Design and approval of the nutritional warnings' policy in Peru: Milestones, key stakeholders, and policy drivers for its approval.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
05
09
2022
accepted:
21
05
2023
medline:
16
6
2023
pubmed:
16
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nutritional warnings are used as a public health strategy to address obesity. Peru approved in 2013 and implemented in 2019 a law requiring nutritional warnings on the marketing and packaging of processed foods high in sugar, sodium, saturated fat, and containing trans-fat. The complexity behind the design and approval of these policies over six years provides unique learnings, that inform the obesity prevention context, especially when proposed policies face strong opposition from powerful stakeholders. Our study aims to describe the milestones and key stakeholders' roles and stances during the nutritional warnings policy design in Peru, and to identify and analyze the main drivers of policy change that explain its approval. In 2021, interviews were conducted with 25 key informants closely involved in its design. Interviews were analyzed using the Kaleidoscope Model as a theoretical framework. Relevant policy documents and news were also analyzed. Milestones for this policy included the approval of the Law, Regulation, and Manual. Policy supporters were mainly from Congress, civil society advocates, and Health Ministers. Opponents came from Congress, ministries linked to the economic sector, the food industry, and media. Across the years, warnings evolved from a single text, to traffic lights, to the approved black octagons. Main challenges included the strong opposition of powerful stakeholders, the lack of agreement for defining the appropriate evidence supporting nutritional warning parameters and design, and the political instability of the country. Based on the Kaleidoscope Model, the policy successfully targeted a relevant problem (unhealthy eating decisions) and had powerful advocates who effectively used focusing events to reposition the warnings in the policy agenda across the years. Negotiations weakened the policy but led to its approval. Importantly, government veto players were mostly in favor of the policy, which enabled its final approval despite the strong opposition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37327194
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001121
pii: PGPH-D-22-01451
pmc: PMC10275441
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0001121Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Diez-Canseco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Global Health. 2020 Oct 27;16(1):107
pubmed: 33109216
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(17):5927-5940
pubmed: 34313211
Global Health. 2020 Oct 12;16(1):97
pubmed: 33046110
Obes Rev. 2018 Aug;19(8):1028-1064
pubmed: 29691969
Salud Colect. 2018 Jul-Sep;14(3):639-640
pubmed: 30517568
Health Res Policy Syst. 2003 Jan 13;1(1):2
pubmed: 12646071
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):e1752063
pubmed: 32486930
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2737-2745
pubmed: 32819452
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):936-941
pubmed: 30744710
Health Syst Reform. 2020;6(1):e1669122
pubmed: 32043913
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2022 Oct-Dec;39(4):480-488
pubmed: 36888812
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jan 25;:1
pubmed: 33487194
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015 Jul-Sep;32(3):603
pubmed: 26580947
Health Promot Int. 2021 Mar 12;36(1):155-164
pubmed: 32388550
Public Health. 2007 Apr;121(4):278-86
pubmed: 17217971
Health Syst Reform. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):1-8
pubmed: 32530726
Annu Rev Nutr. 2021 Oct 11;41:529-550
pubmed: 34339293
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269892
pubmed: 35749373
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Dec 01;18:100400
pubmed: 36844016
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):906
pubmed: 31286910