Fetal atomic bomb survivor dosimetry using the J45 series of pregnant female phantoms with realistic survivor exposure scenarios: comparisons to dose estimates in the DS02 system.
Atomic bomb
In-utero cohort
Pregnant female phantom
RERF
Radiation dosimetry
Journal
Radiation and environmental biophysics
ISSN: 1432-2099
Titre abrégé: Radiat Environ Biophys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0415677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
received:
15
07
2022
accepted:
27
05
2023
medline:
21
7
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
9
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A significant source of information on radiation-induced biological effects following in-utero irradiation stems from studies of atomic bomb survivors who were pregnant at the time of exposure in Hiroshima, and to a lesser extent, from survivors in Nagasaki. Dose estimates to the developing fetus for these survivors have been assigned in prior dosimetry systems of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation as the dose to the uterine wall within the non-pregnant adult stylized phantom, originally designed for the dosimetry system DS86 and then carried forward in DS02. In a prior study, a new J45 (Japanese 1945) series of high-resolution phantoms of the adult pregnant female at 8 weeks, 15 weeks, 25 weeks, and 38-weeks post-conception was presented. Fetal and maternal organ doses were estimated by computationally exposing the pregnant female phantom series to DS02 free-in-air cumulative photon and neutron fluences at three distances from the hypocenter at both Hiroshima and Nagasaki under idealized frontal (AP) and isotropic (ISO) particle incidence. In this present study, this work was extended using realistic angular fluences (480 directions) from the DS02 system for seven radiation source terms, nine different radiation dose components, and five shielding conditions. In addition, to explore the effects of fetal position within the womb, four new phantoms were created and the same irradiation scenarios were performed. General findings are that the current DS02 fetal dose surrogate overestimates values of fetal organ dose seen in the J45 phantoms towards the cranial end of the fetus, especially in the later stages of pregnancy. For example, for in-open exposures at 1000 m in Hiroshima, the ratio of J45 fetal brain dose to DS02 uterine wall dose is 0.90, 0.82, and 0.70 at 15 weeks, 25 weeks, and 38-weeks, respectively, for total gamma exposures, and are 0.64, 0.44, and 0.37 at these same gestational ages for total neutron exposures. For organs in the abdominal and pelvic regions of the fetus, dose gradients across gestational age flatten and later reverse, so that DS02 fetal dosimetry begins to underestimate values of fetal organ dose as seen in the J45 phantoms. For example, for the same exposure scenario, the ratios of J45 fetal kidney dose to DS02 uterine wall dose are about 1.09 from 15 to 38 weeks for total gamma dose, and are 1.30, 1.56, and 1.75 at 15 weeks, 25 weeks, and 38 weeks, respectively, for the total neutron dose. Results using the new fetal positioning phantoms show this trend reversing for a head-up, breach fetal position. This work supports previous findings that the J45 pregnant female phantom series offers significant opportunities for gestational age-dependent assessment of fetal organ dose without the need to invoke the uterine wall as a fetal organ surrogate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37296237
doi: 10.1007/s00411-023-01032-5
pii: 10.1007/s00411-023-01032-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
317-329Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Bahadori AA, Johnson P, Jokisch DW, Eckerman KF, Bolch WE (2011) Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from neutron irradiation. Phys Med Biol 56(21):6873–6897
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/21/008
BEIR (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—phase 2. National Research Council, Washington, DC
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, Spong CY (2018) Williams obstetrics, 25th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Griffin K, Paulbeck C, Bolch WE, Cullings HM, Egbert SD, Funamoto S, Sato T, Endo A, Hertel N, Lee C (2019) Dosimetric impact of a new computational voxel phantom series for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors: children and adults. Radiat Res 191:369–379
doi: 10.1667/RR15267.1
Griffin KT, Sato T, Funamoto S, Chizhov K, Domal S, Paulbeck C, Bolch W, Cullings HM, Egbert S, Endo A, Hertel N, Lee C (2022) Japanese pediatric and adult atomic bomb survivor dosimetry: potential improvements using the J45 phantom series and modern Monte Carlo transport. Radiat Environ Biophys 61:73–86
doi: 10.1007/s00411-021-00946-2
Hirayama H, Namito Y, Bielajew AF, Wilderman SJ, Nelson WR (2005) Technical report SLAC-R-730 and KEK report 2005–8: the EGS5 code system. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA
ICRP (2007) ICRP publication 103: recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332
Johnson PB, Bahadori AA, Eckerman KF, Lee C, Bolch WE (2011) Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation - an update. Phys Med Biol 56(8):2347–2365
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/8/002
Kerr GD (2012) DS86 and DS02 organ dose calculations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 149(1):15–20
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr255
Maynard MR, Geyer JW, Aris JP, Shifrin RY, Bolch W (2011) The UF family of hybrid phantoms of the developing human fetus for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 56(15):4839–4879
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/014
Maynard MR, Long NS, Moawad NS, Shifrin RY, Geyer AM, Fong G, Bolch WE (2014) The UF Family of hybrid phantoms of the pregnant female for computational radiation dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 59(15):4325–4343
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4325
Otake M, Schull WJ (1993) Radiation-related small head sizes among prenatally exposed A-bomb survivors. Int J Radiat Biol 63(2):255–270
doi: 10.1080/09553009314550341
Paulbeck C, Griffin K, Lee C, Cullings HM, Egbert SD, Funamoto S, Sato T, Endo A, Hertel N, Bolch WE (2019) Dosimetric impact of a new computational voxel phantom series for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors: pregnant females. Radiat Res 192:538–561
doi: 10.1667/RR15394.1
Preston DL, Cullings H, Suyama A, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K, Kasagi F, Shore RE (2008) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors exposed in utero or as young children. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(6):428–436
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn045
RERF (2005) Reassessment of the atomic bomb radiation dosimetry for hiroshima and nagasaki—dosimetry system 2002. Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
RERF (1987) US-Japan Joint Assessment of Atomic Bomb Radiation Dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki - Final Report. Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa H, Furuta T, Abe S, Kai T, Tasi P, Matsuda N, Iwase H, Shigyo N, Sihver L, Nitta K (2018) Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. J Nucl Sci Tech 55(6):684–690
doi: 10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
Sato T, Funamoto S, Paulbeck C, Griffin K, Lee C, Cullings H, Egbert SD, Endo A, Hertel N, Bolch WE (2020) Dosimetric impact of a new computational voxel phantom series for the japanese atomic bomb survivors: methodological improvements and organ dose response functions. Radiat Res 194(4):390–402
doi: 10.1667/RR15546.1
Shibata K, Iwamoto O, Nakagawa T, Iwamoto N, Ichihara A, Kunieda S (2011) JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J Nucl Sci Tech 48:1–30
doi: 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675