Results of haploidentical transplant in patients with donor-specific antibodies: a survey on behalf of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy.
DSA kinetics
desensitization strategies
donor-specific antibodies
graft failure
haplo-HSCT
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
14
02
2023
accepted:
16
05
2023
medline:
13
6
2023
pubmed:
12
6
2023
entrez:
12
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are IgG allo-antibodies against mismatched donor HLA molecules and can cause graft failure (GF) in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Our aim was to report the experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GETH-TC) in DSA-positive patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT. We conducted a survey of patients who underwent haplo-HSCT in GETH-TC centers between 2012 and 2021. Data were collected on the DSA assay used, monitoring strategy, complement fixation, criteria for desensitization, desensitization strategies and transplant outcomes. Fifteen centers from the GETH-TC responded to the survey. During the study period, 1,454 patients underwent haplo-HSCT. Seventy of the transplants were performed in 69 DSA-positive patients, all of whom lacked a suitable alternative donor; 61 (88%) patients were female (90% with prior pregnancies). All patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Regarding baseline DSA intensity, 46 (67%) patients presented mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >5,000, including 21 (30%) with MFI >10,000 and three (4%) with MFI >20,000. Six patients did not receive desensitization treatment, four of them with MFI <5,000. Of 63 patients receiving desensitization treatment, 48 (76%) were tested after desensitization therapy, and a reduction in intensity was confirmed in 45 (71%). Three patients (5%) experienced an increase in MFI after desensitization, two of whom experienced primary GF. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 74% in a median of 18 days (IQR, 15─20); six patients died before engraftment due to toxicity or infection and eight patients had primary GF despite desensitization in seven of them. After a median follow-up of 30 months, two-year overall and event-free survival were 46.5% and 39%, respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 43%. Infection was the most frequent cause of NRM, followed by endothelial toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified baseline MFI >20,000 as an independent risk factor for survival and an increase in titers after infusion as an independent risk factor for GF. Haplo-HSCT is feasible in DSA-positive patients, with high rates of engraftment after desensitization guided by DSA intensity. Baseline MFI >20,000 and increased intensity after infusion are risk factors for survival and GF.
Sections du résumé
Background
Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are IgG allo-antibodies against mismatched donor HLA molecules and can cause graft failure (GF) in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Our aim was to report the experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GETH-TC) in DSA-positive patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT.
Methods
We conducted a survey of patients who underwent haplo-HSCT in GETH-TC centers between 2012 and 2021. Data were collected on the DSA assay used, monitoring strategy, complement fixation, criteria for desensitization, desensitization strategies and transplant outcomes.
Results
Fifteen centers from the GETH-TC responded to the survey. During the study period, 1,454 patients underwent haplo-HSCT. Seventy of the transplants were performed in 69 DSA-positive patients, all of whom lacked a suitable alternative donor; 61 (88%) patients were female (90% with prior pregnancies). All patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Regarding baseline DSA intensity, 46 (67%) patients presented mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >5,000, including 21 (30%) with MFI >10,000 and three (4%) with MFI >20,000. Six patients did not receive desensitization treatment, four of them with MFI <5,000. Of 63 patients receiving desensitization treatment, 48 (76%) were tested after desensitization therapy, and a reduction in intensity was confirmed in 45 (71%). Three patients (5%) experienced an increase in MFI after desensitization, two of whom experienced primary GF. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 74% in a median of 18 days (IQR, 15─20); six patients died before engraftment due to toxicity or infection and eight patients had primary GF despite desensitization in seven of them. After a median follow-up of 30 months, two-year overall and event-free survival were 46.5% and 39%, respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 43%. Infection was the most frequent cause of NRM, followed by endothelial toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified baseline MFI >20,000 as an independent risk factor for survival and an increase in titers after infusion as an independent risk factor for GF.
Conclusions
Haplo-HSCT is feasible in DSA-positive patients, with high rates of engraftment after desensitization guided by DSA intensity. Baseline MFI >20,000 and increased intensity after infusion are risk factors for survival and GF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37304258
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1165759
pmc: PMC10250708
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunoglobulin G
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1165759Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Bailén, Alenda, Herruzo-Delgado, Acosta-Fleitas, Vallés, Esquirol, Fonseca, Solán, Sánchez-Vadillo, Bautista, Bento, López-Godino, Pérez-Martínez, Torrent, Zanabili, Calbacho, Moreno, Pascual-Cascón, Guerra-Domínguez, Chinea, García-Cadenas, López-Corral, Boix-Giner, López Lorenzo, Humala, Duarte, Sampol, Heras, Vicario, Balas, Oarbeascoa, Fernández-Caldas, Anguita and Kwon.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):645-650
pubmed: 29222316
Blood Adv. 2019 Aug 13;3(15):2424-2435
pubmed: 31409584
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jul;51(7):906-12
pubmed: 27183098
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;32(29):3249-56
pubmed: 25154831
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Apr;47(4):508-15
pubmed: 21691261
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 May;53(5):521-534
pubmed: 29335625
Adv Hematol. 2016;2016:4025073
pubmed: 26904122
Front Immunol. 2016 Dec 09;7:570
pubmed: 28018342
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;50(6):751-8
pubmed: 25706884
Blood. 2011 Dec 15;118(25):6691-7
pubmed: 21940825
Blood. 2014 Jun 5;123(23):3664-71
pubmed: 24744269
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan;13(1):10-24
pubmed: 26305035
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Apr;19(4):647-52
pubmed: 23353119
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014 Feb;49(2):212-8
pubmed: 24212562
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan;22(1):4-10
pubmed: 26386318
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022 Aug;57(8):1217-1239
pubmed: 35589997
Transplantation. 2009 Oct 27;88(8):1019-24
pubmed: 19855248
Transplantation. 2002 Apr 27;73(8):1280-5
pubmed: 11981422
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jan;21(1):4-7
pubmed: 25278457
Blood. 2010 Oct 14;116(15):2839-46
pubmed: 20628152
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;25(7):1395-1406
pubmed: 30826463
Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 26;5(20):4031-4043
pubmed: 34474478
Blood. 2011 Nov 24;118(22):5957-64
pubmed: 21967975
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Mar;21(3):389-401.e1
pubmed: 25529383
Front Immunol. 2021 May 19;12:674658
pubmed: 34093576
Blood. 2010 Apr 1;115(13):2704-8
pubmed: 20089963
Blood Adv. 2017;1(4):288-292
pubmed: 29242852
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;21(8):1392-8
pubmed: 25985919
Expert Rev Hematol. 2020 Aug;13(8):835-850
pubmed: 32749913