Controlled Hookworm Infection for Medication-free Maintenance in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Pilot, Double-blind, Randomized Control Trial.

clinical trial helminth hookworm inflammatory bowel disease ulcerative colitis

Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 26 02 2023
medline: 15 6 2023
pubmed: 15 6 2023
entrez: 15 6 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Human hookworm has been proposed as a treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm to maintain clinical remission in patients with UC. Twenty patients with UC in disease remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤4 and fecal calprotectin (fCal) <100 ug/g) and only on 5-aminosalicylate received 30 hookworm larvae or placebo. Participants stopped 5-aminosalicylate after 12 weeks. Participants were monitored for up to 52 weeks and exited the study if they had a UC flare (SCCAI ≥5 and fCal ≥200 µg/g). The primary outcome was difference in rates of clinical remission at week 52. Differences were assessed for quality of life (QoL) and feasibility aspects including recruitment, safety, effectiveness of blinding, and viability of the hookworm infection. At 52 weeks, 4 of 10 (40%) participants in the hookworm group and 5 of 10 (50%) participants in the placebo group had maintained clinical remission (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.92). Median time to flare in the hookworm group was 231 days (interquartile range [IQR], 98-365) and 259 days for placebo (IQR, 132-365). Blinding was quite successful in the placebo group (Bang's blinding index 0.22; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1) but less successful in the hookworm group (0.70; 95% CI, 0.37-1.0). Almost all participants in the hookworm group had detectable eggs in their faeces (90%; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98), and all participants in this group developed eosinophilia (peak eosinophilia 4.35 × 10^9/L; IQR, 2.80-6.68). Adverse events experienced were generally mild, and there was no significant difference in QoL. A full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm therapy as a maintenance treatment in patients with UC appears feasible. This pilot study has shown a full-scale RCT examining hookworm therapy as maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is feasible, safe, and will be well-tolerated.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Human hookworm has been proposed as a treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm to maintain clinical remission in patients with UC.
METHODS METHODS
Twenty patients with UC in disease remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤4 and fecal calprotectin (fCal) <100 ug/g) and only on 5-aminosalicylate received 30 hookworm larvae or placebo. Participants stopped 5-aminosalicylate after 12 weeks. Participants were monitored for up to 52 weeks and exited the study if they had a UC flare (SCCAI ≥5 and fCal ≥200 µg/g). The primary outcome was difference in rates of clinical remission at week 52. Differences were assessed for quality of life (QoL) and feasibility aspects including recruitment, safety, effectiveness of blinding, and viability of the hookworm infection.
RESULTS RESULTS
At 52 weeks, 4 of 10 (40%) participants in the hookworm group and 5 of 10 (50%) participants in the placebo group had maintained clinical remission (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.92). Median time to flare in the hookworm group was 231 days (interquartile range [IQR], 98-365) and 259 days for placebo (IQR, 132-365). Blinding was quite successful in the placebo group (Bang's blinding index 0.22; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1) but less successful in the hookworm group (0.70; 95% CI, 0.37-1.0). Almost all participants in the hookworm group had detectable eggs in their faeces (90%; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98), and all participants in this group developed eosinophilia (peak eosinophilia 4.35 × 10^9/L; IQR, 2.80-6.68). Adverse events experienced were generally mild, and there was no significant difference in QoL.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm therapy as a maintenance treatment in patients with UC appears feasible.
This pilot study has shown a full-scale RCT examining hookworm therapy as maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is feasible, safe, and will be well-tolerated.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
This pilot study has shown a full-scale RCT examining hookworm therapy as maintenance therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis is feasible, safe, and will be well-tolerated.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37318363
pii: 7198522
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izad110
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Health Research Council of New Zealand

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.

Auteurs

Thomas C Mules (TC)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Brittany Lavender (B)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Kate Maclean (K)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Francesco Vacca (F)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Sophia-Louise Noble (SL)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Bibek Yumnam (B)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Tama Te Kawa (T)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Alissa Cait (A)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Jeffry Tang (J)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

David O'Sullivan (D)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Olivier Gasser (O)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

James Stanley (J)

Biostatistics Group, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Graham Le Gros (G)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Mali Camberis (M)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.

Stephen Inns (S)

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH