Impact of Different Mammography Systems on Artificial Intelligence Performance in Breast Cancer Screening.
Breast
Computer Applications–Detection/Diagnosis
Mammography
Neoplasms-Primary
Screening
Technology Assessment
Journal
Radiology. Artificial intelligence
ISSN: 2638-6100
Titre abrégé: Radiol Artif Intell
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746556
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
revised:
14
02
2023
accepted:
02
03
2023
medline:
9
6
2023
pubmed:
9
6
2023
entrez:
9
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools may assist breast screening mammography programs, but limited evidence supports their generalizability to new settings. This retrospective study used a 3-year dataset (April 1, 2016-March 31, 2019) from a U.K. regional screening program. The performance of a commercially available breast screening AI algorithm was assessed with a prespecified and site-specific decision threshold to evaluate whether its performance was transferable to a new clinical site. The dataset consisted of women (aged approximately 50-70 years) who attended routine screening, excluding self-referrals, those with complex physical requirements, those who had undergone a previous mastectomy, and those who underwent screening that had technical recalls or did not have the four standard image views. In total, 55 916 screening attendees (mean age, 60 years ± 6 [SD]) met the inclusion criteria. The prespecified threshold resulted in high recall rates (48.3%, 21 929 of 45 444), which reduced to 13.0% (5896 of 45 444) following threshold calibration, closer to the observed service level (5.0%, 2774 of 55 916). Recall rates also increased approximately threefold following a software upgrade on the mammography equipment, requiring per-software version thresholds. Using software-specific thresholds, the AI algorithm would have recalled 277 of 303 (91.4%) screen-detected cancers and 47 of 138 (34.1%) interval cancers. AI performance and thresholds should be validated for new clinical settings before deployment, while quality assurance systems should monitor AI performance for consistency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37293340
doi: 10.1148/ryai.220146
pmc: PMC10245180
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e220146Informations de copyright
© 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosures of conflicts of interest: C.F.d.V. No relevant relationships. S.J.C. No relevant relationships. R.T.S. No relevant relationships. J.A.D. No relevant relationships. J.Y. Employed by Kheiron Medical Technologies; support for attending meetings/travel from Kheiron Medical Technologies; patents planned, issued, or pending with Kheiron Medical Technologies; stock or stock options in Kheiron Medical Technologies. D.D. Full-time employee of Kheiron Medical Technologies, supplier of the medical device evaluated in this project; grant from Innovate UK via iCAIRD, the industrial center for AI research in digital diagnostics, all parties received grant monies for the work done; associate member of the Faculty for Clinical Informatics and a health executive in residence for the UCL Global Business School for Health (unpaid, volunteer role); stock or stock options in Kheiron Medical Technologies (employee share options benefit scheme). M.B. iCAIRD funded by Innovate UK, under the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund “From Data to Early Diagnosis in Precision Medicine” challenge. D.J.H. Receipt of research award (chief investigator) from Innovate UK/UKRI, this funding underpinned the research infrastructure and some staff time. L.A.A. Funding from Innovate UK. G.L. No relevant relationships.
Références
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e351-e358
pubmed: 35396184
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;40(16):1732-1740
pubmed: 34767469
BMJ. 2021 Sep 1;374:n1872
pubmed: 34470740
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):342-8
pubmed: 22771529
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 9;24(3):e31684
pubmed: 35262495
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e384-e397
pubmed: 35396183
Radiol Artif Intell. 2022 May 04;4(3):e210064
pubmed: 35652114