Delivery of Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screenings During the Pandemic in Community Health Centers: Practice Changes and Recovery Strategies.


Journal

Medical care
ISSN: 1537-1948
Titre abrégé: Med Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0230027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 08 2023
Historique:
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 13 6 2023
entrez: 13 6 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to clinical practice changes, which affected cancer preventive care delivery. To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the delivery of colorectal cancer (CRC) and cervical cancer (CVC) screenings. Parallel mixed methods design using electronic health record data (extracted between January 2019 and July 2021). Study results focused on 3 pandemic-related periods: March-May 2020, June-October 2020, and November 2020-September 2021. Two hundred seventeen community health centers located in 13 states and 29 semistructured interviews from 13 community health centers. Monthly up-to-date CRC and CVC screening rates and monthly rates of completed colonoscopies, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)/fecal occult blood test (FOBT) procedures, Papanicolaou tests among age and sex-eligible patients. Analysis used generalized estimating equations Poisson modeling. Qualitative analysts developed case summaries and created a cross-case data display for comparison. The results showed a reduction of 75% for colonoscopy [rate ratio (RR) = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.224-0.279], 78% for FIT/FOBT (RR = 0.218, 95% CI: 0.208-0.230), and 87% for Papanicolaou (RR = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.125-0.136) rates after the start of the pandemic. During this early pandemic period, CRC screening was impacted by hospitals halting services. Clinic staff moved toward FIT/FOBT screenings. CVC screening was impacted by guidelines encouraging pausing CVC screening, patient reluctance, and concerns about exposure. During the recovery period, leadership-driven preventive care prioritization and quality improvement capacity influenced CRC and CVC screening maintenance and recovery. Efforts supporting quality improvement capacity could be key actionable elements for these health centers to endure major disruptions to their care delivery system and to drive rapid recovery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to clinical practice changes, which affected cancer preventive care delivery.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the delivery of colorectal cancer (CRC) and cervical cancer (CVC) screenings.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Parallel mixed methods design using electronic health record data (extracted between January 2019 and July 2021). Study results focused on 3 pandemic-related periods: March-May 2020, June-October 2020, and November 2020-September 2021.
SUBJECTS
Two hundred seventeen community health centers located in 13 states and 29 semistructured interviews from 13 community health centers.
MEASURES
Monthly up-to-date CRC and CVC screening rates and monthly rates of completed colonoscopies, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)/fecal occult blood test (FOBT) procedures, Papanicolaou tests among age and sex-eligible patients. Analysis used generalized estimating equations Poisson modeling. Qualitative analysts developed case summaries and created a cross-case data display for comparison.
RESULTS
The results showed a reduction of 75% for colonoscopy [rate ratio (RR) = 0.250, 95% CI: 0.224-0.279], 78% for FIT/FOBT (RR = 0.218, 95% CI: 0.208-0.230), and 87% for Papanicolaou (RR = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.125-0.136) rates after the start of the pandemic. During this early pandemic period, CRC screening was impacted by hospitals halting services. Clinic staff moved toward FIT/FOBT screenings. CVC screening was impacted by guidelines encouraging pausing CVC screening, patient reluctance, and concerns about exposure. During the recovery period, leadership-driven preventive care prioritization and quality improvement capacity influenced CRC and CVC screening maintenance and recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Efforts supporting quality improvement capacity could be key actionable elements for these health centers to endure major disruptions to their care delivery system and to drive rapid recovery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37310241
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001879
pii: 00005650-990000000-00134
pmc: PMC10319245
mid: NIHMS1901402
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

554-561

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA244289
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

US Department of Health & Human Services. Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth Remote Communications During the COVID-19 Nationwide Public Health Emergency. Accessed August 16, 2022. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/notification-enforcement-discretion-telehealth/index.html
Tsui J, Llanos AA, Doose M, et al. Determinants of abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up and invasive cervical cancer among uninsured and underinsured women in New Jersey. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30:680–701.
Shaukat A, Church T. Colorectal cancer screening in the USA in the wake of COVID-19. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:726–727.
Kim E, Kojima N, Vangala S, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on primary care quality measures in an academic integrated health system. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37:1161–1168.
Hanna K, Arredondo BL, Chavez MN, et al. Cancer Screening among rural and urban clinics during COVID-19: a multistate qualitative study. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18:e1045–e1055.
Fedewa SA, Star J, Bandi P, et al. Changes in cancer screening in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e2215490.
Simon J, Mohanty N, Masinter L, et al. COVID-19: exploring the repercussions on federally qualified health center service delivery and quality. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32:137–144.
Schad LA, Brady LA, Tumiel-Berhalter LM, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on screening rates for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer: practice feedback from a quality improvement project in primary care. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021;8:347–353.
Sawaya GF, Holt HK, Lamar R, et al. Prioritizing cervical cancer screening services during the COVID-19 pandemic: response of an academic medical center and a public safety net hospital in California. Prev Med. 2021;151:106569.
Myint A, Roh L, Yang L, et al. Noninvasive colorectal cancer screening tests help close screening gaps during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:712–714 e1.
Patel S, Issaka RB, Chen E, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and COVID-19. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:433–434.
Nodora JN, Gupta S, Howard N, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic: identifying adaptive solutions for colorectal cancer screening in underserved communities. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021;113:962–968.
National Association of Community Health Centers. Comunity Health Center Chartbook 2022. Accessed March 6, 2023. https://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/research-fact-sheets-and-infographics/2021-community-health-center-chartbook/
DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa-Ackman SM, Angier HE, et al. A practice-based research network (PBRN) roadmap for evaluating COVID-19 in community health centers: a report from the OCHIN PBRN. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:774–778.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Cervical Cancer Screening. Accessed March 16, 2023. https://ecqi.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ecqm/measures/CMS124v7.html
National Committee for Quality Assurance. Colorectal Cancer Screening. Accessed March 16, 2023. https://ecqi.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/ecqm/measures/CMS130v7.html
Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Re search : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 3rd edn. Sage; 2008.
Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, et al. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002;27:299–309.
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/region/united-states .
Huguet N, Hodes T, Holderness H, et al. Community health centers’ performance in cancer screening and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2022;62:e97–e106.
Chuang E, Pourat N, Chen X, et al. Organizational factors associated with disparities in cervical and colorectal cancer screening rates in community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30:161–181.
Chido-Amajuoyi OG, Shete S. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cancer screening outcomes among screening-compliant women in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:75–77.
Davis MM, Freeman M, Shannon J, et al. A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States—how, what and when? BMC Cancer. 2018;18:40.
Petrik AF, Green B, Schneider J, et al. Factors influencing implementation of a colorectal cancer screening improvement program in community health centers: an applied use of configurational comparative methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(suppl 2):815–822.
Singla AA, Komesaroff P. Self-collected Pap smears may provide an acceptable and effective method of cervical cancer screening. Health Sci Rep. 2018;1:e33.
Mangold BR. Self-collected samples in cervical cancer screening: results of hpv and pap self-collected samples compared to physician-obtained specimens. Acta Cytol. 2019;63:379–384.
American Cancer Society, National Consortium for Cancer Screening and Care. Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Improving Cancer Screening and Care in the US . February 2022. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://consortium.acs4ccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Final-Report-ACS-National-Consortium-Recommendations.pdf
President’s Cancer Panel. Closing Gaps in Cancer Screening: Connecting People, Communities, and Systems to Improve Equity and Access. A Report from the President s Cancer Panel to the President of the United States . 2022. Accessed June 5, 2023. https://prescancerpanel.cancer.gov/report/cancerscreening/pdf/PresCancerPanel_CancerScreening_Feb2022.pdf

Auteurs

Nathalie Huguet (N)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Maria Danna (M)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Andrea Baron (A)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Jennifer Hall (J)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Tahlia Hodes (T)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Jean O'Malley (J)

OCHIN, Portland, OR.

Heather Holderness (H)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Miguel Marino (M)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Jennifer E DeVoe (JE)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Deborah J Cohen (DJ)

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH