMC10245901
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R00 HG009678
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateIn
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Feb 15;11(2):
pubmed: 30781398
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Cancer Cell. 2007 Jan;11(1):25-36
pubmed: 17189716
Genome Biol. 2007;8(10):R215
pubmed: 17925008
Genes (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;13(4):
pubmed: 35456496
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 15;32(18):2847-9
pubmed: 27207943
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Dec 15;17(24):7704-11
pubmed: 22184286
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 20;14(10):
pubmed: 35626129
Cancer Discov. 2022 Jan;12(1):31-46
pubmed: 35022204
Cancer Res. 2011 May 15;71(10):3447-52
pubmed: 21270108
Nature. 2022 Dec;612(7938):106-115
pubmed: 36289342
J Clin Invest. 2012 Apr;122(4):1138-43
pubmed: 22466654
PeerJ. 2023 Apr 25;11:e15244
pubmed: 37123011
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Jan;21(1):44-62
pubmed: 31548659
Am J Psychol. 1987 Fall-Winter;100(3-4):441-71
pubmed: 3322052
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 12;10:321
pubmed: 32226775
Cancer Res. 2008 Jun 1;68(11):4479-85
pubmed: 18519711
EMBO Rep. 2012 Jun 01;13(6):528-38
pubmed: 22595889
Dev Cell. 2021 Sep 13;56(17):2427-2439.e4
pubmed: 34352222
Cancer Res. 2011 Mar 1;71(5):1858-70
pubmed: 21363922
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54356
pubmed: 23372714
Semin Cancer Biol. 2015 Dec;35 Suppl:S5-S24
pubmed: 25869442
Cell. 2022 Feb 3;185(3):563-575.e11
pubmed: 35120664
Genes (Basel). 2021 Apr 12;12(4):
pubmed: 33921421
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 May 5;44(8):e71
pubmed: 26704973
Trends Cancer. 2022 Jan;8(1):43-53
pubmed: 34593353
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7832):126-132
pubmed: 32879494
Nat Commun. 2021 May 27;12(1):3188
pubmed: 34045449
Trends Cancer. 2016 Oct;2(10):561-571
pubmed: 28741487
Cancer. 2018 May 15;124(10):2125-2133
pubmed: 29533459
Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 23;20(6):R285-95
pubmed: 20334839
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 16;9(1):e79079
pubmed: 24454681
Mol Cytogenet. 2019 May 14;12:17
pubmed: 31114634