Plastic surgery online, how accessible are our units?


Journal

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
ISSN: 1479-666X
Titre abrégé: Surgeon
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101168329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 25 01 2023
accepted: 09 05 2023
medline: 4 12 2023
pubmed: 13 6 2023
entrez: 12 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of remote patient and professional communication. This has been especially important for highly specialised and regionally-based specialties such as plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to review how UK plastic surgery units represent themselves online and their phone accessibility. UK plastic surgery units were identified using the BAPRAS website and their websites and telephone accessibility assessed. Whilst a minority of units have clearly invested heavily in ensuring comprehensive webpages, nearly a third have no dedicated webpage at all. We found significant variation in quality and user-friendliness of online resources both for patients and for other healthcare professionals, with less than a quarter of units providing comprehensive contact details, emergency referral guidance, or information about changes to services due to Covid-19, to highlight a few areas. Communication with the BAPRAS website was also poor with less than half of web-links connecting to correct and relevant webpage and only 13.5% of phone numbers connecting directly to a useful plastic surgery number. In the phone component of our study we found that 47% of calls to 'direct' numbers went to voicemail but wait-times were significantly less than going through hospital switchboards and connections were more accurate. In a world where a business' credibility is so heavily based on their online appearance and, in an increasingly online era of medicine, we hope that this study may be a resource for units to improve their web-based resources and prompt further research in enhancing patient experience online.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of remote patient and professional communication. This has been especially important for highly specialised and regionally-based specialties such as plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to review how UK plastic surgery units represent themselves online and their phone accessibility.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
UK plastic surgery units were identified using the BAPRAS website and their websites and telephone accessibility assessed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Whilst a minority of units have clearly invested heavily in ensuring comprehensive webpages, nearly a third have no dedicated webpage at all. We found significant variation in quality and user-friendliness of online resources both for patients and for other healthcare professionals, with less than a quarter of units providing comprehensive contact details, emergency referral guidance, or information about changes to services due to Covid-19, to highlight a few areas. Communication with the BAPRAS website was also poor with less than half of web-links connecting to correct and relevant webpage and only 13.5% of phone numbers connecting directly to a useful plastic surgery number. In the phone component of our study we found that 47% of calls to 'direct' numbers went to voicemail but wait-times were significantly less than going through hospital switchboards and connections were more accurate.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In a world where a business' credibility is so heavily based on their online appearance and, in an increasingly online era of medicine, we hope that this study may be a resource for units to improve their web-based resources and prompt further research in enhancing patient experience online.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37308375
pii: S1479-666X(23)00057-4
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.05.003
pmc: PMC10257443
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e372-e377

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they all have worked at a number of the assessed units but this has not affected how websites have been analysed and there are no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Cameron Clarke (C)

Plastic Surgery Registrar, Salisbury District Hospital, SP2 8BJ, UK. Electronic address: cameron.clarke@nhs.net.

Simon Filson (S)

Plastic Surgery Consultant, Guys' and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7EH, UK. Electronic address: simon.filson@gstt.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH