Associations of water contact frequency, duration, and activities with schistosome infection risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
13
02
2023
accepted:
12
05
2023
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
14
6
2023
entrez:
14
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Schistosomiasis is a water-borne parasitic disease which affects over 230 million people globally. The relationship between contact with open freshwater bodies and the likelihood of schistosome infection remains poorly quantified despite its importance for understanding transmission and parametrising transmission models. We conducted a systematic review to estimate the average effect of water contact duration, frequency, and activities on schistosome infection likelihood. We searched Embase, MEDLINE (including PubMed), Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until May 13, 2022. Observational and interventional studies reporting odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), or sufficient information to reconstruct effect sizes on individual-level associations between water contact and infection with any Schistosoma species were eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was used to calculate pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We screened 1,411 studies and included 101 studies which represented 192,691 participants across Africa, Asia, and South America. Included studies mostly reported on water contact activities (69%; 70/101) and having any water contact (33%; 33/101). Ninety-six percent of studies (97/101) used surveys to measure exposure. A meta-analysis of 33 studies showed that individuals with water contact were 3.14 times more likely to be infected (OR 3.14; 95% CI: 2.08-4.75) when compared to individuals with no water contact. Subgroup analyses showed that the positive association of water contact with infection was significantly weaker in children compared to studies which included adults and children (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04-2.69 vs. OR 4.24; 95% CI: 2.59-6.97). An association of water contact with infection was only found in communities with ≥10% schistosome prevalence. Overall heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 93%) and remained high across all subgroups, except in direct observation studies (I2 range = 44%-98%). We did not find that occupational water contact such as fishing and agriculture (OR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.89-3.51) conferred a significantly higher risk of schistosome infection compared to recreational water contact (OR 2.13; 95% CI: 1.75-2.60) or domestic water contact (OR 1.91; 95% CI: 1.47-2.48). Higher duration or frequency of water contact did not significantly modify infection likelihood. Study quality across analyses was largely moderate or poor. Any current water contact was robustly associated with schistosome infection status, and this relationship held across adults and children, and schistosomiasis-endemic areas with prevalence greater than 10%. Substantial gaps remain in published studies for understanding interactions of water contact with age and gender, and the influence of these interactions for infection likelihood. As such, more empirical studies are needed to accurately parametrise exposure in transmission models. Our results imply the need for population-wide treatment and prevention strategies in endemic settings as exposure within these communities was not confined to currently prioritised high-risk groups such as fishing populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Schistosomiasis is a water-borne parasitic disease which affects over 230 million people globally. The relationship between contact with open freshwater bodies and the likelihood of schistosome infection remains poorly quantified despite its importance for understanding transmission and parametrising transmission models.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to estimate the average effect of water contact duration, frequency, and activities on schistosome infection likelihood. We searched Embase, MEDLINE (including PubMed), Global Health, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until May 13, 2022. Observational and interventional studies reporting odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), or sufficient information to reconstruct effect sizes on individual-level associations between water contact and infection with any Schistosoma species were eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting was used to calculate pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
We screened 1,411 studies and included 101 studies which represented 192,691 participants across Africa, Asia, and South America. Included studies mostly reported on water contact activities (69%; 70/101) and having any water contact (33%; 33/101). Ninety-six percent of studies (97/101) used surveys to measure exposure. A meta-analysis of 33 studies showed that individuals with water contact were 3.14 times more likely to be infected (OR 3.14; 95% CI: 2.08-4.75) when compared to individuals with no water contact. Subgroup analyses showed that the positive association of water contact with infection was significantly weaker in children compared to studies which included adults and children (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04-2.69 vs. OR 4.24; 95% CI: 2.59-6.97). An association of water contact with infection was only found in communities with ≥10% schistosome prevalence. Overall heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 93%) and remained high across all subgroups, except in direct observation studies (I2 range = 44%-98%). We did not find that occupational water contact such as fishing and agriculture (OR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.89-3.51) conferred a significantly higher risk of schistosome infection compared to recreational water contact (OR 2.13; 95% CI: 1.75-2.60) or domestic water contact (OR 1.91; 95% CI: 1.47-2.48). Higher duration or frequency of water contact did not significantly modify infection likelihood. Study quality across analyses was largely moderate or poor.
CONCLUSIONS
Any current water contact was robustly associated with schistosome infection status, and this relationship held across adults and children, and schistosomiasis-endemic areas with prevalence greater than 10%. Substantial gaps remain in published studies for understanding interactions of water contact with age and gender, and the influence of these interactions for infection likelihood. As such, more empirical studies are needed to accurately parametrise exposure in transmission models. Our results imply the need for population-wide treatment and prevention strategies in endemic settings as exposure within these communities was not confined to currently prioritised high-risk groups such as fishing populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37315020
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011377
pii: PNTD-D-23-00185
pmc: PMC10266691
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0011377Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 204826/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Reitzug et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Mar 17;8:163
pubmed: 25890278
Trends Parasitol. 2001 Jun;17(6):256-61
pubmed: 11378014
Parasitology. 1991 Dec;103 Pt 3:363-70
pubmed: 1780173
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Aug 04;9(1):428
pubmed: 27492409
Trop Med Int Health. 2007 Jun;12(6):724-35
pubmed: 17550469
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Oct 5;15(10):e0009806
pubmed: 34610025
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Apr;44(7):949-68
pubmed: 9089917
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0253115
pubmed: 34534220
Mol Cell Probes. 2017 Feb;31:2-21
pubmed: 27986555
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Bull World Health Organ. 1978;56(3):417-26
pubmed: 308406
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):1027-1031
pubmed: 30166065
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022 May 2;116(5):433-439
pubmed: 34634127
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 27;15(9):e0009712
pubmed: 34570777
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0258915
pubmed: 34735487
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1972 Nov-Dec;14(6):397-400
pubmed: 4675644
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(5):495-505
pubmed: 3118479
Bull World Health Organ. 1966;35(3):377-87
pubmed: 5297633
Parasitology. 1999 Jan;118 ( Pt 1):101-5
pubmed: 10070667
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1987;81(1):29-35
pubmed: 3127957
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Dec 26;7(12):e2608
pubmed: 24386499
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 17;15(11):e0009083
pubmed: 34788280
Parasitol Today. 1998 Oct;14(10):428-34
pubmed: 17040835
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Jul-Aug;90(4):362-65
pubmed: 8882176
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Dec;42(12):5458-61
pubmed: 15583265
Br Med Bull. 1972 Jan;28(1):55-9
pubmed: 4562682
Parasitology. 1996 Jan;112 ( Pt 1):21-35
pubmed: 8587799
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1980 Jun;74(3):347-54
pubmed: 7396567
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Aug;4(8):e330-e342
pubmed: 32800151
Parasitol Today. 1994 Oct;10(10):380-4
pubmed: 15275541
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):338-42
pubmed: 8990210
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Oct 8;12(10):e0006717
pubmed: 30296257
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):e165-e172
pubmed: 32595046
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Sep 14;4(9):
pubmed: 20856909
Nature. 1991 Jun 27;351(6329):757-9
pubmed: 1905786
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2001 Jan;9(1):13-22
pubmed: 11253273
J Trop Med Hyg. 1987 Oct;90(5):265-81
pubmed: 3118054
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jul 24;8(7):e2865
pubmed: 25058013
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 May 13;15(5):e0009351
pubmed: 33983937
Cent Afr J Med. 1987 Jan;33(1):8-15
pubmed: 3690652
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Feb;51(1):103-109
pubmed: 26993097
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Oct 18;105(6):1772-1781
pubmed: 34662868
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 May 11;15(5):e0009380
pubmed: 33974623
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Jul 1;112(7):361-365
pubmed: 29992295
Tropenmed Parasitol. 1982 Dec;33(4):227-8
pubmed: 7164164
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Mar 13;8:156
pubmed: 25884172
Parasitology. 2009 Nov;136(13):1719-30
pubmed: 19631008
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000 Feb;62(2 Suppl):88-99
pubmed: 10813505
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Feb;66(2):157-62
pubmed: 12135287
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;37(9):1709-1716
pubmed: 29974279
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1985 Jun;79(3):287-99
pubmed: 4026440
Lancet Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;6(7):411-25
pubmed: 16790382
Sci Data. 2018 Oct 30;5:180214
pubmed: 30375988
Geospat Health. 2012 Nov;7(1):1-13
pubmed: 23242675
Parasitology. 1996 Sep;113 ( Pt 3):223-41
pubmed: 8811848
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jul 18;11:198
pubmed: 21767372
Infect Dis Model. 2021 Feb 04;6:438-447
pubmed: 33665519
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun 12;8(6):e2888
pubmed: 24922530
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Aug 14;13(8):e0007617
pubmed: 31412023
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Feb;8(2):100-8
pubmed: 12581433
Acta Trop. 2019 Feb;190:257-268
pubmed: 30261186
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984;78(1):108-23
pubmed: 6710563
Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(1):57-66
pubmed: 3107847
BMJ. 2011 Jul 22;343:d4002
pubmed: 21784880
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Dec 04;8(12):e3296
pubmed: 25474705