Nonintubated versus Intubated Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Patients with End-Stage Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia.
LVRS
VV ECLS
hypercapnia
lung emphysema
nonintubated
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2023
29 May 2023
Historique:
received:
04
04
2023
revised:
08
05
2023
accepted:
25
05
2023
medline:
10
6
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents an important treatment option in carefully selected patients with end-stage lung emphysema. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nonintubated LVRS compared to intubated LVRS in patients with preoperative hypercapnia and lung emphysema. Between April 2019 and February 2021, n = 92 patients with end-stage lung emphysema and preoperative hypercapnia undergoing unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic LVRS (VATS-LVRS) performed in epidural anesthesia and mild sedation (nonintubated, group 1) or conventional general anesthesia (intubated, control, group 2) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Data were retrospectively analyzed. In all patients, low-flow veno-venous extracorporeal lung support (low-flow VV ECLS) was applied as a bridge through LVRS. Ninety-day mortality was considered as the primary outcome. Secondary endpoints included: chest tube duration, hospital stay, intubation and conversion to general anesthesia. Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference between the baseline data and patients' demographics. N = 36 patients underwent nonintubated surgery. VATS-LVRS under general anesthesia was performed in n = 56 patients. The mean duration of postoperative VV ECLS support was 3 ± 1 day in group 1 compared to 4 ± 1 in group 2. The 90-day mortality rate was 3% in group 1 compared to 7% in group 2. In group 1, all chest tubes were removed 5 ± 1 day (range 4-32 days) and 8 ± 1 day (range 4-44 days) in the control group after the surgery (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37297944
pii: jcm12113750
doi: 10.3390/jcm12113750
pmc: PMC10253275
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
ASAIO J. 2020 Aug;66(8):952-959
pubmed: 32740358
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2128-35
pubmed: 18552698
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2746-2754
pubmed: 29548583
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):311-20
pubmed: 18831509
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1001-1006
pubmed: 29253106
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998 Aug;14(2):107-12
pubmed: 9754992
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr;111(4):1182-1189
pubmed: 32857994
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1761-8
pubmed: 15511470
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 May;35(5):822-8; discussion 828
pubmed: 19233672
N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2059-73
pubmed: 12759479
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999 Jun;13(3):322-9
pubmed: 10392687
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Apr;8(Suppl 4):S364-75
pubmed: 27195134
Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Nov;66(5):1726-31
pubmed: 9875779
Proc R Soc Med. 1936 Apr;29(6):643-53
pubmed: 19990681
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jan;6(1):10-3
pubmed: 24455170
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;67(3):216-221
pubmed: 28905341
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 3):S220-S222
pubmed: 30997181
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Feb;21(1):7-12
pubmed: 25546531
Surg Innov. 2015 Apr;22(2):123-30
pubmed: 24821259
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jun;120(6):1405-12
pubmed: 25526396
N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 11;345(15):1075-83
pubmed: 11596586
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):343-350
pubmed: 33831216
Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):51-9
pubmed: 15693984
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(8):3556-3568
pubmed: 31559062
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):721-31
pubmed: 25896196
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 12;14(11):e0224737
pubmed: 31714904
Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):550-8
pubmed: 9118686
J Thorac Dis. 2012 Aug;4(4):347-51
pubmed: 22934136