Evaluation of the Cognitive Function of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss Pre- and Post-Cochlear Implantation Using Verbal Fluency Testing.
cochlear implant
hearing loss
phonemic pathway
semantic pathway
verbal fluency
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2023
31 May 2023
Historique:
received:
10
05
2023
revised:
27
05
2023
accepted:
29
05
2023
medline:
10
6
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hearing loss is a major public health problem with significant evidence correlating it with cognitive performance. Verbal fluency tests are commonly used to assess lexical access. They provide a great deal of information about a subject's cognitive function. The aim of our study was to evaluate phonemic and semantic lexical access abilities in adults with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss and then to re-evaluate a cohort after cochlear implantation. 103 adult subjects underwent phonemic and semantic fluency tests during a cochlear implant candidacy evaluation. Of the total 103 subjects, 43 subjects underwent the same tests at 3 months post-implantation. Our results showed superior performance in phonemic fluency compared to semantic fluency in subjects prior to implantation. Phonemic fluency was positively correlated with semantic fluency. Similarly, individuals with congenital deafness had better semantic lexical access than individuals with acquired deafness. Results at 3 months post-implantation showed an improvement in phonemic fluency. No correlation was found between the evolution of pre- and post-implant fluency and the auditory gain of the cochlear implant, and we found no significant difference between congenital and acquired deafness. Our study shows an improvement in global cognitive function after cochlear implantation without differentiation of the phonemic-semantic pathway.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37297988
pii: jcm12113792
doi: 10.3390/jcm12113792
pmc: PMC10253652
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2362-2369
pubmed: 31486068
Neuroimage Clin. 2022;36:103149
pubmed: 35970113
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1553-1561
pubmed: 30091185
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 25;173(4):293-9
pubmed: 23337978
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;48(6):1097-116
pubmed: 26443490
Laryngoscope. 2022 Apr;132 Suppl 7:S1-S15
pubmed: 34738240
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(1):70-83
pubmed: 25658578
Ear Hear. 2020 Oct 09;42(3):606-614
pubmed: 33055579
Semin Hear. 2021 Dec 09;42(4):342-351
pubmed: 34912162
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 15;49(4):3443-51
pubmed: 19931402
Neuron. 2001 Jun;30(3):657-63
pubmed: 11430800
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 May 12;11:603-13
pubmed: 27274210
Neurol Sci. 2014 Mar;35(3):365-72
pubmed: 23963806
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):214-20
pubmed: 21320988
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Mar;41(3):e322-e329
pubmed: 31868779
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 23;12:744
pubmed: 30405333
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1212-22
pubmed: 15178173
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):115-126
pubmed: 29222544
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 May-Jun;52(3):250-2
pubmed: 20472312
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446
pubmed: 32738937
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;33(3):358-65
pubmed: 21058118
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 May 1;141(5):442-50
pubmed: 25763680
Neurology. 2012 Oct 9;79(15):1583-90
pubmed: 23019269
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217633
pubmed: 35713903
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Oct;63(10):2099-104
pubmed: 26480972
Acta Neurol Belg. 1990;90(4):207-17
pubmed: 2124031
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(4):236-245
pubmed: 33440376
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):1099-107
pubmed: 19632335
Codas. 2014 Nov-Dec;26(6):434-8
pubmed: 25590903
Brain. 2000 Jul;123 ( Pt 7):1391-402
pubmed: 10869051
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Oct;27(10):799-810
pubmed: 16511886