Equal mixture of 2% lidocaine with adrenaline and 0.5% bupivacaine 20 mL provided faster onset of complete conduction blockade during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block than 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine alone: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial.

Brachial Plexus Lower Extremity REGIONAL ANESTHESIA Upper Extremity analgesia

Journal

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
ISSN: 1532-8651
Titre abrégé: Reg Anesth Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9804508

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 27 03 2023
accepted: 25 05 2023
pubmed: 10 6 2023
medline: 10 6 2023
entrez: 9 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Recent evidence has questioned the advantage of local anesthetic (LA) combinations. This study tested the hypothesis that mixing rapid-onset (lidocaine) and long-duration (bupivacaine) LA would provide faster onset of complete conduction blockade (CCB) compared with bupivacaine alone and longer duration of analgesia compared with lidocaine alone during low-volume (20 mL) ultrasound-guided (USG) supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB). Sixty-three patients receiving USG-SCBPB were randomly allocated into: group The mean time to CCB of group LB (16±7 min) was comparable (p>0.05) with group L (14±6 min) and group B (21±8 min) in patients who were attained CCB. However, the proportion of patients attaining complete conduction block (TCS=16/16) was significantly lower (p=0.0001) in group B (48%) when compared with group L (95%) and group LB (95%) at the end of 40 min. The median (IQR) duration of postoperative analgesia was longest in group B; 12.2 (12-14.5) hours, followed by group LB 8.3 (7-11) hours and 4 (2.7-4.5) hours in group L. At 20 mL LA volume, equal mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine provided significantly faster onset of CCB compared with bupivacaine alone and longer duration of postoperative analgesia compared with lidocaine alone but shorter than bupivacaine alone during low-volume USG-SCBPB. CTRI/2020/11/029359.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37295795
pii: rapm-2023-104542
doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104542
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Sripriya R (S)

Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India.

Sivashanmugam T (S)

Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India drsiva95@gmail.com.

Daniel Rajadurai (D)

Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India.

S Parthasarathy (S)

Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, India.

Classifications MeSH