Public Officials' Engagement on Social Media During the Rollout of the COVID-19 Vaccine: Content Analysis of Tweets.
COVID-19
Twitter
public officials
sentiment analysis
vaccines
Journal
JMIR infodemiology
ISSN: 2564-1891
Titre abrégé: JMIR Infodemiology
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9918249014806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jul 2023
20 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
accepted:
30
05
2023
revised:
27
03
2023
medline:
14
6
2023
pubmed:
14
6
2023
entrez:
14
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social media is an important way for governments to communicate with the public. This is particularly true in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, during which government officials played a strong role in promoting public health measures such as vaccines. In Canada, provincial COVID-19 vaccine rollout was delivered in 3 phases aligned with federal government COVID-19 vaccine guidance for priority populations. In this study, we examined how Canadian public officials used Twitter to engage with the public about vaccine rollout and how this engagement has shaped public response to vaccines across jurisdictions. We conducted a content analysis of tweets posted between December 28, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Leveraging the social media artificial intelligence tool Brandwatch Analytics, we constructed a list of public officials in 3 jurisdictions (Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia) organized across 6 public official types and then conducted an English and French keyword search for tweets about vaccine rollout and delivery that mentioned, retweeted, or replied to the public officials. We identified the top 30 tweets with the highest impressions in each jurisdiction in each of the 3 phases (approximately a 26-day window) of the vaccine rollout. The metrics of engagement (impressions, retweets, likes, and replies) from the top 30 tweets per phase in each jurisdiction were extracted for additional annotation. We specifically annotated sentiment toward public officials' vaccine responses (ie, positive, negative, and neutral) in each tweet and annotated the type of social media engagement. A thematic analysis of tweets was then conducted to add nuance to extracted data characterizing sentiment and interaction type. Among the 6 categories of public officials, 142 prominent accounts were included from Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. In total, 270 tweets were included in the content analysis and 212 tweets were direct tweets by public officials. Public officials mostly used Twitter for information provision (139/212, 65.6%), followed by horizontal engagement (37/212, 17.5%), citizen engagement (24/212, 11.3%), and public service announcements (12/212, 5.7%). Information provision by government bodies (eg, provincial government and public health authorities) or municipal leaders is more prominent than tweets by other public official groups. Neutral sentiment accounted for 51.5% (139/270) of all the tweets, whereas positive sentiment was the second most common sentiment (117/270, 43.3%). In Ontario, 60% (54/90) of the tweets were positive. Negative sentiment (eg, public officials criticizing vaccine rollout) accounted for 12% (11/90) of all the tweets. As governments continue to promote the uptake of the COVID-19 booster doses, findings from this study are useful in informing how governments can best use social media to engage with the public to achieve democratic goals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Social media is an important way for governments to communicate with the public. This is particularly true in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, during which government officials played a strong role in promoting public health measures such as vaccines.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
In Canada, provincial COVID-19 vaccine rollout was delivered in 3 phases aligned with federal government COVID-19 vaccine guidance for priority populations. In this study, we examined how Canadian public officials used Twitter to engage with the public about vaccine rollout and how this engagement has shaped public response to vaccines across jurisdictions.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a content analysis of tweets posted between December 28, 2020, and August 31, 2021. Leveraging the social media artificial intelligence tool Brandwatch Analytics, we constructed a list of public officials in 3 jurisdictions (Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia) organized across 6 public official types and then conducted an English and French keyword search for tweets about vaccine rollout and delivery that mentioned, retweeted, or replied to the public officials. We identified the top 30 tweets with the highest impressions in each jurisdiction in each of the 3 phases (approximately a 26-day window) of the vaccine rollout. The metrics of engagement (impressions, retweets, likes, and replies) from the top 30 tweets per phase in each jurisdiction were extracted for additional annotation. We specifically annotated sentiment toward public officials' vaccine responses (ie, positive, negative, and neutral) in each tweet and annotated the type of social media engagement. A thematic analysis of tweets was then conducted to add nuance to extracted data characterizing sentiment and interaction type.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 6 categories of public officials, 142 prominent accounts were included from Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. In total, 270 tweets were included in the content analysis and 212 tweets were direct tweets by public officials. Public officials mostly used Twitter for information provision (139/212, 65.6%), followed by horizontal engagement (37/212, 17.5%), citizen engagement (24/212, 11.3%), and public service announcements (12/212, 5.7%). Information provision by government bodies (eg, provincial government and public health authorities) or municipal leaders is more prominent than tweets by other public official groups. Neutral sentiment accounted for 51.5% (139/270) of all the tweets, whereas positive sentiment was the second most common sentiment (117/270, 43.3%). In Ontario, 60% (54/90) of the tweets were positive. Negative sentiment (eg, public officials criticizing vaccine rollout) accounted for 12% (11/90) of all the tweets.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
As governments continue to promote the uptake of the COVID-19 booster doses, findings from this study are useful in informing how governments can best use social media to engage with the public to achieve democratic goals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37315194
pii: v3i1e41582
doi: 10.2196/41582
pmc: PMC10361259
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e41582Informations de copyright
©Husayn Marani, Melodie Yunju Song, Margaret Jamieson, Monika Roerig, Sara Allin. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 20.07.2023.
Références
Digit Health. 2022 Mar 31;8:20552076221090041
pubmed: 35392254
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 May;48(5):750-765
pubmed: 34180276
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Dec;8:100119
pubmed: 34173443
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022 Jan 18;5(3):1682
pubmed: 35141430
Health Place. 2021 May;69:102568
pubmed: 33865003
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1):
pubmed: 34934011
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33097547
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 13;23(4):e26874
pubmed: 33769946
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 5;22(11):e21646
pubmed: 33052871
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0147617
pubmed: 26886112
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e175-e194
pubmed: 33518503
J Health Commun. 2018;23(4):399-411
pubmed: 29601271
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Sep 2;17(9):2868-2872
pubmed: 33970786
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):149-162
pubmed: 34543519
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2360-2365
pubmed: 33812742
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2016 Dec 01;42(12):246-251
pubmed: 29769995
Cities. 2022 Feb;121:103453
pubmed: 34566232