Tele-dentistry, its trends, scope, and future framework in oral medicine; a scoping review during January 1999 to December 2021.
Barriers
Facilitators
Oral medicine
Tele-dentistry
Journal
Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
ISSN: 0778-7367
Titre abrégé: Arch Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208826
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jun 2023
14 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
accepted:
05
06
2023
medline:
15
6
2023
pubmed:
15
6
2023
entrez:
14
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tele-dentistry has been increasingly used for different purposes of visit, consultation, triage, screening, and training in oral medicine. This study aims to determine the main facilitators, barriers, and participants` viewpoints of applying tele-dentistry in oral medicine and develop a framework indicating the input, process, output, and feedback. This was a scoping review conducted in 2022 applying Arksey and O'Malley (2005) approach. Four databases including ISI web of science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched from January 1999 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria consisted of all original and non-original articles (reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and book chapters), and dissertations in English with a full text electronic file. Excel Descriptive results show that among 59 included articles, 27 (46%) have addressed the various applications of tele-dentistry during COVID-19 pandemic in the field of oral medicine. From geographical distribution perspective, most of the papers were published in Brazil (n = 13)/ 22.03%, India (n = 7)/11.86% and USA (n = 6)/10.17%. Thematic analysis shows that seven main themes of "information", "skill", "human resource", 'technical", "administrative', 'financial', and 'training and education' are explored as facilitators. 'Individual', 'environmental', 'organizational', 'regulation', 'clinical', and 'technical barriers' are also identified as main barriers of tele-dentistry in oral medicine. According to the results for using tele-dentistry services in oral medicine, a diverse category of facilitators should be considered and at the same time, different barriers should be managed. Users` satisfaction and perceived usefulness of tele-dentistry as final outcomes can be increased considering the system`s feedback and applying facilitator incentives as well as decreasing the barriers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tele-dentistry has been increasingly used for different purposes of visit, consultation, triage, screening, and training in oral medicine. This study aims to determine the main facilitators, barriers, and participants` viewpoints of applying tele-dentistry in oral medicine and develop a framework indicating the input, process, output, and feedback.
METHOD
METHODS
This was a scoping review conducted in 2022 applying Arksey and O'Malley (2005) approach. Four databases including ISI web of science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched from January 1999 to December 2021. Inclusion criteria consisted of all original and non-original articles (reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and book chapters), and dissertations in English with a full text electronic file. Excel
RESULTS
RESULTS
Descriptive results show that among 59 included articles, 27 (46%) have addressed the various applications of tele-dentistry during COVID-19 pandemic in the field of oral medicine. From geographical distribution perspective, most of the papers were published in Brazil (n = 13)/ 22.03%, India (n = 7)/11.86% and USA (n = 6)/10.17%. Thematic analysis shows that seven main themes of "information", "skill", "human resource", 'technical", "administrative', 'financial', and 'training and education' are explored as facilitators. 'Individual', 'environmental', 'organizational', 'regulation', 'clinical', and 'technical barriers' are also identified as main barriers of tele-dentistry in oral medicine.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
According to the results for using tele-dentistry services in oral medicine, a diverse category of facilitators should be considered and at the same time, different barriers should be managed. Users` satisfaction and perceived usefulness of tele-dentistry as final outcomes can be increased considering the system`s feedback and applying facilitator incentives as well as decreasing the barriers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37316914
doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01128-w
pii: 10.1186/s13690-023-01128-w
pmc: PMC10265557
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
104Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Sep;18(7):549-53
pubmed: 22823077
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr;23(e1):e142-5
pubmed: 26510877
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):528-532
pubmed: 28236609
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011 Jul;1(2):37-44
pubmed: 24478952
Oral Dis. 2022 Nov;28 Suppl 2:2400-2405
pubmed: 34390095
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Apr;23(4):327-333
pubmed: 27802117
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(8):435-8
pubmed: 19047454
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Mar;123(3):408
pubmed: 28153125
Oral Dis. 2022 Sep;28(6):1573-1579
pubmed: 34289201
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Feb;152(2):127-135
pubmed: 33494867
Oral Dis. 2021 Apr;27 Suppl 3:744-745
pubmed: 32307831
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Feb;19(2):117-21
pubmed: 23356381
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854
pubmed: 32356468
Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28 Suppl 1:929-932
pubmed: 33043546
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Oct 21;14:4369-4378
pubmed: 34707420
Oral Dis. 2021 Apr;27 Suppl 3:764-765
pubmed: 32474992
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;59(5):605-608
pubmed: 33863593
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Jul;130(1):127-128
pubmed: 32451230
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):379-87
pubmed: 22502634
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Mar;23(3):192-199
pubmed: 27541205
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jul;19(7):565-7
pubmed: 23672799
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):493-500
pubmed: 32837687
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2019 Dec;17(2):115-123
pubmed: 32669987
Oral Dis. 2021 Apr;27 Suppl 3:754-756
pubmed: 32369675
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1166-1172
pubmed: 32568392
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Jan;23(1):44-52
pubmed: 26721829
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1122-1128
pubmed: 30287715
Discoveries (Craiova). 2022 Sep 30;10(3):153
pubmed: 36530958
Spec Care Dentist. 2022 Jan;42(1):86-90
pubmed: 34329504
Int J Telemed Appl. 2021 Feb 16;2021:8859746
pubmed: 33628231
Br Dent J. 2010 Oct 23;209(8):399-404
pubmed: 20966999
Spec Care Dentist. 2021 Sep;41(5):639-643
pubmed: 34029421
J Am Dent Assoc. 2015 Dec;146(12):886-94
pubmed: 26610833
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Mar;26(3):278-285
pubmed: 31081720
Virchows Arch. 2021 Sep;479(3):585-595
pubmed: 33713188
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Sep;27(8):509-517
pubmed: 31903839
Eur J Dent. 2020 Dec;14(S 01):S20-S26
pubmed: 33032333
Indian J Cancer. 2019 Apr-Jun;56(2):107-113
pubmed: 31062727
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Apr;24(3):147-156
pubmed: 28118778
Oral Dis. 2021 Apr;27 Suppl 3:793-795
pubmed: 32557965
J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Jun;26(5):285-293
pubmed: 30646814
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0233572
pubmed: 32502156
Gerodontology. 2021 Dec;38(4):351-365
pubmed: 34523172
Braz Dent J. 1999;10(1):47-53
pubmed: 10863389
Int Dent J. 2021 Oct;71(5):384-389
pubmed: 33618833
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;12(5):
pubmed: 35626185
Oral Dis. 2018 Sep;24(6):1012-1019
pubmed: 29505701
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Mar;121(3):248-54
pubmed: 26868466
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Jun 23;:1357633X211028513
pubmed: 34160332
Oral Dis. 2022 Apr;28 Suppl 1:947-949
pubmed: 32623802
Dent Clin North Am. 2009 Jul;53(3):537-48
pubmed: 19482128
Aust J Rural Health. 2019 Apr;27(2):170-176
pubmed: 30942518
Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 29;2021:6814027
pubmed: 34745263
Oral Oncol. 2021 Jul;118:105331
pubmed: 34024725
Dent Med Probl. 2021 Apr-Jun;58(2):215-218
pubmed: 33974750
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 10;10(1):222
pubmed: 34376247
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2021 Jul 30;11(4):414-420
pubmed: 34430503