Biochemical-molecular-genetic biomarkers in the tear film, aqueous humor, and blood of primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
biomarkers
genes
glaucoma neurodegeneration
miRNAs
molecules
primary open-angle glaucoma
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2023
accepted:
04
04
2023
medline:
12
6
2023
pubmed:
12
6
2023
entrez:
12
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Glaucoma is a chronic neurodegenerative disease, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. As a response to high intraocular pressure, the clinical and molecular glaucoma biomarkers indicate the biological state of the visual system. Classical and uncovering novel biomarkers of glaucoma development and progression, follow-up, and monitoring the response to treatment are key objectives to improve vision outcomes. While the glaucoma imaging field has successfully validated biomarkers of disease progression, there is still a considerable need for developing new biomarkers of early glaucoma, that is, at the preclinical and initial glaucoma stages. Outstanding clinical trials and animal-model study designs, innovative technology, and analytical approaches in bioinformatics are essential tools to successfully uncover novel glaucoma biomarkers with a high potential for translation into clinical practice. To better understand the clinical and biochemical-molecular-genetic glaucoma pathogenesis, we conducted an analytical, observational, and case-comparative/control study in 358 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and 226 comparative-control individuals (CG) to collect tears, aqueous humor, and blood samples to be processed for identifying POAG biomarkers by exploring several biological pathways, such as inflammation, neurotransmitter/neurotrophin alteration, oxidative stress, gene expression, miRNAs fingerprint and its biological targets, and vascular endothelial dysfunction, Statistics were done by using the IBM SPSS 25.0 program. Differences were considered statistically significant when Mean age of the POAG patients was 70.03 ± 9.23 years, and 70.62 ± 7.89 years in the CG. Malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), interleuquin (IL)-6, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and 5 hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), displayed significantly higher levels in the POAG patients vs. the CG ( We are incredibly enthusiastic gathering as much information as possible on POAG biomarkers to learn how the above information can be used to better steer the diagnosis and therapy of glaucoma to prevent blindness in the predictable future. In fact, we may suggest that the design and development of blended biomarkers is a more appropriate solution in ophthalmological practice for early diagnosis and to predict therapeutic response in the POAG patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37305138
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1157773
pmc: PMC10251746
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.bcc2fqzj1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1157773Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Pinazo-Durán, Zanón-Moreno, García–Villanueva, Martucci, Peris-Martínez, Vila-Arteaga, García-Medina, Andrés–Blasco, Gallego–Martínez, Nucci and García–Feijoo.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2011 Jun;300(6):R1288-95
pubmed: 21368267
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13352-6
pubmed: 15340151
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jun 17;55(6):
pubmed: 31212881
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Aug;39(8):823-9
pubmed: 24912005
Ophthalmologe. 2021 May;118(5):429-430
pubmed: 33961113
J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2020 May 3;41(3):257-271
pubmed: 32046582
Recenti Prog Med. 2006 Jan;97(1):37-45
pubmed: 16535929
JAMA. 2022 May 24;327(20):2030
pubmed: 35608579
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Apr 11;9:637-52
pubmed: 24748782
J Optom. 2018 Jan - Mar;11(1):3-9
pubmed: 28760643
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;27(2):94-101
pubmed: 26720776
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 19;7(1):915
pubmed: 28424493
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 21;9(9):
pubmed: 32967086
J Proteomics. 2014 Feb 26;98:65-78
pubmed: 24355480
RNA. 2013 May;19(5):712-22
pubmed: 23525801
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 Jul;83:100916
pubmed: 33075485
Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2630:1-11
pubmed: 36689172
Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Feb;12(1):17-22
pubmed: 24620766
Maturitas. 2022 Sep;163:15-22
pubmed: 35597227
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 15;119(7):
pubmed: 35135877
J Glaucoma. 2022 Oct 1;31(10):783-788
pubmed: 35980843
J Glaucoma. 2008 Jun-Jul;17(4):263-8
pubmed: 18552610
Mol Vis. 2009 Dec 31;15:2953-9
pubmed: 20057902
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(7):903-918
pubmed: 28677495
Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:385-407
pubmed: 18929123
Mol Vis. 2013;19:231-42
pubmed: 23401652
Cell Signal. 2019 Feb;54:179-190
pubmed: 30439502
J Nippon Med Sch. 2021;88(2):128-132
pubmed: 33980757
Prog Brain Res. 2015;220:127-53
pubmed: 26497788
Eye (Lond). 2018 Mar;32(3):491-505
pubmed: 29171506
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 26;10(19):
pubmed: 34640431
Prog Brain Res. 2020;256(1):99-124
pubmed: 32958217
Prog Brain Res. 2015;220:1-35
pubmed: 26497783
Ophthalmic Res. 2011;46(2):98-102
pubmed: 21282966
Mol Vis. 2013 Aug 07;19:1841-6
pubmed: 23946639
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Feb 1;122(2):354-360
pubmed: 27909229
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(7):1018-1035
pubmed: 29676228
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 15;9:1020993
pubmed: 36590976
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;93(2):e7-e9
pubmed: 29289427
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 25;11(19):
pubmed: 36233515
J Clin Med. 2021 May 21;10(11):
pubmed: 34063878
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;13(1):98-107
pubmed: 23142105
Gene. 2016 Feb 15;577(2):119-31
pubmed: 26621382
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Oct;1820(10):1496-501
pubmed: 22664303
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(2):297-309
pubmed: 32674101
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003 Mar 17;111(1-2):189-97
pubmed: 12654519
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6215745
pubmed: 27051666
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;19(2):102-6
pubmed: 18301282
Exp Mol Pathol. 2011 Apr;90(2):231-7
pubmed: 21241689
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;29(2):141-146
pubmed: 29256895
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021 Sep 30;709:108941
pubmed: 34097903
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30
pubmed: 12049575
Brain Res Bull. 2015 Aug;117:1-9
pubmed: 26073842
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;29(4):437-443
pubmed: 30175615
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019 Sep;72:100767
pubmed: 31242454
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Feb;48(2):705-14
pubmed: 17251469
Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:359-74
pubmed: 26518087
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012 Mar;31(2):152-81
pubmed: 22155051
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 13;8:733080
pubmed: 34589504
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 29;111(30):11181-6
pubmed: 25024200
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Apr;17(4):797-799
pubmed: 34472476
Exp Eye Res. 2015 Feb;131:84-92
pubmed: 25479046
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012 Nov;31(6):527-50
pubmed: 22732126
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul;95(7):315-321
pubmed: 32414512
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11
pubmed: 24825645
Pediatr Nephrol. 2022 Mar;37(3):537-545
pubmed: 34085102
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 May 2;63(5):2
pubmed: 35503230
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 27;11(1):6033
pubmed: 33247115
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2009 Jan;44(1):46-51
pubmed: 19177187
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Aug;164:106352
pubmed: 32446164
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):701-13; discussion 829-30
pubmed: 12049574
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2401976
pubmed: 26904271
Clin Chim Acta. 2019 Aug;495:529-537
pubmed: 31153869
Ophthalmology. 2023 May;130(5):462-468
pubmed: 36693593
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 22;10(15):
pubmed: 34362014
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Feb;44(2):111-117
pubmed: 30309248
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Mar;120:28-35
pubmed: 24374036