A retrospective multicentric cohort study of checkpoint inhibitors-induced pruritus with focus on management.

immune checkpoint inhibitors immunotherapy narrow-band UVB (NBUVB) phototherapy pruritus

Journal

Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine
ISSN: 1600-0781
Titre abrégé: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9013641

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
revised: 04 05 2023
received: 02 02 2023
accepted: 19 05 2023
medline: 18 9 2023
pubmed: 12 6 2023
entrez: 12 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Limited data on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced pruritus per se and efficacy of different therapeutic modalities in its management exist. To study the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ICI-induced pruritus per se and to assess the efficacy of the therapeutic modalities usually applied. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 91 patients who were under treatment with ICIs for any kind of neoplasia and developed pruritus during treatment. Twenty out of 91 individuals (22.0%) with ICI-induced pruritus had pruritus as the only symptom, while 71/91 (78.0%) presented with pruritus coexisting with an additional cutaneous toxicity. Pruritus was treated with antihistamines (18/20, 90.0%) and/or topical regimens, as first-line choice. In resistant cases, as a second therapeutic intervention, narrow-band UVB (NBUVB), oral steroids and GABA analogs were added (70.0%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in mean pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores between baseline and sequential visits. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in mean NRS scores in those treated with phototherapy. Retrospective design, low number of patients and survivorship bias. Pruritus per se was present in a substantial portion of our cohort (22.0%). Our study confirms the efficacy of current treatment strategies and suggests NBUVB as a potential steroid-sparing therapeutic alternative.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Limited data on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced pruritus per se and efficacy of different therapeutic modalities in its management exist.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To study the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of ICI-induced pruritus per se and to assess the efficacy of the therapeutic modalities usually applied.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the records of 91 patients who were under treatment with ICIs for any kind of neoplasia and developed pruritus during treatment.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty out of 91 individuals (22.0%) with ICI-induced pruritus had pruritus as the only symptom, while 71/91 (78.0%) presented with pruritus coexisting with an additional cutaneous toxicity. Pruritus was treated with antihistamines (18/20, 90.0%) and/or topical regimens, as first-line choice. In resistant cases, as a second therapeutic intervention, narrow-band UVB (NBUVB), oral steroids and GABA analogs were added (70.0%). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in mean pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores between baseline and sequential visits. Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in mean NRS scores in those treated with phototherapy.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Retrospective design, low number of patients and survivorship bias.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Pruritus per se was present in a substantial portion of our cohort (22.0%). Our study confirms the efficacy of current treatment strategies and suggests NBUVB as a potential steroid-sparing therapeutic alternative.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37306213
doi: 10.1111/phpp.12892
doi:

Types de publication

Multicenter Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

506-511

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Sibaud V. Dermatologic reactions to immune checkpoint inhibitors: skin toxicities and immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):345-361.
Apalla Z, Papageorgiou C, Lallas A, et al. Cutaneous adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a literature review. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(1):e2021155.
National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf. Accessed November 27, 2017.
Reich A, Chatzigeorkidis E, Zeidler C, et al. Tailoring the cut-off values of the visual analogue scale and numeric rating scale in itch assessment. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(6):759-760.
Reich A, Riepe C, Anastasiadou Z, et al. Itch assessment with visual analogue scale and numerical rating scale: determination of minimal clinically important difference in chronic itch. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96(7):978-980.
Storck M, Sandmann S, Bruland P, et al. Pruritus Intensity Scales across Europe: a prospective validation study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(5):1176-1185.
Phillips GS, Wu J, Hellmann MD, et al. Treatment outcomes of immune-related cutaneous adverse events. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(30):2746-2758.
Sibaud V, Meyer N, Lamant L, Vigarios E, Mazieres J, Delord JP. Dermatologic complications of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Curr Opin Oncol. 2016;28(4):254-263.
Phillips GS, Freites-Martinez A, Wu J, et al. Clinical characterization of immunotherapy-related pruritus among patients seen in 2 oncodermatology clinics. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(2):249-251.
Ishihara H, Takagi T, Kondo T, et al. Association between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. Urol Oncol. 2019;37(6):355.e21-355.e29.
Aso M, Toi Y, Sugisaka J, et al. Association between skin reaction and clinical benefit in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2020;25(3):e536-e544.
Baldini E, Lunghi A, Cortesi E, et al. Immune-related adverse events correlate with clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab: the Italian NSCLC expanded access program. Lung Cancer. 2020;140:59-64.
Dupont R, Bérard E, Puisset F, et al. The prognostic impact of immune-related adverse events during anti-PD1 treatment in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-life retrospective study. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;9(1):1682383.
Cortellini A, Chiari R, Ricciuti B, et al. Correlations between the immune-related adverse events Spectrum and efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20(4):237-247.e1.
Haratani K, Hayashi H, Chiba Y, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with nivolumab efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):374-378.
Teraoka S, Fujimoto D, Morimoto T, et al. Early immune-related adverse events and association with outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab: a prospective cohort study. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(12):1798-1805.
Thompson JA, Schneider BJ, Brahmer J, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: management of immunotherapy-related toxicities, version 1.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(3):230-241.
Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5(1):95.
Santini FC, Rizvi H, Plodkowski AJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of Re-treating with immunotherapy after immune-related adverse events in patients with NSCLC. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018;6(9):1093-1099.
Faje AT, Lawrence D, Flaherty K, et al. High-dose glucocorticoids for the treatment of ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis is associated with reduced survival in patients with melanoma. Cancer. 2018;124(18):3706-3714.
Arbour KC, Mezquita L, Long N, et al. Impact of baseline steroids on efficacy of programmed cell Death-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(28):2872-2878.
Barrios DM, Phillips GS, Geisler AN, et al. IgE blockade with omalizumab reduces pruritus related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-HER2 therapies. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(6):736-745.
Ito J, Fujimoto D, Nakamura A, et al. Aprepitant for refractory nivolumab-induced pruritus. Lung Cancer. 2017;109:58-61.
Foroutan N, Etminan A, Nikvarz N, Shojai Shahrokh Abadi M. Comparison of pregabalin with doxepin in the management of uremic pruritus: a randomized single blind clinical trial. Hemodial Int. 2017;21(1):63-71.
Esfahani K, Henderson Berg MH, Zargham H, et al. Narrowband ultraviolet B therapy for refractory immune-related lichenoid dermatitis on PD-1 therapy: a case report. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(3):e001831.
Donaldson M, Owen JL, Chae YK, Choi JN. Management of persistent pruritus and lichenoid reaction secondary to nivolumab with narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy. Front Oncol. 2018;8:405.
Goldinger SM, Stieger P, Meier B, et al. Cytotoxic cutaneous adverse drug reactions during anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(16):4023-4029.
Allegra A, Di Salvo E, Casciaro M, et al. The impact of immunological checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy on chronic pruritus in cancer patients. Biomedicine. 2020;9(1):2.
Sigmundsdottir H, Johnston A, Gudjonsson JE, Valdimarsson H. Narrowband-UVB irradiation decreases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by stimulated T cells. Arch Dermatol Res. 2005;297(1):39-42.
Reich A, Mędrek K. Effects of narrow band UVB (311 nm) irradiation on epidermal cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(4):8456-8466.
Totonchy MB, Chiu MW. UV-based therapy. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32(3):399-413.
Bae JM, Ju HJ, Lee RW, et al. Evaluation for skin cancer and precancer in patients with vitiligo treated with Long-term narrowband UV-B phototherapy. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(5):529-537.
Hearn RM, Kerr AC, Rahim KF, Ferguson J, Dawe RS. Incidence of skin cancers in 3867 patients treated with narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(4):931-935.

Auteurs

Chryssoula Papageorgiou (C)

Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Elizabeth Lazaridou (E)

Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Konstantinos Lallas (K)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Kyparissos Papaioannou (K)

School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Vasiliki Nikolaou (V)

Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "A. Sygros" Hospital for Skin and Venereal Diseases, Athens, Greece.

Valeria Mateeva (V)

Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Konstantinos Efthymiadis (K)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Chrysanthi Koukoutzeli (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Konstantia Loga (K)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Eleni Sogka (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Evangelos Karamitrousis (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

George Lazaridis (G)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Dimitrios Dionysopoulos (D)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Aimilios Lallas (A)

First Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Christina Kemanetzi (C)

Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Christina Fotiadou (C)

Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Eleni Timotheadou (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Zoe Apalla (Z)

Second Dermatology Department, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH