Adapting a Telephone-Based, Dyadic Self-management Program to Be Delivered Over the Web: Methodology and Usability Testing.
behavioral interventions
caregiver
dyadic
eHealth
interventions
self-care
self-management
stress management
web-based
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2023
16 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
28
10
2022
accepted:
03
04
2023
revised:
31
03
2023
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the need for web-based behavioral interventions to support individuals who are diagnosed with chronic conditions and their informal caregivers. However, most interventions focus on patient outcomes. Dyadic technology-enabled interventions that simultaneously improve outcomes for patients and caregivers are needed. This study aimed to describe the methodology used to adapt a telephone-based, facilitated, and dyadic self-management program called Self-care Using Collaborative Coping Enhancement in Diseases (SUCCEED) into a self-guided, web-based version (web-SUCCEED) and to conduct usability testing for web-SUCCEED. We developed web-SUCCEED in 6 steps: ideation-determine the intervention content areas; prototyping-develop the wireframes, illustrating the look and feel of the website; prototype refinement via feedback from focus groups; finalizing the module content; programming web-SUCCEED; and usability testing. A diverse team of stakeholders including content experts, web designers, patients, and caregivers provided input at various stages of development. Costs, including full-time equivalent employee, were summarized. At the ideation stage, we determined the content of web-SUCCEED based on feedback from the program's original pilot study. At the prototyping stage, the principal investigator and web designers iteratively developed prototypes that included inclusive design elements (eg, large font size). Feedback about these prototypes was elicited through 2 focus groups of veterans with chronic conditions (n=13). Rapid thematic analysis identified two themes: (1) web-based interventions can be useful for many but should include ways to connect with other users and (2) prototypes were sufficient to elicit feedback about the esthetics, but a live website allowing for continual feedback and updating would be better. Focus group feedback was incorporated into building a functional website. In parallel, the content experts worked in small groups to adapt SUCCEED's content, so that it could be delivered in a didactic, self-guided format. Usability testing was completed by veterans (8/16, 50%) and caregivers (8/16, 50%). Veterans and caregivers gave web-SUCCEED high usability scores, noting that it was easy to understand, easy to use, and not overly burdensome. Notable negative feedback included "slightly agreeing" that the site was confusing and awkward. All veterans (8/8, 100%) agreed that they would choose this type of program in the future to access an intervention that aims to improve their health. Developing and maintaining the software and hosting together cost approximately US $100,000, excluding salary and fringe benefits for project personnel (steps 1-3: US $25,000; steps 4-6: US $75,000). Adapting an existing, facilitated self-management support program for delivery via the web is feasible, and such programs can remotely deliver content. Input from a multidisciplinary team of experts and stakeholders can ensure the program's success. Those interested in adapting programs should have a realistic estimate of the budget and staffing requirements.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified the need for web-based behavioral interventions to support individuals who are diagnosed with chronic conditions and their informal caregivers. However, most interventions focus on patient outcomes. Dyadic technology-enabled interventions that simultaneously improve outcomes for patients and caregivers are needed.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to describe the methodology used to adapt a telephone-based, facilitated, and dyadic self-management program called Self-care Using Collaborative Coping Enhancement in Diseases (SUCCEED) into a self-guided, web-based version (web-SUCCEED) and to conduct usability testing for web-SUCCEED.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed web-SUCCEED in 6 steps: ideation-determine the intervention content areas; prototyping-develop the wireframes, illustrating the look and feel of the website; prototype refinement via feedback from focus groups; finalizing the module content; programming web-SUCCEED; and usability testing. A diverse team of stakeholders including content experts, web designers, patients, and caregivers provided input at various stages of development. Costs, including full-time equivalent employee, were summarized.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At the ideation stage, we determined the content of web-SUCCEED based on feedback from the program's original pilot study. At the prototyping stage, the principal investigator and web designers iteratively developed prototypes that included inclusive design elements (eg, large font size). Feedback about these prototypes was elicited through 2 focus groups of veterans with chronic conditions (n=13). Rapid thematic analysis identified two themes: (1) web-based interventions can be useful for many but should include ways to connect with other users and (2) prototypes were sufficient to elicit feedback about the esthetics, but a live website allowing for continual feedback and updating would be better. Focus group feedback was incorporated into building a functional website. In parallel, the content experts worked in small groups to adapt SUCCEED's content, so that it could be delivered in a didactic, self-guided format. Usability testing was completed by veterans (8/16, 50%) and caregivers (8/16, 50%). Veterans and caregivers gave web-SUCCEED high usability scores, noting that it was easy to understand, easy to use, and not overly burdensome. Notable negative feedback included "slightly agreeing" that the site was confusing and awkward. All veterans (8/8, 100%) agreed that they would choose this type of program in the future to access an intervention that aims to improve their health. Developing and maintaining the software and hosting together cost approximately US $100,000, excluding salary and fringe benefits for project personnel (steps 1-3: US $25,000; steps 4-6: US $75,000).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Adapting an existing, facilitated self-management support program for delivery via the web is feasible, and such programs can remotely deliver content. Input from a multidisciplinary team of experts and stakeholders can ensure the program's success. Those interested in adapting programs should have a realistic estimate of the budget and staffing requirements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37327057
pii: v7i1e43903
doi: 10.2196/43903
pmc: PMC10337331
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43903Informations de copyright
©Ranak Trivedi, Sierra Kawena Hirayama, Rashmi Risbud, Madhuvanthi Suresh, Marika Blair Humber, Kevin Butler, Alex Razze, Christine Timko, Karin Nelson, Donna M Zulman, Steven M Asch, Keith Humphreys, John D Piette. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 16.06.2023.
Références
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Nov;42(11):974-992
pubmed: 31941418
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):307-18
pubmed: 23916918
Health Educ Res. 2007 Feb;22(1):108-19
pubmed: 16829544
Rand Health Q. 2014 Jun 1;4(2):14
pubmed: 28083343
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct 01;37(5):E160-E168
pubmed: 35952314
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;34(5):399-409
pubmed: 31365440
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):246-52
pubmed: 18474888
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;9:668197
pubmed: 33981669
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2297-2302
pubmed: 28693921
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):792-6
pubmed: 11926853
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e11247
pubmed: 30368439
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 10;17(6):e142
pubmed: 26063161
Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):136-48
pubmed: 20185970
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 4;22(3):e15509
pubmed: 32130143
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):398
pubmed: 34380440
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jul;103:109-138
pubmed: 28550996
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;31(9):963-73
pubmed: 26799782
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022 Sep;54(5):598-606
pubmed: 35294089
Psychooncology. 2012 Mar;21(3):336-41
pubmed: 21830255
Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2809-18
pubmed: 17999405
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 29;4:171
pubmed: 27626029
Am J Med Qual. 2021 May-Jun 01;36(3):145-155
pubmed: 32723072
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679
pubmed: 34344699
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 29;18(1):e24
pubmed: 26825969
Gerontechnology. 2017 Mar;16(1):12-20
pubmed: 30705614
J Behav Med. 2021 Apr;44(2):241-252
pubmed: 33247416
Health Psychol. 2004 Nov;23(6):599-611
pubmed: 15546228
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;34(3):239-46
pubmed: 26963544
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019 Mar-Apr;37(2):264-284
pubmed: 30421667
Chronic Illn. 2010 Mar;6(1):22-33
pubmed: 20308348
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2237960
pubmed: 36374502
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e32
pubmed: 28213341
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):1080-7
pubmed: 23973872
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):463-473
pubmed: 29283613
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Mar;28(3):399-406
pubmed: 34086485
Heart Lung. 2022 Sep-Oct;55:24-28
pubmed: 35436655
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):e21
pubmed: 29343460
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):377-379
pubmed: 32202977