Effect of Different Extraction Methods on the Total Phenolics of Sugar Cane Products.
antioxidant
ethanol extraction
less refined sugar
phenolic compounds
α-amylase
α-glucosidase
Journal
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 May 2023
28 May 2023
Historique:
received:
30
03
2023
revised:
19
05
2023
accepted:
24
05
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The health benefits of sugar cane products are attributed to certain antioxidant compounds in plant materials. The presence of antioxidants in plant materials depends on the extraction method in terms of yield and the number of phenolic compounds identified. This study was carried out to evaluate the performance of the three extraction methods, which were selected from previous studies to show the effect of the extraction method on the content of antioxidant compounds in different types of sugar. This study also evaluates the potential of different sugar extracts in anti-diabetic activity based on in vitro assays (α-glucosidase and α-amylase). The results showed that sugar cane extracted with acidified ethanol (1.6 M HCl in 60% ethanol) was the best condition to extract a high yield of phenolic acids compared to other methods. Among the three types of sugar, less refined sugar (LRS) showed the highest yield of phenolic compounds, 57.72 µg/g, compared to brown sugar (BS) and refined sugar (RS) sugar, which were at 42.19 µg/g and 22.06 µg/g, respectively. Whereas, among the sugar cane derivatives, LRS showed minor and BS moderate inhibition towards α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity compared to white sugar (RS). Thus, it is suggested that sugar cane extracted with acidified ethanol (1.6 M HCl in 60% ethanol) is the optimum experimental condition for antioxidant content determination and provides a basis for further exploitation of the health-beneficial resources of the sugarcane products.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37298880
pii: molecules28114403
doi: 10.3390/molecules28114403
pmc: PMC10254502
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antioxidants
0
alpha-Glucosidases
EC 3.2.1.20
Phenols
0
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
alpha-Amylases
EC 3.2.1.1
Sugars
0
Plant Extracts
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Universiti Putra Malaysia.
ID : 6300256-14001
Références
Mar Drugs. 2018 May 07;16(5):
pubmed: 29735927
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Sep 20;54(19):7270-6
pubmed: 16968093
Anal Chem. 2009 Jun 15;81(12):5023-32
pubmed: 19462963
Int J Biol Macromol. 2014 Mar;64:213-23
pubmed: 24333230
Pharmacogn Rev. 2015 Jan-Jun;9(17):45-54
pubmed: 26009693
Int Immunopharmacol. 2004 Aug;4(8):983-90
pubmed: 15222973
J Phys Chem B. 2007 Jan 25;111(3):496-501
pubmed: 17228904
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Jul 31;8(9):5048-5062
pubmed: 32994965
Food Chem. 2014 Mar 15;147:10-6
pubmed: 24206679
Molecules. 2022 Jan 04;27(1):
pubmed: 35011523
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 26;9(2):e13276
pubmed: 36816322
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 1;172:543-50
pubmed: 25442590
Chem Cent J. 2018 Apr 4;12(1):35
pubmed: 29619623
J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2009 Oct;24(5):1194-200
pubmed: 19772492
J Oleo Sci. 2007;56(11):611-4
pubmed: 17938552