Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 2 enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses.
Journal
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
ISSN: 1873-4502
Titre abrégé: J Cataract Refract Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8604171
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2023
01 09 2023
Historique:
received:
16
03
2023
accepted:
13
06
2023
medline:
29
8
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the visual performance, spectacle independence, and subjective visual quality of 2 enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): Eyhance ICB00 and ZOE Primus-HD. Ophthalmology Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. Prospective case series. Patients without ocular comorbidities and corneal astigmatism <0.75 diopters (D) undergoing cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of enhanced monofocal Eyhance and ZOE were included. 6 months postoperatively, the following parameters were analyzed: subjective and objective refraction; monocular and binocular corrected (4 m) and uncorrected (UDVA) distance visual acuities; corrected distance, intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) visual acuities, as well as uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and uncorrected near (UNVA) visual acuities; photopic contrast sensitivity; binocular defocus curve; halo and glare perception; and spectacle independence. 100 eyes of 50 patients were evaluated (25 patients per IOL group). The 2 IOLs showed superimposable visual performances, without significant differences in terms of refractive and visual outcomes, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, scores of vision quality, and spectacle independence. Of note, monocular and binocular UDVA was excellent in both groups. The 2 IOL models achieved satisfactory binocular UIVA, with more than 70% of patients reaching a binocular UIVA of ≤0.1 logMAR. Up to 84% of patients eventually declared to feel comfortable frequently while staying at intermediate distance. The general visual outcome of the Eyhance ICB00 and the ZOE Primus-HD enhanced monofocal IOLs is similar, with special reference to the satisfactory spectacle independence for intermediate distance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37322813
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001239
pii: 02158034-990000000-00231
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
929-935Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
Références
Häring G, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Weissmantel U, Kröncke W. Subjective photic phenomena with refractive multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: results of a multicenter questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:245–249
Rosen E, Alió JL, Dick HB, Dell S, Slade S. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42:310–328
Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:638–648
Shen Z, Lin Y, Zhu Y, Liu X, Yan J, Yao K. Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:45337
Gigon E, Bouthour W, Panos GD, Pajic B, Massa H. Real world outcomes of the new Tecnis Eyhance IOL. Eur J Ophthalmol 2023;33:1390–1397
Corbelli E, Iuliano L, Bandello F, Fasce F. Comparative analysis of visual outcome with 3 intraocular lenses: monofocal, enhanced monofocal, and extended depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022;48:67–74
Mencucci R, Cennamo M, Venturi D, Vignapiano R, Favuzza E. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020;46:378–387
Steinbeis Transfer Center: Vision Research. Stuttgart, Germany: IOL Con; 2023. Available at: https://iolcon.org/ . Accessed May 1, 2023
Sullivan BD, Whitmer D, Nichols KK, Tomlinson A, Foulks GN, Geerling G, Pepose JS, Kosheleff V, Porreco A, Lemp MA. An objective approach to dry eye disease severity. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6125–6130
Fernández J, Ribeiro FJ, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Dupps WJ, Werner L, Srinivasan S, Kohnen T. Standard for collecting and reporting outcomes of IOL-based refractive surgery: update for enhanced monofocal, EDOF, and multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022;48:1235–1241
Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Bonetto J, Demasi C, Aiello F, Nucci C, Mariotti C, Marchini G. Quality of vision, patient satisfaction and long-term visual function after bilateral implantation of a low addition multifocal intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol 2018;38:1709–1716
Pedrotti E, Mastropasqua R, Passilongo M, Parisi G, Marchesoni I, Marchini G. Comparison of two multifocal intraocular lens designs that differ only in near add. J Refract Surg 2014;31:754–760
Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, McDonnell PJ. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2292–2301
Morlock R, Wirth RJ, Tally SR, Garufis C, Heichel CWD. Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ): development and validation. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;178:101–114
Łabuz G, Son HS, Naujokaitis T, Yildirim TM, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. Laboratory investigation of preclinical visual-quality metrics and halo-size in enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Ther 2021;10:1093–1104
Pedrotti E, Carones F, Aiello F, Mastropasqua R, Bruni E, Bonacci E, Talli P, Nucci C, Mariotti C, Marchini G. Comparative analysis of visual outcomes with 4 intraocular lenses: monofocal, multifocal, and extended range of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018;44:156–167
Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 7th ed. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2011
Megiddo-Barnir E, Alió JL. Latest development in extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses: an update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2023;12:58–79
Breyer DRH, Kaymak H, Ax T, Kretz FTA, Auffarth GU, Hagen PR. Multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2017;6:339–349
Pedrotti E, Bruni E, Bonacci E, Badalamenti R, Mastropasqua R, Marchini G. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with a monofocal and an extended range of vision intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2016;32:436–442
Mojzis P, Majerova K, Hrckova L, Piñero DP. Implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens: one-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:1623–1630
Ota Y, Minami K, Oki S, Bissen-Miyajima H, Okamoto K, Nakashima M, Tsubota K. Subjective and objective refractions in eyes with extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses using echelette optics: clinical and experimental study. Acta Ophthalmol 2021;99:e837–e843
Wan KH, Au ACK, Kua WN, Ng ALK, Cheng GPM, Lam NM, Chow VWS. Enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens in cataract surgery: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 2022;38:538–546
Cinar E, Bolu H, Erbakan G, Yuce B, Aslan F, Fece M, Emre S. Vision outcomes with a new monofocal IOL. Int Ophthalmol 2021;41:491–498
Hristova R, Tsvetkova G, Cholakova D, Ivanova G, Haykin V. Presbyopia correction with a new extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Rom J Ophthalmol 2022;66:240–244
Ouchi M, Kinoshita S. Implantation of refractive multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section for cataract eyes complicated with a coexisting ocular pathology. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:649–655
Jeon S, Choi A, Kwon H. Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof Vivity intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022;260:3883–3888