Health Utilities of Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss with Assistive Devices.
cochlear implants
health utility
hearing impairment
Journal
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2023
05 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
01
02
2023
revised:
29
05
2023
accepted:
31
05
2023
medline:
10
6
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder in newborns. Early intervention with assistive devices benefits children's auditory and speech performance. This study aimed to measure the health utilities of children with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing impairment with different assistive devices. The descriptions of four hypothetical health states were developed, and their utility values were obtained from healthcare professionals via the visual analogue scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Thirty-seven healthcare professionals completed the TTO interview and were included in the analysis. The mean utility scores obtained via VAS were 0.31 for no assistive devices, 0.41 for bilateral hearing aids, 0.63 for bimodal hearing, and 0.82 for bilateral cochlear implants. As for the utility scores obtained via TTO, mean values were 0.60, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively. None of the four groups had the same VAS- or TTO-elicited utility (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37297789
pii: healthcare11111649
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111649
pmc: PMC10252331
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Cathay General Hospital-National Taiwan University Hospital Joint Research Program
ID : 110-CGN11
Organisme : National Taiwan University Hospital grant
ID : NTUH 112-A157
Références
JAMA. 1996 Aug 14;276(6):453-9
pubmed: 8691552
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(9):1-224
pubmed: 24524660
Children (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;8(9):
pubmed: 34572196
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):68-80
pubmed: 25385749
Br Med Bull. 2010;96:5-21
pubmed: 21037243
Laryngoscope. 2011 Jun;121(6):1287-93
pubmed: 21557232
Ear Hear. 2010 Oct;31(5):611-24
pubmed: 20473177
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8
pubmed: 17823546
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(4-5):236-258
pubmed: 29262414
J Health Econ. 1997 Apr;16(2):155-75
pubmed: 10169092
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 05;11(1):
pubmed: 35012010
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Feb;37(1):6-17
pubmed: 19897328
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1137-54
pubmed: 26040242
JAMA. 2020 Dec 01;324(21):2195-2205
pubmed: 33258894
Int J Audiol. 2020 Jan;59(1):39-44
pubmed: 31498005
J Laryngol Otol. 2020 May;134(5):387-397
pubmed: 32468973
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1993 Nov-Dec;55(6):341-6
pubmed: 8265119
Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125(2):442-7
pubmed: 25169819
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Jul;14 Suppl 1:S53-64
pubmed: 23900665
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Oct;34(10):993-1004
pubmed: 27084198
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jan;37(1):38-45
pubmed: 26649604
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):1023-8
pubmed: 25811350
JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1498-506
pubmed: 20407059
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Dec;39(10):1256-1263
pubmed: 30444842
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Nov;128(11):1255-62
pubmed: 12431166
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Feb;95(2):107-12
pubmed: 19948510
Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):685-93
pubmed: 20448248
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;53(1):87-102
pubmed: 31677740
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):141-52
pubmed: 18664684