Recently urodynamic and quality of life assessment in the non-menopausal women with cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Quality of life
Radical hysterectomy
Urodynamics analysis
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2023
10 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
17
01
2023
accepted:
18
05
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
10
6
2023
entrez:
10
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the pre- and postoperative changes in the recently urodynamic and quality of life (QoL) in nonmenopausal women diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated with radical hysterectomy (RH). Twenty-eight nonmenopausal women (28-49 years) with cervical carcinoma (FIGO stage Ia2-IIa) underwent a radical hysterectomy. Urodynamic studies were performed 1 week before (U0) and 3-6 months (U1) after surgery. A self-administered condition-specific QoL questionnaire (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7) was applied at U0 and U1. Data from the urodynamics analysis performed at U1 showed that the average first sensation volume (119.39 ± 12.28 ml vs 150.43 ± 31.45 ml, P < 0.001), the residual urine volume (6.39 ± 10.44 ml vs. 42.32 ± 33.72 ml, P < 0.001), and the time of urination (46.10 ± 16.65 s vs. 74.31 ± 23.94 s, P < 0.001) were increased, while the bladder volume at a strong desire to void (448.89 ± 86.62 ml vs. 322.82 ± 50.89 ml, P < 0.001), the bladder compliance (82.63 ± 58.06 ml/cmH Radical hysterectomy results in urodynamic changes, and 3-6 months postoperation may be an important period for changes in bladder dysfunction after RH. Urodynamic and QoL analyses may provide methods for assessing symptoms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37300713
doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07823-2
pii: 10.1007/s00520-023-07823-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
389Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Maneschi F (2014) Urodynamic study of bladder function following nerve sparing radical hysterectomy. J Gynecol Oncol 25(3):159–161. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.3.159
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.3.159
pubmed: 25045424
pmcid: 4102728
Zullo M, Manci N, Angioli R et al (2003) Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48(3):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1040-8428(03)00125-2
doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(03)00125-2
pubmed: 14693341
Pieterse QD, Kenter GG, Maas CP et al (2013) Self-reported sexual, bowel and bladder function in cervical cancer patients following different treatment modalities: longitudinal prospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(9):1717–1725. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a80a65
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a80a65
pubmed: 24172106
Rosier P, Schaefer W, Lose G et al (2017) International continence society good urodynamic practices and terms 2016: urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn 36:1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23124
doi: 10.1002/nau.23124
pubmed: 27917521
Marcus J (2018) Drake, Fundamentals of urodynamic practice, based on International Continence Society good urodynamic practices recommendations. Neurourol Urodyn 37:S50–S60. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23773
doi: 10.1002/nau.23773
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC (2005) Short forms of two condition specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(1):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025
pubmed: 16021067
Wit EMK, Horenblas S (2014) Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer. Nat Rev Urol 11(2):110–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.323
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.323
pubmed: 24473416
Laterza RM, Sievert KD, De Ridder D et al (2015) Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurourol Urodyn 34(4):309–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22570
doi: 10.1002/nau.22570
pubmed: 24519734
Chuang TY, Yu KJ, Penn IW et al (2015) Neurourological changes before and after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(10):954–959. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00177.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00177.x
Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Ybarra MAS et al (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J 17(6):642–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8
doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8
Kanao H, Andou M (2011) Various types of nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomies and their effects to bladder functions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(6):S24–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.091
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.091
Hiroyuki K, Kazuko F, Keiko E et al (2014) Various types of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomies and their effects on bladder function. J Gynecol Oncol 25(3):198–205. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2014.25.3.198
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.3.198
Axelsen SM, Gammelgaard L, Petersen LK (2007) Ultrasound and MRI before and after radical hysterectomy: does the operation affect the pelvic floor muscles. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 28(3):201–206
pubmed: 17624087
Jiang W, Liang M, Han D et al (2018) A modification of laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy to reduce postoperative bladder dysfunction: a retrospective study. J Invest Surg 32(3):272–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2017.1412542
doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1412542
pubmed: 29303389
Zhang Y, Shi T, Sheng Y et al (2017) An improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique for cervical cancer using the paravesico-vaginal space as a new surgical landmark. Oncotarget 8(52):90413–904203. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19011
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19011
pubmed: 29163840
pmcid: 5685761
Gent MDJMV, Rademaker M, Gaarenstroom KN et al (2017) Long-term oncological outcome after conventional radical hysterectomy versus 2 nerve-sparing modalities for early stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001067
doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001067
pubmed: 28704329
Chhabra S, Shelke S, Sonarkar S (2015) Bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy preventive modalities: limitations. Indian J Gynecol 13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-015-0008-2
doi: 10.1007/s40944-015-0008-2
Liao JY, Lin YH, Liang CC et al (2015) Monitoring bladder compliance using end filling detrusor pressure: clinical results and related factors. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 54(6):709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.003
pubmed: 26700990
Seung KH, Keewon K, Seung-Bum R et al (2015) Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 26(2):100–110. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.100
Plotti F, Angioli R, Zullo MA et al (2011) Update on urodynamic bladder dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 80(2):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.12.004
pubmed: 21277788
Laterza RM, Salvatore S et al (2015) urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 194:11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.08.005
pubmed: 26313524
Jiang Y, Tang YR, Xie C et al (2017) Influence of sleep disorders on somatic symptoms, mental health, and quality of life in patients with chronic constipation. Medicine(Baltimore) 96(7):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006093
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006093
Kathy D, Devinder K (2005) Posterior pelvic floor compartment disorder.Best Practice &. Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 19(6):941–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.010
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.010
Hazewinkel MH, Sprangers MA, Van der Velden J et al (2010) Long-term cervical cancer survivors suffer from pelvic floor symptoms: a cross-sectional matched cohort study. Gynecol Oncol 117(2):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.034
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.034
pubmed: 20170944
Selcuk S, Cam C, Asoglu MR et al (2016) Effect of simple and radical hysterectomy on quality of life – analysis of all aspects of pelvic floor dysfunction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 198:84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.008
pubmed: 26802255