Efficacy of initial caspofungin plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for severe PCP in patients without human immunodeficiency virus infection.
Caspofungin
Combination therapy
Pneumocystis pneumonia
Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole
Journal
BMC infectious diseases
ISSN: 1471-2334
Titre abrégé: BMC Infect Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2023
16 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
07
04
2023
accepted:
03
06
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
17
6
2023
entrez:
16
6
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The number of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) cases is increasing in immunocompromised patients without human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV), causing serious morbidity with high mortality. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) monotherapy has limited effectiveness in the treatment of PCP. Clinical data on whether initial caspofungin plus TMP/SMZ for this disease is superior to monotherapy in non-HIV-infected patients are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of these regimens for severe PCP in non-HIV patients. A retrospective study reviewed 104 non-HIV-infected patients with confirmed PCP in the intensive care unit between January 2016 and December 2021. Eleven patients were excluded from the study because TMP/SMZ could not be used due to severe hematologic disorders or clinical data were missing. All enrolled patients were divided into three groups according to different treatment strategies: Group 1 received TMP/SMZ monotherapy, Group 2 received caspofungin combined with TMP/SMZ as first-line therapy, and Group 3 initially received TMP/SMZ monotherapy and later received caspofungin as salvage therapy. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among the groups. A total of 93 patients met the criteria. The overall positive response rate of anti-PCP treatment was 58.06%, and the overall 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 49.46%. The median APACHE II score was 21.44. The concurrent infection rate was 74.19%, among whom 15.05% (n = 14) of those patients had pulmonary aspergillosis, 21.05% (n = 20) had bacteremia, and 23.65% (n = 22) had CMV infections. The patients who received initial caspofungin combination with TMP/SMZ had the best positive response rate (76.74%) compared to others (p = 0.001). Furthermore, the group that received initial caspofungin combined with TMP/SMZ had a 90-day all-cause mortality rate (39.53%) that was significantly different from that of the shift group (65.51%, p = 0.024), but this rate showed no statistically significant difference compared with that in the monotherapy group (48.62%, p = 0.322). None of the patients had serious adverse events from caspofungin therapy. For non-HIV-infected patients with severe PCP, initial combination therapy with caspofungin and TMP/SMZ is a promising first-line treatment option compared with TMP/SMZ monotherapy and combination therapy as salvage therapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The number of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) cases is increasing in immunocompromised patients without human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV), causing serious morbidity with high mortality. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) monotherapy has limited effectiveness in the treatment of PCP. Clinical data on whether initial caspofungin plus TMP/SMZ for this disease is superior to monotherapy in non-HIV-infected patients are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of these regimens for severe PCP in non-HIV patients.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective study reviewed 104 non-HIV-infected patients with confirmed PCP in the intensive care unit between January 2016 and December 2021. Eleven patients were excluded from the study because TMP/SMZ could not be used due to severe hematologic disorders or clinical data were missing. All enrolled patients were divided into three groups according to different treatment strategies: Group 1 received TMP/SMZ monotherapy, Group 2 received caspofungin combined with TMP/SMZ as first-line therapy, and Group 3 initially received TMP/SMZ monotherapy and later received caspofungin as salvage therapy. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among the groups.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 93 patients met the criteria. The overall positive response rate of anti-PCP treatment was 58.06%, and the overall 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 49.46%. The median APACHE II score was 21.44. The concurrent infection rate was 74.19%, among whom 15.05% (n = 14) of those patients had pulmonary aspergillosis, 21.05% (n = 20) had bacteremia, and 23.65% (n = 22) had CMV infections. The patients who received initial caspofungin combination with TMP/SMZ had the best positive response rate (76.74%) compared to others (p = 0.001). Furthermore, the group that received initial caspofungin combined with TMP/SMZ had a 90-day all-cause mortality rate (39.53%) that was significantly different from that of the shift group (65.51%, p = 0.024), but this rate showed no statistically significant difference compared with that in the monotherapy group (48.62%, p = 0.322). None of the patients had serious adverse events from caspofungin therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
For non-HIV-infected patients with severe PCP, initial combination therapy with caspofungin and TMP/SMZ is a promising first-line treatment option compared with TMP/SMZ monotherapy and combination therapy as salvage therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37328748
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08372-z
pii: 10.1186/s12879-023-08372-z
pmc: PMC10273704
doi:
Substances chimiques
Caspofungin
F0XDI6ZL63
Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
8064-90-2
Drug Combinations
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
409Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Aug;42(8):1985-9
pubmed: 9687394
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Nov 26;62(12):
pubmed: 30249686
IDCases. 2019 Jan 26;15:e00496
pubmed: 30828545
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;95:464-467
pubmed: 32194238
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016 Sep;42(5):813-46
pubmed: 26369708
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Sep;71(9):2405-13
pubmed: 27550993
HIV Med. 2021 Apr;22(4):307-313
pubmed: 33277811
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Jun 14;112(13 Spec No):47-50
pubmed: 1079469
Intern Med J. 2014 Dec;44(12b):1350-63
pubmed: 25482745
Chest. 2007 Oct;132(4):1305-10
pubmed: 17934116
Thorax. 2011 Jun;66(6):537-8
pubmed: 20880871
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):59-66
pubmed: 18573675
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl B:33-53
pubmed: 8818828
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Oct;51(10):3380-8
pubmed: 23903553
Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;20(9):1490-7
pubmed: 25148074
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Sep;128(9):1023-7
pubmed: 15335253
Transplant Proc. 2017 Oct;49(8):1893-1898
pubmed: 28923644
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Nov;88:141-148
pubmed: 31442630
Scand J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;45(6):484-8
pubmed: 23317167
Transplantation. 2007 Sep 27;84(6):685-8
pubmed: 17893600
Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;19(3):386-92
pubmed: 23622345
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Nov 1;43(9):e92-4
pubmed: 17029129
J Infect. 2014 Jul;69(1):88-95
pubmed: 24607411
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Nov;140(5):1204-9
pubmed: 2817582
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jan;55(1):105820
pubmed: 31622654
Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R28
pubmed: 18304356
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):546
pubmed: 35701759
Med Mycol. 2014 Nov;52(8):798-803
pubmed: 25288652
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):762-9
pubmed: 6966901
J Pediatr. 1978 Feb;92(2):285-91
pubmed: 304478
Med Mal Infect. 2014 May;44(5):185-98
pubmed: 24630595
Nature. 1988 Aug 11;334(6182):519-22
pubmed: 2970013
N Engl J Med. 1976 Sep 23;295(13):716-8
pubmed: 1085413