Is plant biomass input driving soil organic matter formation processes in grassland soil under contrasting management?

Livestock grazing Management intensity Microbial functioning Mowing

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 17 02 2023
revised: 25 05 2023
accepted: 28 05 2023
medline: 5 7 2023
pubmed: 10 6 2023
entrez: 9 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Grassland management practices vary in stocking rates and plant removal strategies (grazing versus mowing). They influence organic matter (OM) inputs, which were postulated as main controls of soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and might therefore control SOC stabilization. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by investigating the impacts of grassland harvesting regimes on parameters related to soil microbial functioning and soil organic matter (SOM) formation processes. We used a thirteen-year experiment in Central France under contrasting management (unmanaged, grazing with two intensities, mowing, bare fallow) to establish a carbon input gradient based on biomass leftovers after harvest. We investigated microbial biomass, basal respiration and enzyme activities as indicators of microbial functioning, and amino sugar content and composition as indicator of persistent SOM formation and origin through necromass accumulation. Responses of these parameters to carbon input along the gradient were contrasting and in most cases unrelated. Only the microbial C/N ratio and amino sugar contents showed a linear response indicating that they are influenced by plant-derived OM input. Other parameters were most probably more influenced by root activity, presence of herbivores, and/or physicochemical changes following management activities impacting soil microbial functioning. Grassland harvesting strategies influence SOC sequestration not only by changing carbon input quantity, but also through their effects on belowground processes possibly related to changing carbon input types and physiochemical soil properties.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37295529
pii: S0048-9697(23)03171-6
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164550
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0
Carbon 7440-44-0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

164550

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest We state that there is no conflict of interests.

Auteurs

Aliia Gilmullina (A)

P3F, INRAE, Lusignan, France; ECOSYS, INRAE, Palaiseau, France.

Cornelia Rumpel (C)

CNRS, SorbonneU, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences (iEES), UMR SorbonneU, CNRS, UPEC, IRD, INRA, Paris, France. Electronic address: cornelia.rumpel@inrae.fr.

Evgenia Blagodatskaya (E)

Department of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Halle, Germany.

Katja Klumpp (K)

UMR INRAE, VetAgroSup, University of Clermont Auvergne, UMR Ecosystem Prairiale, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Isabelle Bertrand (I)

UMR Eco&Sols, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, IRD, InstitutAgro Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Michaela A Dippold (MA)

Geo-Biosphere Interactions, Department of Geosciences, University of Tuebingen, Germany.

Abad Chabbi (A)

P3F, INRAE, Lusignan, France; ECOSYS, INRAE, Palaiseau, France. Electronic address: abad.chabbi@inrae.fr.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Animals Cattle Alberta Deer Seasons

Classifications MeSH