Web-based psychoacoustics: Hearing screening, infrastructure, and validation.
Crowd-sourcing
Online auditory experiments
Psychoacoustics
Remote hearing screening
Web-based testing
Journal
Behavior research methods
ISSN: 1554-3528
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244316
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jun 2023
08 Jun 2023
Historique:
accepted:
01
03
2023
pmc-release:
08
12
2024
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Anonymous web-based experiments are increasingly used in many domains of behavioral research. However, online studies of auditory perception, especially of psychoacoustic phenomena pertaining to low-level sensory processing, are challenging because of limited available control of the acoustics, and the inability to perform audiometry to confirm normal-hearing status of participants. Here, we outline our approach to mitigate these challenges and validate our procedures by comparing web-based measurements to lab-based data on a range of classic psychoacoustic tasks. Individual tasks were created using jsPsych, an open-source JavaScript front-end library. Dynamic sequences of psychoacoustic tasks were implemented using Django, an open-source library for web applications, and combined with consent pages, questionnaires, and debriefing pages. Subjects were recruited via Prolific, a subject recruitment platform for web-based studies. Guided by a meta-analysis of lab-based data, we developed and validated a screening procedure to select participants for (putative) normal-hearing status based on their responses in a suprathreshold task and a survey. Headphone use was standardized by supplementing procedures from prior literature with a binaural hearing task. Individuals meeting all criteria were re-invited to complete a range of classic psychoacoustic tasks. For the re-invited participants, absolute thresholds were in excellent agreement with lab-based data for fundamental frequency discrimination, gap detection, and sensitivity to interaural time delay and level difference. Furthermore, word identification scores, consonant confusion patterns, and co-modulation masking release effect also matched lab-based studies. Our results suggest that web-based psychoacoustics is a viable complement to lab-based research. Source code for our infrastructure is provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37326771
doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02101-9
pii: 10.3758/s13428-023-02101-9
pmc: PMC10704001
mid: NIHMS1941229
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F31 DC017381
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : T32DC016853
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : F31DC017381
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01DC015989
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : T32 DC016853
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC015989
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan;85(1):273-81
pubmed: 2921409
J Speech Hear Res. 1972 Jun;15(2):287-95
pubmed: 5047866
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7703-7714
pubmed: 31391262
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2064-2072
pubmed: 28695541
Hear Res. 2021 Sep 15;409:108333
pubmed: 34425347
Elife. 2020 Sep 30;9:
pubmed: 32996463
Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):103-38
pubmed: 2228789
PeerJ. 2015 Jul 23;3:e1058
pubmed: 26244107
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 3;7(1):12624
pubmed: 28974705
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 May;149(5):3311
pubmed: 34241116
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Oct;146(4):2562
pubmed: 31671986
J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 Nov;14(9):453-70
pubmed: 14708835
J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Sep;14(3):589-95
pubmed: 5163893
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Mar 17;64(3):707-724
pubmed: 33606960
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1851-2
pubmed: 22083573
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2395-405
pubmed: 15532670
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 21;10(1):6704
pubmed: 32317648
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:877-902
pubmed: 25251483
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 May;151(5):3116
pubmed: 35649891
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:27-50
pubmed: 29035691
Iperception. 2013 Jul 29;4(6):365-79
pubmed: 24349696
eNeuro. 2022 Mar 11;9(2):
pubmed: 35193890
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 08;6:19114
pubmed: 26743329
Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div. 1963 Jun;86:1-44
pubmed: 14131127
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Dec;1(9):327-33
pubmed: 21223942
Int J Audiol. 2004 Jan;43(1):15-28
pubmed: 14974624
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):E3313-E3322
pubmed: 29563229
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12
pubmed: 24683129
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 12;42(2):240-254
pubmed: 34764159
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;35(5):2161-72
pubmed: 25653371
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2312-26
pubmed: 17471744
Vision Res. 2016 May;122:105-123
pubmed: 27013261
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Mar;34(3):114-23
pubmed: 21196054
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):52-66
pubmed: 30221202
J Am Audiol Soc. 1976 Sep-Oct;2(2):61-7
pubmed: 977431
Vital Health Stat 10. 2014 Feb;(260):1-161
pubmed: 24819891
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1551-1562
pubmed: 33300103
Arch Otolaryngol. 1984 May;110(5):290-6
pubmed: 6712516
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Oct;150(4):2664
pubmed: 34717498
Cognition. 2019 Dec;193:104026
pubmed: 31323377
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99
pubmed: 8132902
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Sep;150(3):2230
pubmed: 34598642
Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):1035-41
pubmed: 20493704
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):757-67
pubmed: 23169193
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Oct;148(4):1831
pubmed: 33138479