Behavioral adjustment moderates the effect of neuroticism on brain volume relative to intracranial volume.

behavioral adjustment brain volume neuroticism

Journal

Journal of personality
ISSN: 1467-6494
Titre abrégé: J Pers
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985194R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2023
Historique:
revised: 23 05 2023
received: 25 10 2022
accepted: 31 05 2023
pmc-release: 13 12 2024
medline: 14 6 2023
pubmed: 14 6 2023
entrez: 13 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The present study examined whether the effect of neuroticism on brain structure is moderated by behavioral adjustment. Neuroticism is widely thought to be harmful to health. However, recent work using proinflammatory biomarkers showed that this effect depends on behavioral adjustment, the willingness and ability to adjust and cope with environmental contingencies, such as different opinions of others or unpredictable life situations. Here, we sought to extend this observation to "brain health" by testing total brain volume (TBV). Using a community sample of 125 Americans, we examined structural magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and quantified TBV. We tested whether the effect of neuroticism on TBV was moderated by behavioral adjustment, net of intracranial volume, age, sex, educational achievement, and race. Behavioral adjustment significantly moderated the effect of neuroticism on TBV, such that neuroticism was associated with lower TBV only when behavioral adjustment was low. There was no such effect when behavioral adjustment was high. The present findings suggest that neuroticism is not debilitating to those who constructively cope with stress. Implications are further discussed.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The present study examined whether the effect of neuroticism on brain structure is moderated by behavioral adjustment.
BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Neuroticism is widely thought to be harmful to health. However, recent work using proinflammatory biomarkers showed that this effect depends on behavioral adjustment, the willingness and ability to adjust and cope with environmental contingencies, such as different opinions of others or unpredictable life situations. Here, we sought to extend this observation to "brain health" by testing total brain volume (TBV).
METHOD METHODS
Using a community sample of 125 Americans, we examined structural magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and quantified TBV. We tested whether the effect of neuroticism on TBV was moderated by behavioral adjustment, net of intracranial volume, age, sex, educational achievement, and race.
RESULTS RESULTS
Behavioral adjustment significantly moderated the effect of neuroticism on TBV, such that neuroticism was associated with lower TBV only when behavioral adjustment was low. There was no such effect when behavioral adjustment was high.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The present findings suggest that neuroticism is not debilitating to those who constructively cope with stress. Implications are further discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37311929
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12858
pmc: PMC10716358
mid: NIHMS1914836
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U01 AG077928
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG051426
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Personality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):139-51
pubmed: 24405294
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1102-17
pubmed: 17547491
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:194-208
pubmed: 23063449
Magn Reson Med. 1990 Jul;15(1):152-7
pubmed: 2374495
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:366-72
pubmed: 25255942
Psychosom Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;74(6):596-603
pubmed: 22753630
J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 Feb;103(1):103-16
pubmed: 8040472
Psychosom Med. 1998 May-Jun;60(3):359-61
pubmed: 9625225
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:435-67
pubmed: 17716078
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;21(6):820-8
pubmed: 20435951
Neuroimage. 2000 Jun;11(6 Pt 1):805-21
pubmed: 10860804
Neuroinformatics. 2015 Oct;13(4):427-41
pubmed: 25822811
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jan;37(1):59-72
pubmed: 23068306
Psychol Bull. 2005 Mar;131(2):260-300
pubmed: 15740422
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1345-1357
pubmed: 28703694
Am Psychol. 1993 Jan;48(1):26-34
pubmed: 8427480
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 May;109(5):392-9
pubmed: 15049775
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Apr 1;12(4):671-684
pubmed: 28122961
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:719-42
pubmed: 24405364
Brain Behav Immun. 2013 Feb;28:83-9
pubmed: 23123863
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 May;64(5):847-60
pubmed: 8505713
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Nov 1;50(9):685-90
pubmed: 11704075
J Pers. 2000 Dec;68(6):1089-107
pubmed: 11130733
JAMA. 1992 Mar 4;267(9):1244-52
pubmed: 1538563
Nebr Symp Motiv. 2003;49:1-57
pubmed: 14569670
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001 Mar;189(3):154-61
pubmed: 11277351
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jun;44(6):809-822
pubmed: 29380686
J Res Pers. 2012 Jun 1;46(3):295-305
pubmed: 22773867
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Dec;50:181-93
pubmed: 25233337
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Dec;16(12):1809-19
pubmed: 16421327

Auteurs

Qinggang Yu (Q)

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Stacey M Schaefer (SM)

Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Richard J Davidson (RJ)

Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Shinobu Kitayama (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Classifications MeSH